Has the left shown that we should repeal the 1st Amendment?

[MarcusA]

I'm tempted to argue that the left, lacking any virtue or morality to speak of, has made the case for why the 1st Amendment can no longer be viable in a God-fearing society.

It's been shown that the left, if "left" to their own devices will simply use and abuse it in the name of inferior heathen pleasures and pursuits, whether childish porn addictions, spreading lies and misinformation, or other rather deleterious things which those of a righteous and Godly mind would naturally find repellant and repulsive.

At this point, I believe that repelling the 1st Amendment may be the next step in the right direction; "frees peach" in public should be limited solely to that speech which helps to build a Kingdom of God on earth, elect candidates known for their righteous values and virtues.

The use and abuse of "speech" to promote degenerate and inferior causes, such as helping to elect left-wing candidates, promote social ills such as abortion, sodomy, "transgender" rights, racist and sexist "identity politics" and other things that only the base, the vulgar, and the bestial would find interesting, akin to a feral dog licking up its own vomit, since it lacks the palate and discretion by which a man or woman of superior taste and refinement would find in a healthy meal.

Much akin to a spoiled child or untamed animal, it is apparent that the left simply cannot be trusted to speak, or to be able to produce anything other than feral grunts and groans which no women or man of higher virtue, vocabulary, and character would even find being worthy of calling "speech" to begin with.

So yes, it is time to remove the archaic notion of "frees speech" from the base and vile underclass left, the atheist, the heathen, the inferior, much like gleaning wheat from chaff, or the body's immune system removing toxins, to remove and censor such inferior speech is merely to cleanse, to purify, to enlighten the lost and the damned in the right direction. Such a thing is, therefore ultimately autlristic, not oppressive at all, and those who'd diagree have no opinion worth uttering to begin with, let alone one that the virtuous should bother to consider.

[StoneByStone]

I'm tempted to argue that the left, lacking any virtue or morality to speak of, has made the case for why the 1st Amendment can no longer be viable in a God-fearing society.

It's been shown that the left, if "left" to their own devices will simply use and abuse it in the name of inferior heathen pleasures and pursuits, whether childish porn addictions, spreading lies and misinformation, or other rather deleterious things which those of a righteous and Godly mind would naturally find repellant and repulsive.

At this point, I believe that repelling the 1st Amendment may be the next step in the right direction; "frees peach" in public should be limited solely to that speech which helps to build a Kingdom of God on earth, elect candidates known for their righteous values and virtues.

The use and abuse of "speech" to promote degenerate and inferior causes, such as helping to elect left-wing candidates, promote social ills such as abortion, sodomy, "transgender" rights, racist and sexist "identity politics" and other things that only the base, the vulgar, and the bestial would find interesting, akin to a feral dog licking up its own vomit, since it lacks the palate and discretion by which a man or woman of superior taste and refinement would find in a healthy meal.

Much akin to a spoiled child or untamed animal, it is apparent that the left simply cannot be trusted to speak, or to be able to produce anything other than feral grunts and groans which no women or man of higher virtue, vocabulary, and character would even find being worthy of calling "speech" to begin with.

So yes, it is time to remove the archaic notion of "frees speech" from the base and vile underclass left, the atheist, the heathen, the inferior, much like gleaning wheat from chaff, or the body's immune system removing toxins, to remove and censor such inferior speech is merely to cleanse, to purify, to enlighten the lost and the damned in the right direction. Such a thing is, therefore ultimately autlristic, not oppressive at all, and those who'd diagree have no opinion worth uttering to begin with, let alone one that the virtuous should bother to consider.

So-called "moderate" Conservatives are always just a few steps away from Fascism.

[MarcusA]

So-called "moderate" Conservatives are always just a few steps away from Fascism.

One of the problems is that the bare minimum requirement for literacy and voting has been extended in recent years via mass education; with the national average sadly being something along the lines of the 6th grade reading level (this is why the Democrats are able to churn out voters who otherwise may not have been able to meet the bare minimum qualifications)

In times past, literacy was much more exclusive to the well-born (those born into good families, like the Framers, or those rare individuals with prodigious abilities).

If literacy or intelligence tests of some kind were able to be re-instituted, this might help move the voting system back in a good direction, and put the Democrat party out of business as far as "underclass or inner-city voting" is concerned.

Either that, or just repeal the popular vote altogether, and let the electoral college handpick the POTUS from now on; the Democrats have shown why this system is broken, and enabled people have no business voting able to participate in politics. lolol

[StoneByStone]

One of the problems is that the bare minimum requirement for literacy and voting has been extended in recent years via mass education; with the national average sadly being something along the lines of the 6th grade reading level (this is why the Democrats are able to churn out voters who otherwise may not have been able to meet the bare minimum qualifications)

In times past, literacy was much more exclusive to the well-born (those born into good families, like the Framers, or those rare individuals with prodigious abilities).

If literacy or intelligence tests of some kind were able to be re-instituted, this might help move the voting system back in a good direction, and put the Democrat party out of business as far as "underclass or inner-city voting" is concerned.

Either that, or just repeal the popular vote altogether, and let the electoral college handpick the POTUS from now on; the Democrats have shown why this system is broken, and enabled people have no business voting able to participate in politics. lolol

So no freedom of speech and no Democracy. Keep going, I like when people prove my point.

[archives]

One of the problems is that the bare minimum requirement for literacy and voting has been extended in recent years via mass education; with the national average sadly being something along the lines of the 6th grade reading level (this is why the Democrats are able to churn out voters who otherwise may not have been able to meet the bare minimum qualifications)

In times past, literacy was much more exclusive to the well-born (those born into good families, like the Framers, or those rare individuals with prodigious abilities).

If literacy or intelligence tests of some kind were able to be re-instituted, this might help move the voting system back in a good direction, and put the Democrat party out of business as far as "underclass or inner-city voting" is concerned.

Either that, or just repeal the popular vote altogether, and let the electoral college handpick the POTUS from now on; the Democrats have shown why this system is broken, and enabled people have no business voting able to participate in politics. lolol

[blades]

So-called "moderate" Conservatives are always just a few steps away from Fascism.

and yet leftist democrats past being fascist a long time ago and are on their way to full communist,,,

[Phantasmal]

and yet leftist democrats past being fascist a long time ago and are on their way to full communist,,,

Comedy gold, but keep your day job.

[StoneByStone]

and yet leftist democrats past being fascist a long time ago and are on their way to full communist,,,

Examples?

[blades]

Comedy gold, but keep your day job.

the best comedy is based on actual events,,,

so thanks,,,

[Charoite]

I'm tempted to argue that the left, lacking any virtue or morality to speak of, has made the case for why the 1st Amendment can no longer be viable in a God-fearing society.

It's been shown that the left, if "left" to their own devices will simply use and abuse it in the name of inferior heathen pleasures and pursuits, whether childish porn addictions, spreading lies and misinformation, or other rather deleterious things which those of a righteous and Godly mind would naturally find repellant and repulsive.

At this point, I believe that repelling the 1st Amendment may be the next step in the right direction; "frees peach" in public should be limited solely to that speech which helps to build a Kingdom of God on earth, elect candidates known for their righteous values and virtues.

The use and abuse of "speech" to promote degenerate and inferior causes, such as helping to elect left-wing candidates, promote social ills such as abortion, sodomy, "transgender" rights, racist and sexist "identity politics" and other things that only the base, the vulgar, and the bestial would find interesting, akin to a feral dog licking up its own vomit, since it lacks the palate and discretion by which a man or woman of superior taste and refinement would find in a healthy meal.

Much akin to a spoiled child or untamed animal, it is apparent that the left simply cannot be trusted to speak, or to be able to produce anything other than feral grunts and groans which no women or man of higher virtue, vocabulary, and character would even find being worthy of calling "speech" to begin with.

So yes, it is time to remove the archaic notion of "frees speech" from the base and vile underclass left, the atheist, the heathen, the inferior, much like gleaning wheat from chaff, or the body's immune system removing toxins, to remove and censor such inferior speech is merely to cleanse, to purify, to enlighten the lost and the damned in the right direction. Such a thing is, therefore ultimately autlristic, not oppressive at all, and those who'd diagree have no opinion worth uttering to begin with, let alone one that the virtuous should bother to consider.

Go sleep it off, shitposter. Are you trolling or just actually that dim? With your obvious abrasive behavior, I'd vote both. Your stupid ideas go both ways and it doesn't take a genius to know who a secular society would silence first. It's why we have these things, to begin with. Go build your own cult society on some remote island. You can have your totalitarian ideas there since you don't want to live in a country with religious liberty and would prefer religious indoctrinations like the ones American's first left England over.

[blades]

Examples?

just read their platform,,,and if repubes are on the right and dems the left by definition their are further along the totalitarian path,,,

[StoneByStone]

just read their platform,,,and if repubes are on the right and dems the left by definition their are further along the totalitarian path,,,

Give me examples of how their platform is Fascist.

The Left is Democracy and the Right is Authoritarianism. That's how it was defined in the French Revolution.

[blades]

Give me examples of how their platform is Fascist.

The Left is Democracy and the Right is Authoritarianism. That's how it was defined in the French Revolution.

not in this country,,

the far left is total government and far right is anarchy with the constitution sitting about in the middle,,
and since both dems and repubs=es are for more government than allowed by the constitution they are both leftist,,,

at least thats how the founders constructed it,,,

[Cancel 2020.2]

I'm tempted to argue that the left, lacking any virtue or morality to speak of, has made the case for why the 1st Amendment can no longer be viable in a God-fearing society.

It's been shown that the left, if "left" to their own devices will simply use and abuse it in the name of inferior heathen pleasures and pursuits, whether childish porn addictions, spreading lies and misinformation, or other rather deleterious things which those of a righteous and Godly mind would naturally find repellant and repulsive.

At this point, I believe that repelling the 1st Amendment may be the next step in the right direction; "frees peach" in public should be limited solely to that speech which helps to build a Kingdom of God on earth, elect candidates known for their righteous values and virtues.

The use and abuse of "speech" to promote degenerate and inferior causes, such as helping to elect left-wing candidates, promote social ills such as abortion, sodomy, "transgender" rights, racist and sexist "identity politics" and other things that only the base, the vulgar, and the bestial would find interesting, akin to a feral dog licking up its own vomit, since it lacks the palate and discretion by which a man or woman of superior taste and refinement would find in a healthy meal.

Much akin to a spoiled child or untamed animal, it is apparent that the left simply cannot be trusted to speak, or to be able to produce anything other than feral grunts and groans which no women or man of higher virtue, vocabulary, and character would even find being worthy of calling "speech" to begin with.

So yes, it is time to remove the archaic notion of "frees speech" from the base and vile underclass left, the atheist, the heathen, the inferior, much like gleaning wheat from chaff, or the body's immune system removing toxins, to remove and censor such inferior speech is merely to cleanse, to purify, to enlighten the lost and the damned in the right direction. Such a thing is, therefore ultimately autlristic, not oppressive at all, and those who'd diagree have no opinion worth uttering to begin with, let alone one that the virtuous should bother to consider.

Thanks for ANOTHER fine post, Marcus.

[StoneByStone]

not in this country,,

the far left is total government and far right is anarchy with the constitution sitting about in the middle,,
and since both dems and repubs=es are for more government than allowed by the constitution they are both leftist,,,

at least thats how the founders constructed it,,,

So here in the real world, the Far-Left is Anarchy because they spread wealth and power more evenly throughout society. The Far-Right pretends to be about "small government" but is actually about using the government to concentrate wealth and power within the 1%.
This is why Conservatives are so quick to accept Fascist laws like Trump's recent decision to jail people who burn the flag.

Today's Republicans are the ideological result of the French right-wing that tried to keep France from having Democracy.