Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: The World Needs A Vaccine For Suckervirus

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default The World Needs A Vaccine For Suckervirus

    p.s. A coronavirus vaccine must be followed by forced vaccinations:

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...63#post3663163

    Big Pharma (WALL STREET) smell big tax dollars coming their way to pay for a hoax. If you think those companies will spend a penny they do not get back from taxpayers you need a vaccination for the oldest pandemic known to man —— SUCKERVIRUS:


    Several COVID-19 vaccines currently under development may require more than one dose in order to be effective, pharmaceutical company executives told a House subcommittee on Tuesday.

    Pfizer anticipates that the vaccine the company is taking to a pivotal trial "will use an initial dose plus a booster -- so yes, two doses," said John Young, the company's chief business officer, testifying at a hearing held by the House Energy & Commerce Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee.

    At AstraZeneca, "our data suggest two doses give a stronger immune response than one, but until we understand the correlates of immune detection, we don't know whether one will be enough," said Menelas Pangalos, PhD, executive vice president for biopharmaceutical research and development at the company. "We'll go with two to be sure, but it could end up becoming one dose."

    "That's really helpful for us and the public to understand," said Rep. Greg Walden (R-Ore.), ranking member of the full Energy & Commerce Committee. "When we talk about having 300 million doses or 30 million doses, we probably should cut that in half in terms of the number of people that are actually going to be able to get vaccinated in worst-case scenarios."

    Some companies are pursuing a different strategy; witness Julie Gerberding, MD, executive vice president and chief patient officer at Merck, said that her company has "selected vaccine candidates we hope will be single-dose."

    Concerns About the Short Timeframe

    Several committee members expressed concern about the possible consequences of a shortened timeframe for developing vaccines.

    "We all want a COVID-19 vaccine to be developed as soon as possible, but before a vaccine is distributed, public health experts must ensure that it is safe, effective, and available to all who need it," said Rep. Frank Pallone (D-N.J.), chairman of the full Energy & Commerce Committee. "My fear is that FDA will be forced by the Trump administration to approve a vaccine that lacks effectiveness."

    Witnesses disputed that idea. "All of our interactions with the regulators have given us no evidence that they're lowering the standards or thinking about lowering the standards," said Pangalos. "Remember, this is going to be a vaccine that's going to be used globally, so every regulatory authority is going to have a view on efficacy and safety of our vaccine."

    "We do believe it's going to be possible in a safe way to bring forth an effective vaccine in 12-18 months," said Stephen Hoge, MD, president of Moderna. "We've been working around the clock ... to make sure we're doing this in an incredibly responsible way all the way through."

    Pfizer, Moderna Farthest Along

    As for progress on a vaccine, Pfizer and Moderna seemed to be leading the pack.

    Pfizer is hoping to begin its phase III trial this month, said Young. "There are encouraging early signs, but there is a lot more work left to do." If all goes well, "we hope to be able to provide a dossier of clinical data from our large phase IIb/III study to the FDA in October," and see whether it meets the FDA's requirement for an emergency use authorization; the company hopes to deliver up to 100 million doses globally in 2020 and 1.3 billion doses in 2021, he said.

    Bet your ass that the United Nations will pay for every Third World dose with American tax dollars.

    Hoge said Moderna's phase III trial on its vaccine candidate "is a little beyond our control in terms of timing," but presuming the company can accrue cases quickly, "we hope in the fall or towards the end of the year we would have data we can submit to the FDA."

    Macaya Douoguih, MD, head of clinical development and medical affairs at Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, said her company "is targeting to at least have results by early 2021 and have 100 million doses by the end of March, while Gerberding said Merck "expects to be in clinical trials imminently, but wouldn't expect to have a licensed product until 2021 at the earliest."

    Here comes doublespeak for ‘freebie’:


    Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) said she was concerned about how expensive the vaccine would be and asked the witnesses whether their companies would agree to sell the vaccine at cost.

    Hoge said Moderna would not do so, as did Gerberding, while Pangalos said under the agreement AstraZeneca has with the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) to produce 300 million doses of a vaccine, it will be selling the vaccine to the government "at no profit." Douoguih said Janssen will be providing its vaccine at a "not-for-profit price" during the pandemic.

    Young said that Pfizer recognizes that "these are extraordinary times and our pricing will reflect that during the term of the pandemic; we'll price our potential vaccine consistent with the urgent global health emergency that we're facing," but added that the company also believes the vaccine "should be free to the public.

    A vaccine is also meaningless if everybody is not forced to get vaccinated:


    A vaccine is meaningless if people are unable to afford it."

    Developing a Distribution Plan

    Several committee members wanted to know whether the companies had plans for how to prioritize who would receive the vaccine first.

    "We should be able to develop a distribution plan based on public health principles to slow transmission," said Rep. Raul Ruiz, MD (D-Calif.). "We need to ask, where is the highest risk and highest rate of transmission, and which communities are dying at a disproportionate rate of coronavirus? It's not too difficult to find the answers to those questions ... We need public health principles based on public health equity -- not politics, not profit, not going to the highest bidder for objectives that favor the powerful and wealthy."

    Shortly after the hearing ended, the National Academy of Medicine announced that it was launching a committee to study the equitable allocation of any COVID-19 vaccine developed; the committee's first meeting is Friday.

    Rep. Buddy Carter (R-Ga.) raised the question of whether the drugmakers were sourcing their raw materials and other supplies from foreign countries. "This is a serious issue," Carter said. "I think we should do everything we can to domesticate manufacturing."

    Pangalos said all of his company's U.S. supply chain "comes from the U.S." Gerberding said that Merck's supply chain "is generally very much localized to the U.S. and a couple of places in Europe, but I need to verify the entirety of the supply chain." Hoge said Moderna's vaccine is "made entirely in the U.S.," but some supplies for the vaccine's raw materials are being procured internationally, mostly from Europe.

    Is Brooks double speaking forced vaccinations?


    Rep . Susan Brooks (R-Ind.) asked about how the companies planned to overcome vaccine hesitancy.

    "Efforts need to start now in terms of education and outreach," said Douoguih. "Of course we have to develop a safe and efficacious vaccine, and be confident the data we're presenting are shared in an understandable and digestible way so that people feel comfortable in accepting a vaccination, but I do think that communities that are disproportionately affected might require more engagement, and that's a long process that really needs to start now such that they could even consider participating in clinical trials."

    "For Pfizer, data transparency is really important," said Young. "One of the commitments we made early on in this pandemic is to publish transparently our clinical data ... We're also looking to ensure that our pivotal study is representative of the burden of disease for COVID-19, so recruitment of minorities, of women, of older patients into the study is going to be really important. That's critical so that when that trial completes and when we follow up with those patients ... the grass roots of America can be confident that a vaccine that is approved is going to be safe and effective for patients."


    COVID-19 Vaccines May Require Two Doses, House Members Told
    — Would halve the number of people who could initially be vaccinated
    by Joyce Frieden
    Today July 22, 2020

    https://www.medpagetoday.com/infecti.../covid19/87678

    And here comes the NY bum pushing the scare tactic for his pals on Wall Street. Move the the cursor to 8:23 for fake death totals:




    And lets not forget the reason for forced vaccinations:


    Software billionaire Bill Gates, who previously has advocated the reduction of the human population through the use of vaccines, and his wife Melinda marked the 100th year since the First International Eugenics Congress in London with a “family planning” summit with abortionists and the United Nations.

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...94#post3537794

    Finally, parasites become verbally abusive in supermarkets when they see another customer not wearing a mask. What do you think the Parasite Class will do to anyone who refuses to prove they were vaccinated?
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Flanders For This Post:

    Cancel 2020.2 (07-22-2020)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Location
    Valparaiso, Indiana USA
    Posts
    12,308
    Thanks
    12,429
    Thanked 3,406 Times in 2,917 Posts
    Groans
    5,261
    Groaned 325 Times in 306 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    p.s. A coronavirus vaccine must be followed by forced vaccinations:

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...63#post3663163

    Big Pharma (WALL STREET) smell big tax dollars coming their way to pay for a hoax. If you think those companies will spend a penny they do not get back from taxpayers you need a vaccination for the oldest pandemic known to man —— SUCKERVIRUS:


    Several COVID-19 vaccines currently under development may require more than one dose in order to be effective, pharmaceutical company executives told a House subcommittee on Tuesday.

    Pfizer anticipates that the vaccine the company is taking to a pivotal trial "will use an initial dose plus a booster -- so yes, two doses," said John Young, the company's chief business officer, testifying at a hearing held by the House Energy & Commerce Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee.

    At AstraZeneca, "our data suggest two doses give a stronger immune response than one, but until we understand the correlates of immune detection, we don't know whether one will be enough," said Menelas Pangalos, PhD, executive vice president for biopharmaceutical research and development at the company. "We'll go with two to be sure, but it could end up becoming one dose."

    "That's really helpful for us and the public to understand," said Rep. Greg Walden (R-Ore.), ranking member of the full Energy & Commerce Committee. "When we talk about having 300 million doses or 30 million doses, we probably should cut that in half in terms of the number of people that are actually going to be able to get vaccinated in worst-case scenarios."

    Some companies are pursuing a different strategy; witness Julie Gerberding, MD, executive vice president and chief patient officer at Merck, said that her company has "selected vaccine candidates we hope will be single-dose."

    Concerns About the Short Timeframe

    Several committee members expressed concern about the possible consequences of a shortened timeframe for developing vaccines.

    "We all want a COVID-19 vaccine to be developed as soon as possible, but before a vaccine is distributed, public health experts must ensure that it is safe, effective, and available to all who need it," said Rep. Frank Pallone (D-N.J.), chairman of the full Energy & Commerce Committee. "My fear is that FDA will be forced by the Trump administration to approve a vaccine that lacks effectiveness."

    Witnesses disputed that idea. "All of our interactions with the regulators have given us no evidence that they're lowering the standards or thinking about lowering the standards," said Pangalos. "Remember, this is going to be a vaccine that's going to be used globally, so every regulatory authority is going to have a view on efficacy and safety of our vaccine."

    "We do believe it's going to be possible in a safe way to bring forth an effective vaccine in 12-18 months," said Stephen Hoge, MD, president of Moderna. "We've been working around the clock ... to make sure we're doing this in an incredibly responsible way all the way through."

    Pfizer, Moderna Farthest Along

    As for progress on a vaccine, Pfizer and Moderna seemed to be leading the pack.

    Pfizer is hoping to begin its phase III trial this month, said Young. "There are encouraging early signs, but there is a lot more work left to do." If all goes well, "we hope to be able to provide a dossier of clinical data from our large phase IIb/III study to the FDA in October," and see whether it meets the FDA's requirement for an emergency use authorization; the company hopes to deliver up to 100 million doses globally in 2020 and 1.3 billion doses in 2021, he said.

    Bet your ass that the United Nations will pay for every Third World dose with American tax dollars.

    Hoge said Moderna's phase III trial on its vaccine candidate "is a little beyond our control in terms of timing," but presuming the company can accrue cases quickly, "we hope in the fall or towards the end of the year we would have data we can submit to the FDA."

    Macaya Douoguih, MD, head of clinical development and medical affairs at Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, said her company "is targeting to at least have results by early 2021 and have 100 million doses by the end of March, while Gerberding said Merck "expects to be in clinical trials imminently, but wouldn't expect to have a licensed product until 2021 at the earliest."

    Here comes doublespeak for ‘freebie’:


    Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) said she was concerned about how expensive the vaccine would be and asked the witnesses whether their companies would agree to sell the vaccine at cost.

    Hoge said Moderna would not do so, as did Gerberding, while Pangalos said under the agreement AstraZeneca has with the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) to produce 300 million doses of a vaccine, it will be selling the vaccine to the government "at no profit." Douoguih said Janssen will be providing its vaccine at a "not-for-profit price" during the pandemic.

    Young said that Pfizer recognizes that "these are extraordinary times and our pricing will reflect that during the term of the pandemic; we'll price our potential vaccine consistent with the urgent global health emergency that we're facing," but added that the company also believes the vaccine "should be free to the public.

    A vaccine is also meaningless if everybody is not forced to get vaccinated:


    A vaccine is meaningless if people are unable to afford it."

    Developing a Distribution Plan

    Several committee members wanted to know whether the companies had plans for how to prioritize who would receive the vaccine first.

    "We should be able to develop a distribution plan based on public health principles to slow transmission," said Rep. Raul Ruiz, MD (D-Calif.). "We need to ask, where is the highest risk and highest rate of transmission, and which communities are dying at a disproportionate rate of coronavirus? It's not too difficult to find the answers to those questions ... We need public health principles based on public health equity -- not politics, not profit, not going to the highest bidder for objectives that favor the powerful and wealthy."

    Shortly after the hearing ended, the National Academy of Medicine announced that it was launching a committee to study the equitable allocation of any COVID-19 vaccine developed; the committee's first meeting is Friday.

    Rep. Buddy Carter (R-Ga.) raised the question of whether the drugmakers were sourcing their raw materials and other supplies from foreign countries. "This is a serious issue," Carter said. "I think we should do everything we can to domesticate manufacturing."

    Pangalos said all of his company's U.S. supply chain "comes from the U.S." Gerberding said that Merck's supply chain "is generally very much localized to the U.S. and a couple of places in Europe, but I need to verify the entirety of the supply chain." Hoge said Moderna's vaccine is "made entirely in the U.S.," but some supplies for the vaccine's raw materials are being procured internationally, mostly from Europe.

    Is Brooks double speaking forced vaccinations?


    Rep . Susan Brooks (R-Ind.) asked about how the companies planned to overcome vaccine hesitancy.

    "Efforts need to start now in terms of education and outreach," said Douoguih. "Of course we have to develop a safe and efficacious vaccine, and be confident the data we're presenting are shared in an understandable and digestible way so that people feel comfortable in accepting a vaccination, but I do think that communities that are disproportionately affected might require more engagement, and that's a long process that really needs to start now such that they could even consider participating in clinical trials."

    "For Pfizer, data transparency is really important," said Young. "One of the commitments we made early on in this pandemic is to publish transparently our clinical data ... We're also looking to ensure that our pivotal study is representative of the burden of disease for COVID-19, so recruitment of minorities, of women, of older patients into the study is going to be really important. That's critical so that when that trial completes and when we follow up with those patients ... the grass roots of America can be confident that a vaccine that is approved is going to be safe and effective for patients."


    COVID-19 Vaccines May Require Two Doses, House Members Told
    — Would halve the number of people who could initially be vaccinated
    by Joyce Frieden
    Today July 22, 2020

    https://www.medpagetoday.com/infecti.../covid19/87678

    And here comes the NY bum pushing the scare tactic for his pals on Wall Street. Move the the cursor to 8:23 for fake death totals:




    And lets not forget the reason for forced vaccinations:


    Software billionaire Bill Gates, who previously has advocated the reduction of the human population through the use of vaccines, and his wife Melinda marked the 100th year since the First International Eugenics Congress in London with a “family planning” summit with abortionists and the United Nations.

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...94#post3537794

    Finally, parasites become verbally abusive in supermarkets when they see another customer not wearing a mask. What do you think the Parasite Class will do to anyone who refuses to prove they were vaccinated?
    Fine post, Flanders. Thank you.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Cancel 2020.2 For This Post:

    Flanders (07-22-2020)

  5. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,958
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,036 Times in 13,846 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Say goodnight Alice

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to archives For This Post:

    Guno צְבִי (07-22-2020)

  7. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    NC originally from NYC
    Posts
    34,852
    Thanks
    139,597
    Thanked 23,543 Times in 14,028 Posts
    Groans
    58
    Groaned 1,451 Times in 1,370 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    poor Flanders over 85 years old waiting for 1950 to come back and has the morgue on speed dill
    “If we have to have a choice between being dead and pitied, and being alive with a bad image, we’d rather be alive and have the bad image.”

    — Golda Meir

    Zionism is the movement for the self-determination and statehood for the Jewish people in their ancestral homeland, the land of Israel.







    ברוך השם

  8. The Following User Groans At Guno צְבִי For This Awful Post:

    Cancel 2020.2 (07-22-2020)

  9. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Location
    Valparaiso, Indiana USA
    Posts
    12,308
    Thanks
    12,429
    Thanked 3,406 Times in 2,917 Posts
    Groans
    5,261
    Groaned 325 Times in 306 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by guno View Post
    poor Flanders over 85 years old waiting for 1950 to come back and has the morgue on speed dill

  10. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    Finally, parasites become verbally abusive in supermarkets when they see another customer not wearing a mask.




    How can I say that? We’re constantly told by the mass media that COVID-19 has killed a great many. Most states and global corporations now ‘mandate’ masks. The ‘authorities’ tell us wearing a mask will help save lives, right?

    Wrong. For one thing, none of the Gates-controlled and paid for data can be trusted. The dehumanizing masks can’t prevent the virus and in fact, wearers often fiddle with them. They try adjust them to make their uncomfortable mufflers more comfortable. By doing so, the masks become depositories for dirty fingers. Some workers must breathe in their own CO2 for eight hours while working. If the mandatory mask wearing becomes permanent, it could become more damaging than the virus.

    The real damage is inflicted upon our liberty. They tyrants are able to dictate face diaper wearing and people must go along in order to travel, go shopping, or visit the post office. In some cities there are fines and a couple of people have already been shot dead by police for not wearing them!

    The battle over mask wearing has now been lost. It was never about safety. It’s has always been about conditioning and compliance and most are complying. Peer pressure does the rest. A few days ago I went food shopping. I was the only one in the store without a mask and the checkout clerk barked at me to social distance because I was mask-less, even though I was in the designated box. I was treated like a threatening disease. A while later, I could not go into the post office. A large sign told me I must now sport a mask. I didn’t have one.

    I also saw young people walking alone on sidewalks under a hot sun with masks on. I saw others driving in their cars with masks on. The steady drumbeat of fear from the corporate mass media has been successful. The masks are here to stay and people are marching in lockstep with them on. No resistance offered. Control by mask was all too easy for the Illuminati. They want us to voluntarily cooperate with our own demise and we’re cooperating. Businesses are, too. No shirt, no shoes, no mask, no service.

    Once people are conditioned to wearing harmful masks, Bill Gates’ mandatory harmful vaccine will be a snap. Many people will insist on a biometric, trackable vaccine in order to shed their masks. Then it will be the same. No access to travel, shopping, or post office use without the ‘mark of the beast’ vaccine. A smiling Gates will rake in more billions of dollars while subjecting us all to noxious, life-shortening substances that will no doubt be present in his vaccine. It won’t stop the coronavirus, but it will stop us. His ID2020 vision will come to fruition. It will be combined with a cashless system, which means everything we do and spend will be tracked and taxed. A Chinese-style social credit system will become commonplace. It all ends with a police state and absolute tyranny. We’ll all be slaves at the mercy of the top, Satanic .001 percent. They will rejoice because We, the Sheeple will have voluntarily done it to ourselves.

    THAT is why the mask is worse than the disease.

    —Ben Garrison

    And lets not forget the money:

    Coronavirus hustlers caught the money months ago. Tax dollars will pay for manufacturing and distributing approximately 300 million masks. Do the math. Fifteen dollars per mask multiplied by 300 million, and that is not counting replacement costs year after year until the end of time. (Fifteen dollars is the rock bottom price when government parasites are spending tax dollars.)

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...33#post3752733
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  11. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    p.s. A coronavirus vaccine must be followed by forced vaccinations:

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...63#post3663163
    Remove forced vaccinations from the equation and there are more than enough known facts to avoid being suckered by the vaccination scam:



    In my previous column, we took a look at an alarming article by a professor of law from Stanford University that – though it appeared in the latest issue of the New England Journal of Medicine – had nothing whatsoever to do with science.

    Instead, it brazenly outlined a scheme to deprive anyone refusing the impending COVID-19 vaccine of their liberty and right to work without running afoul of any “legal challenges on procedural due-process grounds” – or, as they probably like to call it at Standford’s law school, ‘that pesky Fifth Amendment.’

    But even putting aside any right you may have to decide which drugs get injected into your body, it’s hard to say whether the idea of forcing us to get vaccinated for COVID-19 is more frightening or nonsensical.

    On the frightening side: Two of the leading contenders in the race to produce a vaccine are using experimental technology that artificially stimulates an immune response by… hold on to your seats… genetically altering your cells with RNA from the virus so they start producing proteins from its outer shell. Though it probably won’t be described this way in any ad campaign, it’s tough to see what’s inaccurate about saying mRNA technology works by genetically modifying you into a human-coronavirus hybrid.

    Moreover, not only are these potential COVID vaccines being developed with never-before-witnessed haste, mRNA technology has never been approved for use before. In fact, this will be the first time it’s even been tested in a large-scale clinical trial!

    There’s always some risk attending the introduction of any new medication. But put all of this together, and it’s hard to see how the impending COVID-19 vaccine won’t be one of the riskiest if not the riskiest pharmaceutical product ever marketed.

    The pharmaceutical companies racing to be the first to develop it certainly seem to think so.

    Something else you probably haven’t heard is that they’ve managed to get immunity from liability should anything go horribly wrong and you or a member of your family wind up seriously harmed or even killed by the most hastily produced vaccine in history. Doubly distressing since, apart from signaling an alarming lack of confidence in the safety of their own product, it also removes the normal incentives the firms in this record-breaking rush to develop a COVID-19 vaccine have to make sure it’s safe.

    But to add insult to your inability to sue for injury, the FDA is totally fine with a COVID-19 vaccine that’s only 50% effective. So as many as half the people risking an injection may very well wind up having done so for absolutely no reason.

    Which brings us to the nonsensical.

    Why on earth would anyone so much as consider getting injected with such a vaccine – let alone be forced to do so by the state as soon as it’s on the market – given that even on the World Health Organization’s official numbers, COVID-19 is now no more deadly than the seasonal flu?

    But you may not have heard the latest entry in the long list of crucial facts the media’s been keeping from you.

    Last week, W.H.O. officials estimated that 750 million people have been infected with the virus worldwide. Even ignoring that, just like the U.S. a lot of countries seem to be using criteria that are massively inflating the virus’s death count, the roughly one million reported deaths worldwide would imply that COVID’s fatality rate is around .13%. That is, it’s the same as the flu’s.

    But what’s even more disturbing about this hysterical push to get us to take a COVID-19 vaccine is that dozens of research studies have shown that a lot of us already have preexisting immunity through prior contact with long-common but harmless variants.

    As I reported a few weeks back, Trump’s COVID-19 advisor, Dr. Scott Atlas explicitly called out CDC director Robert Redfield for… well he didn’t put it this way but there’s no way around it… lying to Congress and the American people about how many of us are still susceptible to the virus.

    Researchers have known since the middle of the last century that, besides antibody-producing B-cells, your body also has a second equally important defense against infections provided by T-cells. And, as Dr. Atlas pointed out:


    Immunity to the infection is not solely determined by the percent of people who have antibodies. If you look at the research – and there’s been about 24 papers at least on the immunity from T-cells, a different type of immunity than antibodes – […]the reality is that according to the papers from Sweden, Singapore, and elsewhere, there is crossover immunity highly likely from other infections and there is also T-cell immunity. And the combination of those make the antibodies a small fraction of the people that have immunity. So the answer is no, it is not 90% of people that are susceptible to infection.

    Moreover, even if it turns out that immunity from antibodies fades quickly, crossover immunity from T-cells doesn’t. As I reported a couple of months back in a column on some related new research indicating that COVID-19 isn’t very infectious, T-cell immunity to coronaviruses has been shown to last as long as 17 years.

    We’ve known for months that common cold coronaviruses which pretty much everyone has had can also provide T-cell immunity to COVID-19.

    And contrary to Redfield’s reprehensible perjury before Congress, the research shows that, as a result, around half of us were likely immune to COVID-19 even before the virus that’s supposed to cause it ever existed.

    But the way we’re being pushed into taking a COVID-19 vaccine is made even more distressing by someone else who denied the existence of T-cell immunity while testifying to the Senate.

    Just a few weeks back, the unofficial celebrity spokesperson for mass vaccination, Anthony Fauci himself, also tried to deny all the research indicating that half of us have no need for a COVID-19 vaccine because we’re already immune when Rand Paul finally stood up and challenged what can be charitably described as Fauci’s six-month reign of malignant deception.

    Fauci offered to address Paul’s concerns in private:


    I’d like to talk to you about that also. because there was a study that recently came out that pre-existing immunity to coronaviruses that are common cold do not cross react with COVID-19.

    As his use of the word “also” suggests, this was a trick Fauci used repeatedly when Rand Paul finally called out the relentless stream of deadly BS he’s inflicted on us since his nightmarish reign began.

    America’s answer to Pol Pot kept suggesting that he’d be happy to discuss Paul’s objections alone away from prying eyes. Who knows whether the idea was to bribe, threaten, or schmooze the Senator into backing down. Whatever Fauci’s response was, peasants like us evidently don’t need to hear it and need to just do as we’re told.

    Pre-existing T-cell immunity to COVID-19, however, is an established and completely unsurprising fact.

    As Dr. Atlas said, there are literally dozens of studies showing it exists. It’s not even clear what lone recent study that allegedly says otherwise Fauci is referring to. In fact, it appears he was simply lying and it doesn’t even exist.

    In a later interview, he criticized Dr. Atlas for informing the American people that Redfield’s testimony to congress was contradicted by dozens of studies as “extraordinarily inappropriate” without naming a single study or any other evidence showing that Dr. Atlas was wrong.

    On Fauci’s way of thinking, Redfield had exercised his prerogative to lie to the peasants and Dr. Atlas had despicably sided with the peasants by trying to expose one of their masters’ deception. And, if you think that description is in any way sarcastic, you’re still not getting what’s happening to us.

    But it’s telling that Fauci was unwilling to identify this alleged study or answer most of Rand Paul’s other questions about what in God’s name he’s been doing to us these past six months in front of the American people and, instead, requested a private audience with the Senator to assuage his concerns.

    It’s hard to imagine anything more disturbing than the main bureaucrats pushing for a rushed-to-market vaccine that may wind up using technology to modify the genetic makeup of our cells also flagrantly lying about how many of us are already immune.

    Indeed, it’s disturbing that Fauci and Redfield aren’t behind bars, let alone that they’ve continued to get away with deceitfully pushing one disastrous policy after another on us for months now unhindered.

    But, though it scarcely seems possible, the situation is even worse.

    You see, when you weren’t looking, Redfield’s CDC quietly asserted that they have blanket authority to:



    [A]pprehend, detain, examine, quarantine, isolate, or conditionally release individuals for purposes of preventing communicable disease spread.

    Surprise!

    Of course, the sweeping powers to which the CDC laid claim seem to license a whole lot more than merely locking you up for refusing a vaccine.

    “Purposes of preventing the disease from spreading” is such a broad mandate that you could find yourself deprived of liberty for suspicion of being infected by the virus.

    This would be troubling enough were it coming from an agency we had any reason to think could be trusted.

    Quite the contrary, however.

    Both the CDC and its director, Robert Redfield have spent the last six months feeding us: disinformation, bogus stats, advice that ranged from useless to deadly, and as we’ve seen – just to show they really meant it – the occasional barefaced lie.

    Neither the agency nor the man in charge could have possibly shown themselves to be more contemptible or less worthy of our trust. So, the sweeping totalitarian power they’ve claimed over our lives portends a lot worse than just forcing you and your loved ones to incur the risk that attends taking any drug by injecting an utterly pointless and hastily produced experimental vaccine while depriving you of the legal recourse you would normally have should something go awfully wrong.

    Tyrannical mayors and governors have already closed down our businesses, shuttered up our churches, locked us in our homes, and forbade appearing in public with our faces uncovered – all for absolutely no legitimate reason and all on the CDC’s say-so.

    A few weeks back, a Maryland man was sentenced to a year in jail for hosting a couple of outdoor gatherings at his home against his Governor’s orders.

    Half the country hears about his sentence and thinks: The bastard deserved it.

    They watch an asthmatic woman in Texas get tasered and dragged away in handcuffs for not pointlessly harming her health by wearing a mask outdoors and think: They should have clubbed the b**** too.

    While the rest of us are shocked & appalled for a minute or two after which time we completely forget – as we gradually become accustomed to a totalitarian new normal that, just last year, we would have scoffed at anyone suggesting could ever happen here.

    So if you think it’s outlandish to suppose they’ll start hauling people off to “quarantine wards” for suspicion of having COVID-19 or maybe just for calling out any of Redfield or Fauci’s blatant lies about it in too loud a voice, you need to wake up and look at all the dead canaries collecting in front of the coal mine exit before the pile gets too big to claw your way out.

    But what makes the CDC’s authoritarian power grab even more alarming is that, though the media didn’t report on it, they nonetheless did do a whole lot of reporting on one small part of the very strange document in which it was announced.

    Though most of its roughly 800 words are about those “regulatory updates” codifying the CDC’s sweeping “federal isolation and quarantine authority,” their announcement abruptly veers off into its main subject only after a brief 112-word opening that peddles some arrant nonsense about the 1918 Spanish flu which turned out to be instrumental in grooming us for our future as docile slaves under the boot of a tyrannical Chinese Communist-style all-powerful bureaucracy.

    …Continued in the next installment of “COVID-1984?…


    Some Facts You’re Not Hearing That Might Dampen Your Enthusiasm for a Shot of COVID-19 Vaccine
    Posted at 2:45 pm on October 9, 2020
    by Michael Thau

    https://www.redstate.com/michael_tha.../10/09/933850/
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  12. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    Once people are conditioned to wearing harmful masks, Bill Gates’ mandatory harmful vaccine will be a snap.

    Socialists began abolishing individual liberties incrementally back in 1913. Now I notice that globalists and their media stooges are engaging in worldwide incrementalism. Anything Socialists/Communists implement in a foreign country, Americans will get as sure as night follows day.


    The Supreme Court in Brazil has issued a ruling that could see state and local governments mandate the coronavirus vaccine, with the authority to issue fines and/or restrictions to those who refuse it.

    Reuters reports that “Brazilians could be ‘required, but not forced’ by civil authorities to be vaccinated.

    Force comes later. Note the definition of require:


    require (verb, transitive)
    required, requiring, requires
    Abbr. req.

    1. To have as a requisite; need: Most plants require sunlight.

    2. To call for as obligatory or appropriate; demand. See synonyms at demand.

    3. To impose an obligation on; compel: Students are required to attend classes.

    requirable (adjective)
    requirer (noun)



    Supreme Court Justice Ricardo Lewandowski wrote in the majority ruling that individuals refusing to take vaccines could face sanctions, such as the inability to partake in certain activities or to frequent certain locations.


    The report adds:

    Ten justices out of the 11-member court voted in favour of mandatory inoculation, with only one voting against it Thursday.

    While a vaccine has not yet been approved in the country, polls indicate that around one-fifth of Brazilians do not intend to get a shot.

    Among the skeptics is President Jair Bolsonaro, who has repeatedly warned of side effects from vaccinations and declared he is opposed to them.

    If Brazilians are anything like Americans they cannot stop mandatory inoculation after the SCOTUS legislates it.


    “Nobody can force anybody to take the vaccine,”
    Bolsonaro said following the court’s decision, adding “We’re dealing with lives, where is our freedom?”

    Sizeable numbers of Brazillians have continued to protest against the prospect of mandatory vaccinations, with Bolsonaro vowing not to buy any coronavirus vaccines, in contrast with the federal health ministry announcing in October that it intends to secure 46 million doses.


    Brazil: Supreme Court Rules COVID Vaccine Can Be MANDATORY
    Published on 18 December, 2020
    Steve Watson

    https://summit.news/2020/12/18/brazi...ign=syndicated

    I am betting that our High Court judges will vote for mandatory vaccinations even if Biden-Harris do not steal the election and pack the court. In fact legislation is not needed. Every elected Democrat using their unconstitutional authority to lock down cities and states can also order mandatory vaccinations.

    Finally, I can see the standard media bullshit coming down the pike “America is a nation of laws.” —— especially when the New World Order crowd demands it.
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

Similar Threads

  1. Who is getting the H1N1 Vaccine?
    By Chapdog in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 05-11-2020, 08:45 AM
  2. Michael Finn’s Vaccine
    By Flanders in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-26-2020, 09:34 AM
  3. Vaccine by September?
    By Tranquillus in Exile in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 04-21-2020, 06:45 AM
  4. APP - new whooping cough vaccine not as effective as previous vaccine
    By Don Quixote in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-17-2012, 12:13 AM
  5. HIV vaccine
    By FUCK THE POLICE in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 09-30-2009, 02:13 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •