What is racist about the Redskins name

[AProudLefty]

Dims????

Shitskins, blackskins, whiteskins, reptileskins, albinoskins, orangeskins, and so on.

[Sailor]

Shitskins, blackskins, whiteskins, reptileskins, albinoskins, orangeskins, and so on.

You have a problem with sharkskins or something? Hmmm!

[ThatOwlWoman]

Breaking News: The Smurfs' attorney has contacted the St. Louis Blues with a formal request to change the team name, or face legal repercussions.

^ The gist of the OP.

[AProudLefty]

Honestly,..... sports teams shouldnt really be named after Indians anyway. IMO you want sports teams to be named after something or someone that represents winning. Indians lost terribly, routed in fact. Not good,....doesnt represent winning....

Its like naming a team the Hillary's, or the Titanics. Doesnt make any sense.

Good point. We should rename it to Covids.

[Hawkeye10]

There is nothing wrong with the name, and at least till recently the majority of America Indians have agreed with me.

It is gone though, tossed overboard on the project of get some of us to UTOPIA.

The rest of us will be tossed overboard along the way.

We are not good enough.

[AProudLefty]

You have a problem with sharkskins or something? Hmmm!

Hey I think sharkskins are cool!!!

[Bourbon]

God is Watching ... and will decide if they ever Win another Superbowl

[AProudLefty]

Apparently the bigfoot has a problem with the term.

[domer76]

Why do people call them NATIVE Americans when science says they crossed the polar regions from Asia to get here. Wouldnt that make them NOT native by definition? Inquiring minds want to know.....

^Stupid question du jour.

Congrats, Cletus.

[domer76]

Honestly,..... sports teams shouldnt really be named after Indians anyway. IMO you want sports teams to be named after something or someone that represents winning. Indians lost terribly, routed in fact. Not good,....doesnt represent winning....

Its like naming a team the Hillary's, or the Titanics. Doesnt make any sense.

They refer to it as genocide, not “losing”, fucking asshole.

[volsrock]

They refer to it as genocide, not “losing”, fucking asshole.

So the North U.S. and Grant committed genocide on the people of the South? Stupid Fuck

[AProudLefty]

So the North U.S. committed genocide on the people of the South? Stupid Fuck

That's called war, dumbfuck.

[volsrock]

That's called war, dumbfuck.

So was the US and the Indians, ass eater

The American Indian Wars (also known as the Indian Wars or in Canada, the First Nations Wars; French: Guerres des Premières Nations) is the collective name for the various armed conflicts that were fought by European governments and colonists, and later by the United States and Canadian governments and American and Canadian settlers, against various American Indian and First Nation tribes.

[domer76]

So the North U.S. committed genocide on the people of the South? Stupid Fuck

Sure they did, Jethro. You just took over first place for the stupidest fucking posts of the day, halfwit. And that was some tough competition, too. Somehow, however, you managed to out-stupid your fellow idiot.

[AProudLefty]

So was the US and the Indians, ass eater

The American Indian Wars (also known as the Indian Wars or in Canada, the First Nations Wars; French: Guerres des Premières Nations) is the collective name for the various armed conflicts that were fought by European governments and colonists, and later by the United States and Canadian governments and American and Canadian settlers, against various American Indian and First Nation tribes.

Guns vs. bows? God you're dumb.