Page 1 of 13 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 188

Thread: Why atheists, Satanists, heathens, etc can't be Americans or Westerners

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Posts
    267
    Thanks
    25
    Thanked 32 Times in 26 Posts
    Groans
    66
    Groaned 22 Times in 17 Posts

    Default Why atheists, Satanists, heathens, etc can't be Americans or Westerners

    The Common Law in the US is based off of "religious" morality and values.

    For example, not only rape, murder and things of that nature "sins" in Christianty and world religions, but are also "crimes" under "secular" law; with "secular law" having developed or evolved out of older religious and legal systems, such as Roman, Exodus, and so on.

    An atheist, for example, can't have any objection to murder, rape and things of that nature except on faith, or on stealing and appropriating those moral values and axioms from world religions (much as degenerate heathen "religions" and cults such as "Satanism" have no morality to speak of which is compatible with that that of law, society and so forth).

    So yes, I'd argue based on these facts, state and federal can and should, indeed favor Christianity (and monotheistic, world religion with compatible values) both in public and private over inferior and socially unacceptable trash such as atheism, Satanism and so forth, rather than pretending that such filth and worthlessness is in anyway "equal" to them, when it is decidedly inferior, and has no right to exist it all.

  2. The Following 2 Users Groan At MarcusA For This Awful Post:

    AProudLefty (07-08-2020), Charoite (07-08-2020)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    7,177
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2,099 Times in 1,499 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 812 Times in 726 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MarcusA View Post
    The Common Law in the US is based off of "religious" morality and values.

    For example, not only rape, murder and things of that nature "sins" in Christianty and world religions, but are also "crimes" under "secular" law; with "secular law" having developed or evolved out of older religious and legal systems, such as Roman, Exodus, and so on.

    An atheist, for example, can't have any objection to murder, rape and things of that nature except on faith, or on stealing and appropriating those moral values and axioms from world religions (much as degenerate heathen "religions" and cults such as "Satanism" have no morality to speak of which is compatible with that that of law, society and so forth).

    So yes, I'd argue based on these facts, state and federal can and should, indeed favor Christianity (and monotheistic, world religion with compatible values) both in public and private over inferior and socially unacceptable trash such as atheism, Satanism and so forth, rather than pretending that such filth and worthlessness is in anyway "equal" to them, when it is decidedly inferior, and has no right to exist it all.

    You're nuts.

  4. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to jacksonsprat22 For This Post:

    Guno צְבִי (07-08-2020), ThatOwlWoman (07-08-2020), Trumpet (07-08-2020)

  5. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Posts
    267
    Thanks
    25
    Thanked 32 Times in 26 Posts
    Groans
    66
    Groaned 22 Times in 17 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jacksonsprat22 View Post
    You're nuts.
    Oh really?

    An atheist can't have any objection to rape, murder, or other immoral acts by virtue of some "lack of belief in a God".

    He can only steal or culturally appropriate those moral axioms from religion, of course.

    So yes, a monotheistic religion which prohibits rape and murder as immoral, is decidedly more compatible and acceptable with our Law than a weak and effeminate little atheist who has no morality to speak of beyond that perhaps of a beast, or what he has stolen from his moral and religious superiors.

  6. The Following User Groans At MarcusA For This Awful Post:

    Charoite (07-08-2020)

  7. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    7,177
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2,099 Times in 1,499 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 812 Times in 726 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MarcusA View Post
    Oh really?

    An atheist can't have any objection to rape, murder, or other immoral acts by virtue of some "lack of belief in a God".

    He can only steal or culturally appropriate those moral axioms from religion, of course.

    So yes, a monotheistic religion which prohibits rape and murder as immoral, is decidedly more compatible and acceptable with our Law than a weak and effeminate little atheist who has no morality to speak of beyond that perhaps of a beast, or what he has stolen from his moral and religious superiors.
    Aristotle had ethics. The ancient Greeks had ethics. Did not rely on the Christian God.

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jacksonsprat22 For This Post:

    Guno צְבִי (07-08-2020), Saudade (07-10-2020)

  9. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    5,757
    Thanks
    3,941
    Thanked 3,338 Times in 2,286 Posts
    Groans
    827
    Groaned 633 Times in 549 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MarcusA View Post
    The Common Law in the US is based off of "religious" morality and values.

    For example, not only rape, murder and things of that nature "sins" in Christianty and world religions, but are also "crimes" under "secular" law; with "secular law" having developed or evolved out of older religious and legal systems, such as Roman, Exodus, and so on.

    An atheist, for example, can't have any objection to murder, rape and things of that nature except on faith, or on stealing and appropriating those moral values and axioms from world religions (much as degenerate heathen "religions" and cults such as "Satanism" have no morality to speak of which is compatible with that that of law, society and so forth).

    So yes, I'd argue based on these facts, state and federal can and should, indeed favor Christianity (and monotheistic, world religion with compatible values) both in public and private over inferior and socially unacceptable trash such as atheism, Satanism and so forth, rather than pretending that such filth and worthlessness is in anyway "equal" to them, when it is decidedly inferior, and has no right to exist it all.
    What you wrote is nuts. I'm a very non-secular Christian by the way. Your basis defies the Christian path and what it means. It is abrasive in condemnation and its means to indoctrinate.

  10. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Charoite For This Post:

    Cypress (07-09-2020), Iolo/Penderyn (07-09-2020), ThatOwlWoman (07-09-2020), Trumpet (07-08-2020)

  11. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Posts
    267
    Thanks
    25
    Thanked 32 Times in 26 Posts
    Groans
    66
    Groaned 22 Times in 17 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Crocodile View Post
    What you wrote is nuts. I'm a very non-secular Christian by the way. Your basis defies the Christian path and what it means. It is abrasive in condemnation and its means to indoctrinate.
    The point is that atheists than those with no morality to speak of beyond that of a beast or dog can't be trusted to govern or regulate themselves without the aid of a comparatively enlightened individual, so to indoctrinate them in to the right and moral superior way and path is the duty of the god-fearing and enlightened, much akin to a shepherd hearing a flock of sheep, who would otherwise be lost if left to their own devices.

  12. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    7,177
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2,099 Times in 1,499 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 812 Times in 726 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MarcusA View Post
    The point is that atheists than those with no morality to speak of beyond that of a beast or dog can't be trusted to govern or regulate themselves without the aid of a comparatively enlightened individual, so to indoctrinate them in to the right and moral superior way and path is the duty of the god-fearing and enlightened, much akin to a shepherd hearing a flock of sheep, who would otherwise be lost if left to their own devices.
    You are a fundamentalist.

  13. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    86,919
    Thanks
    35,051
    Thanked 21,761 Times in 17,091 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,342 Times in 2,261 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MarcusA View Post
    The Common Law in the US is based off of "religious" morality and values.

    For example, not only rape, murder and things of that nature "sins" in Christianty and world religions, but are also "crimes" under "secular" law; with "secular law" having developed or evolved out of older religious and legal systems, such as Roman, Exodus, and so on.

    An atheist, for example, can't have any objection to murder, rape and things of that nature except on faith, or on stealing and appropriating those moral values and axioms from world religions (much as degenerate heathen "religions" and cults such as "Satanism" have no morality to speak of which is compatible with that that of law, society and so forth).

    So yes, I'd argue based on these facts, state and federal can and should, indeed favor Christianity (and monotheistic, world religion with compatible values) both in public and private over inferior and socially unacceptable trash such as atheism, Satanism and so forth, rather than pretending that such filth and worthlessness is in anyway "equal" to them, when it is decidedly inferior, and has no right to exist it all.
    Bad thread is bad.

  14. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Posts
    267
    Thanks
    25
    Thanked 32 Times in 26 Posts
    Groans
    66
    Groaned 22 Times in 17 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jacksonsprat22 View Post
    You are a fundamentalist.
    So why should one who by virtue of their own views claim any moral qualm against rape, murder, child molestation, and vile things of said nature.

    I see no reason why such and individual should be presumed to have any rights or means of self-governance; they should merely be quarreled and chatteled like the feral animals which they have so much more in common with than a comparatively enlightened man or woman.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to MarcusA For This Post:

    Evmetro (07-08-2020)

  16. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    7,177
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2,099 Times in 1,499 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 812 Times in 726 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MarcusA View Post
    So why should one who by virtue of their own views claim any moral qualm against rape, murder, child molestation, and vile things of said nature.

    I see no reason why such and individual should be presumed to have any rights or means of self-governance; they should merely be quarreled and chatteled like the feral animals which they have so much more in common with than a comparatively enlightened man or woman.

    What atheist said murder is good?

  17. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    28,403
    Thanks
    26,104
    Thanked 11,856 Times in 8,415 Posts
    Groans
    18
    Groaned 2,290 Times in 2,172 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MarcusA View Post
    The Common Law in the US is based off of "religious" morality and values.

    For example, not only rape, murder and things of that nature "sins" in Christianty and world religions, but are also "crimes" under "secular" law; with "secular law" having developed or evolved out of older religious and legal systems, such as Roman, Exodus, and so on.

    An atheist, for example, can't have any objection to murder, rape and things of that nature except on faith, or on stealing and appropriating those moral values and axioms from world religions (much as degenerate heathen "religions" and cults such as "Satanism" have no morality to speak of which is compatible with that that of law, society and so forth).

    So yes, I'd argue based on these facts, state and federal can and should, indeed favor Christianity (and monotheistic, world religion with compatible values) both in public and private over inferior and socially unacceptable trash such as atheism, Satanism and so forth, rather than pretending that such filth and worthlessness is in anyway "equal" to them, when it is decidedly inferior, and has no right to exist it all.
    Are you referring to right wing Christianity ??????????????????

  18. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    28,403
    Thanks
    26,104
    Thanked 11,856 Times in 8,415 Posts
    Groans
    18
    Groaned 2,290 Times in 2,172 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MarcusA View Post
    The point is that atheists than those with no morality to speak of beyond that of a beast or dog can't be trusted to govern or regulate themselves without the aid of a comparatively enlightened individual, so to indoctrinate them in to the right and moral superior way and path is the duty of the god-fearing and enlightened, much akin to a shepherd hearing a flock of sheep, who would otherwise be lost if left to their own devices.
    That sure sounds like Donald Trump????

  19. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    28,403
    Thanks
    26,104
    Thanked 11,856 Times in 8,415 Posts
    Groans
    18
    Groaned 2,290 Times in 2,172 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MarcusA View Post
    Oh really?

    An atheist can't have any objection to rape, murder, or other immoral acts by virtue of some "lack of belief in a God".

    He can only steal or culturally appropriate those moral axioms from religion, of course.

    So yes, a monotheistic religion which prohibits rape and murder as immoral, is decidedly more compatible and acceptable with our Law than a weak and effeminate little atheist who has no morality to speak of beyond that perhaps of a beast, or what he has stolen from his moral and religious superiors.
    Donald Trump has sexually harassed women and has swindled many people, does this sentence include him???????????

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to Trumpet For This Post:

    ThatOwlWoman (07-09-2020)

  21. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    9,164
    Thanks
    3,635
    Thanked 6,593 Times in 4,192 Posts
    Groans
    130
    Groaned 1,203 Times in 1,060 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jacksonsprat22 View Post
    You're nuts.
    No, not nuts...just downright dumb!
    BLUEXIT
    A Modest Proposal For Separating Blue States From Red

    Dear Red-State Trump Voter,
    Let’s face it, guys: We’re done.


    It is a tragedy that so much of the work that so many men and women toiled at for so long to make this a better country, and a better world, has been thrown away, leaving us all in such needless peril.

    This is why our separation in all but name is necessary.


    https://newrepublic.com/article/1409...mp-red-america

  22. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    7,177
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2,099 Times in 1,499 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 812 Times in 726 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cinnabar View Post
    No, not nuts...just downright dumb!
    Fair enough.

Similar Threads

  1. Iran Is Imprisoning More Americans and Westerners
    By anatta in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-14-2016, 10:38 AM
  2. This is the way to deal with the Satanists
    By Conservative in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-29-2013, 02:40 PM
  3. Illuminati Satanists
    By Hermes Thoth in forum Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories Forum
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 06-21-2007, 12:41 PM
  4. Question for Liberal Heathens
    By Augustine in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 82
    Last Post: 02-28-2007, 03:04 PM
  5. Question For Conservative Heathens
    By OrnotBitwise in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 01-31-2007, 10:23 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •