Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 24 of 24

Thread: Is ignoring COVID a good national strategy?

  1. #16 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    22,864
    Thanks
    1,440
    Thanked 15,405 Times in 9,440 Posts
    Groans
    101
    Groaned 1,894 Times in 1,783 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by floridafan View Post
    There are barely 500,000 deaths worldwide, you pathetic idiot.
    Oh, you and your facts.

  2. #17 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Ravenhenge in the Northwoods
    Posts
    89,072
    Thanks
    146,988
    Thanked 83,422 Times in 53,288 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 4,661 Times in 4,380 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BartenderElite View Post
    First: does anyone dispute that this is now the admin's stance? To me, it's obvious. If Trump could, I think he'd even get rid of what testing we have, just so we could more easily ignore the cases that are out there.

    I haven't heard the admin articulate the reasoning for this strategy, but some surrogates have tried: we have to just let the virus run its course, and build "herd immunity."

    Since we don't know how long immunity from having the virus lasts, and in fact could be a short period of time: is that a good national strategy? Other countries (and some notable U.S. states) have been able to re-open responsibly - containing the virus, while getting their economies moving again. Why wouldn't we emulate that?
    There is some evidence that herd immunity may not be possible with this virus, as antibody protection wanes after recovery.

    https://www.the-scientist.com/news-o...tibodies-67650

    We would do well to emulate those successful countries by mandating masks, social distancing, safety procedures for businesses to follow, and so on. But we have way too many think-they-know-it-all morons here, both in the citizenry and in government.
    "Conservatism is the blind and fear-filled worship of dead radicals." -- Mark Twain

  3. #18 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    23,504
    Thanks
    4,281
    Thanked 10,263 Times in 7,145 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 1,197 Times in 1,112 Posts

    Default


  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Geeko Sportivo For This Post:

    moon (07-07-2020)

  5. #19 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    23,504
    Thanks
    4,281
    Thanked 10,263 Times in 7,145 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 1,197 Times in 1,112 Posts

    Default


  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Geeko Sportivo For This Post:

    moon (07-07-2020)

  7. #20 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    23,504
    Thanks
    4,281
    Thanked 10,263 Times in 7,145 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 1,197 Times in 1,112 Posts

    Default


  8. #21 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    23,504
    Thanks
    4,281
    Thanked 10,263 Times in 7,145 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 1,197 Times in 1,112 Posts

    Default


  9. #22 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    45,155
    Thanks
    9,829
    Thanked 7,426 Times in 5,873 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 6,519 Times in 6,260 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Scary.
    " First they came for the journalists...
    We don't know what happened after that . "

    Maria Ressa.

  10. #23 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    23,504
    Thanks
    4,281
    Thanked 10,263 Times in 7,145 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 1,197 Times in 1,112 Posts

    Default


  11. #24 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    9,083
    Thanks
    2,345
    Thanked 3,121 Times in 2,441 Posts
    Groans
    200
    Groaned 265 Times in 242 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BartenderElite View Post
    First: does anyone dispute that this is now the admin's stance? To me, it's obvious. If Trump could, I think he'd even get rid of what testing we have, just so we could more easily ignore the cases that are out there.

    I haven't heard the admin articulate the reasoning for this strategy, but some surrogates have tried: we have to just let the virus run its course, and build "herd immunity."

    Since we don't know how long immunity from having the virus lasts, and in fact could be a short period of time: is that a good national strategy? Other countries (and some notable U.S. states) have been able to re-open responsibly - containing the virus, while getting their economies moving again. Why wouldn't we emulate that?
    I don't know if it the best strategy. I don't know that is not the best strategy either. It may very well be that mother nature is going to run her course, regardless of what we do.
    The Truth Does Not Need To Be Supported With Censorship.

Similar Threads

  1. A good take on the Covid-19 situation.
    By Taichiliberal in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-19-2020, 09:12 PM
  2. If Prez Doing Such A Good Job, Why Does USA Have Most Covid?
    By PoliTalker in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 117
    Last Post: 04-01-2020, 07:31 PM
  3. Trump outlines new national security strategy
    By anatta in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 12-18-2017, 05:28 PM
  4. Good strategy
    By FUCK THE POLICE in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-29-2010, 08:22 PM
  5. The National Security Strategy of the United States of America
    By Care4all in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 08-03-2007, 09:26 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •