Evmetro (07-09-2020)
I'm tempted to argue that, yes, it would be in the vested interest of the state to ban atheists from procreating, as well as to confiscate the children from atheist homes, and redistribute them to homes, such as Christian homes, grounded in some measure of morality or virtue.
An atheist, by mere virtue of it's own inferiority cannot be trusted around children, let alone allowed to have children of its own; for example, to an atheist, rape, murder, child molestations are not evils or moral ills, they are just alternate 'lifestyle preferences', or perhaps even a good thing.
So why on earth would we allow those to have children who can't even morally object to raping and harming children without stealing and appropriating Christian and "religious" morality?
---
So sorry atheists, ultimately your children are not yours anyway, they are first and foremost the children of God Almighty. And it is therefore the natural right and duty of a God-fearing state to remove them from you, and educate them in virtue, Christianity, and morality, as opposed to degeneracy, atheism, and vice and those ills which can lead a soul in the direction of hellfire. To allow an atheist, pagan, heathen, or other Godless ilk in the company of children is a rather heinous sin which should not be allowed unchecked.
Evmetro (07-09-2020)
No
I think we should license and regulate parentage, like we do other rights.
WATERMARK, GREATEST OF THE TRINITY, ON CHIK-FIL-A
www.gunsbeerfreedom.blogspot.com
www.gunsbeerfreedom.blogspot.com
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Charoite (07-09-2020), Guno צְבִי (07-09-2020), ThatOwlWoman (07-09-2020)
Charoite (07-09-2020)
Guno צְבִי (07-09-2020)
Hell no, if anything, vaccine propagandists should be thrown in jail for misleading the public with their corporate propaganda and salesmanship.
There have been plenty of vaccine manufacturer lawsuits due to potentially harmful product defects:
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/recalls.html
https://www.youtube.com
"Anti-vaxxer" is just a stupid person term for "anything they don't like" and should be publicly ridiculed (along with the idiots who don't even know the difference between "medicine" and/or the "medical" industries, and the "natural sciences").
why did we let atheists kidnap all those children in the first place?......
Isaiah 6:5
“Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”
MarcusA (07-09-2020)
In the most concise manner, there are four positions you can have on religion. You can be a"
Theist. You believe there is something greater than yourself in the universe-- a God or Gods, or something equivalent to that. You have no absolute proof but point to evidence that you see makes it believable.
Agnostic. You're not sure whether there is a god, gods, or not. You're on the fence and need more convincing.
Secular: You're position on religion is Don't know, don't care. For you the existence or nonexistence of some higher deity or being is irrelevant.
Then there's Atheist: This is the reverse of theist. You believe there is nothing greater than you in the universe. God (little g) doesn't exist. You know that with equal religious fervor to the position of a theist and offer evidence you are correct.
The problem with Atheism is the same one with much of pop science. It's like Gorebal Warming believers argue, "The science is settled!" That, I'm right, you can STFU, and that ends it. It's the identical argument many theists use God said it, I believe it, end of argument. It doesn't leave room to be wrong or accept that there might be alternatives. For the Atheist there can't be anything more to the universe than what is observable. This makes Atheism the position of denial and kind of crazy. It argues that billions upon billions of humans over countless societies and millennia all got theism wrong. But, since you can't prove a negative, being unable to accept there could be something greater than yourself leaves you painted into a corner.
The other three positions are rational. Atheism is irrational.
Bookmarks