Members banned from this thread: katzgar


Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Strzok Memo the Rosetta Stone of Obamagate

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    52,794
    Thanks
    13,341
    Thanked 22,579 Times in 15,814 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,951 Times in 1,862 Posts

    Default Strzok Memo the Rosetta Stone of Obamagate

    it seems like it was months ago when the D.C. Court of Appeals ordered Judge Emmet Sullivan to dismiss the case against former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, but it was actually less than two weeks ago.
    June 24 to be exact, but to Flynn it probably seems like forever.
    No word from Sullivan about whether he intends to follow the order of the senior court, or continue to stall in an effort to punish Lt. Gen. Flynn for his political crime of supporting President Trump.
    But based on his record so far, Sullivan can probably be counted on to drag his feet while thumbing his nose at justice.

    t doesn’t seem to matter to the mainstream media that evidence has mounted into the stratosphere that Trump has been right all along about his campaign being illegally surveilled by the Obama administration.
    It doesn’t matter that Trump survived a two-plus year investigation by a special counsel and was cleared of any kind of collusion with the Russians.
    The Democrats and their agents in the Deep State know that whatever they do to harass Trump will be treated as noble and patriotic by the corrupt media, and that whenever evidence surfaces of their criminal behavior it will be promptly buried again.
    Kissinger: “demonization of Vladimir Putin is not a policy; it is an alibi for the absence of one.”
    ________

    Cold War 2.0 Russia hysteria is turning people’s brains into guacamole.
    We’ve got to find a way to snap out of the propaganda trance
    ________

    Buddha: "trust the person who seeks truth and mistrust the person who claims he has found it "
    1.2.3.4.5.6.7. All Good Children Go to Heaven

  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to anatta For This Post:

    Cancel 2020.2 (07-06-2020), Celticguy (07-06-2020), Grokmaster (07-06-2020), Stretch (07-06-2020)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    52,794
    Thanks
    13,341
    Thanked 22,579 Times in 15,814 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,951 Times in 1,862 Posts

    Default

    Which brings us to the infamous handwritten notes by disgraced FBI agent Peter Strzok about a White House meeting that surfaced in a recent filing in the Flynn case.

    The half-page of notes released by Flynn’s defense team rises to the level of a history-altering “Oops!”
    Indeed, it could well be the Rosetta stone that allows us to penetrate the secrets of the anti-Trump conspiracy that stretched from the FBI to the CIA, the Justice Department and the White House.

    The cast of characters in the memo who were in attendance at the White House on Jan. 5, 2017, to discuss how the Obama administration should proceed in its dealings with Flynn, who was accused of playing footsie with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak prior to assuming his official role as national security adviser.
    If so, the notes strongly contradict Susan Rice’s CYA “memo to self” where the Obama national security adviser recounts the Jan. 5 meeting and stresses three times that President Obama and his team were handling the Flynn investigation “by the book.”
    Methinks the lady doth protest too much, especially now that we have Strzok’s contemporaneous notes to contradict her memo, which suspiciously was written in the final minutes of the Obama administration as Donald Trump was being sworn in at the Capitol.

    From what we can tell, Strzok (unlike Rice) was not writing his memo to protect anyone.
    He seems to have merely jotted down some notes about what various participants in the meeting said, including President Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, Rice, Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates and Strzok’s boss — FBI Director James Comey.

    But to see the importance of these notes, we need to transcribe them from the cryptic handwritten notes.
    Words and phrases that are outright guesses are reproduced in brackets.
    Speakers are noted at the beginning of each line. “NSA” stands for Rice. “D” stands for Comey. “DAG” stands for Yates. “VP” stands for Biden. “P” stands for Obama.
    “Cuts” is said to refer to summaries of phone calls monitored under a FISA warrant to collect foreign intelligence.

  4. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to anatta For This Post:

    Cancel 2020.2 (07-06-2020), Grokmaster (07-06-2020), Stretch (07-06-2020)

  5. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    52,794
    Thanks
    13,341
    Thanked 22,579 Times in 15,814 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,951 Times in 1,862 Posts

    Default

    NSA - D - DAG: Flynn cuts. Other [countries].

    D - DAG: Lean forward on [illegible, but possibly “ambass” as in ambassador. Others have speculated on “useless” or “unless,” which don’t fit the context, or “unclass” as in “unclassified” or even a name beginning with m. We just don’t know.]

    VP: “Logan Act”

    P: These are unusual times

    VP: I’ve been on the Intel Committee for 10 years and I never

    P: Make sure you look at thing[s] + have the right people on it

    P: Is there anything I shouldn’t be telling transition team?

    D: Flynn —> Kislyak calls but appear legit.

  6. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to anatta For This Post:

    Bigdog (07-06-2020), Cancel 2020.2 (07-06-2020), Grokmaster (07-06-2020), Stretch (07-06-2020)

  7. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Location
    Valparaiso, Indiana USA
    Posts
    12,308
    Thanks
    12,429
    Thanked 3,406 Times in 2,917 Posts
    Groans
    5,261
    Groaned 325 Times in 306 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anatta View Post
    it seems like it was months ago when the D.C. Court of Appeals ordered Judge Emmet Sullivan to dismiss the case against former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, but it was actually less than two weeks ago.
    June 24 to be exact, but to Flynn it probably seems like forever.
    No word from Sullivan about whether he intends to follow the order of the senior court, or continue to stall in an effort to punish Lt. Gen. Flynn for his political crime of supporting President Trump.
    But based on his record so far, Sullivan can probably be counted on to drag his feet while thumbing his nose at justice.

    t doesn’t seem to matter to the mainstream media that evidence has mounted into the stratosphere that Trump has been right all along about his campaign being illegally surveilled by the Obama administration.
    It doesn’t matter that Trump survived a two-plus year investigation by a special counsel and was cleared of any kind of collusion with the Russians.
    The Democrats and their agents in the Deep State know that whatever they do to harass Trump will be treated as noble and patriotic by the corrupt media, and that whenever evidence surfaces of their criminal behavior it will be promptly buried again.
    Fantastic post. Thank you.

  8. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    52,794
    Thanks
    13,341
    Thanked 22,579 Times in 15,814 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,951 Times in 1,862 Posts

    Default

    confirmation that Biden lied when he said he had nothing to do with the criminal prosecution of Flynn.

    The Logan Act is a more than 200-year-old statute that forbids ordinary Americans from negotiating with foreign governments that have a dispute with the United States. No one has ever been convicted under the law, and Flynn was not an ordinary American, but rather the incoming national security adviser; nonetheless it was a central plank in the plan to give Flynn enough rope to hang himself.
    The fact that quotes appear only around the words Logan Act suggest that this was a direct quote from Biden.

    In addition, the order by Obama presumably to Comey to “have the right people on it” suggests that there was a political element to the investigation and that the president wanted loyalists to handle it.
    What other explanation is there?

    we have a contemporaneous account of the FBI director assuring the president that Flynn’s conversations with Kislyak were “legit.”
    In that case, why did Strzok reveal in an instant message on Jan. 4, 2017, the day before this historic meeting, that the FBI agent in charge should NOT close the case against Flynn even though it should have already been closed because no evidence had accrued against him?


    If Comey thought the general’s conversations with Kislyak were “legit,” then why did Strzok tell another FBI contact that the “7th floor [was] involved” in the decision to keep the Flynn case alive. told his girlfriend Lisa Page, “Our utter incompetence actually helps us.”

  9. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to anatta For This Post:

    Bigdog (07-06-2020), Stretch (07-06-2020)

  10. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Location
    Valparaiso, Indiana USA
    Posts
    12,308
    Thanks
    12,429
    Thanked 3,406 Times in 2,917 Posts
    Groans
    5,261
    Groaned 325 Times in 306 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anatta View Post
    Which brings us to the infamous handwritten notes by disgraced FBI agent Peter Strzok about a White House meeting that surfaced in a recent filing in the Flynn case.

    The half-page of notes released by Flynn’s defense team rises to the level of a history-altering “Oops!”
    Indeed, it could well be the Rosetta stone that allows us to penetrate the secrets of the anti-Trump conspiracy that stretched from the FBI to the CIA, the Justice Department and the White House.

    The cast of characters in the memo who were in attendance at the White House on Jan. 5, 2017, to discuss how the Obama administration should proceed in its dealings with Flynn, who was accused of playing footsie with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak prior to assuming his official role as national security adviser.
    If so, the notes strongly contradict Susan Rice’s CYA “memo to self” where the Obama national security adviser recounts the Jan. 5 meeting and stresses three times that President Obama and his team were handling the Flynn investigation “by the book.”
    Methinks the lady doth protest too much, especially now that we have Strzok’s contemporaneous notes to contradict her memo, which suspiciously was written in the final minutes of the Obama administration as Donald Trump was being sworn in at the Capitol.

    From what we can tell, Strzok (unlike Rice) was not writing his memo to protect anyone.
    He seems to have merely jotted down some notes about what various participants in the meeting said, including President Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, Rice, Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates and Strzok’s boss — FBI Director James Comey.

    But to see the importance of these notes, we need to transcribe them from the cryptic handwritten notes.
    Words and phrases that are outright guesses are reproduced in brackets.
    Speakers are noted at the beginning of each line. “NSA” stands for Rice. “D” stands for Comey. “DAG” stands for Yates. “VP” stands for Biden. “P” stands for Obama.
    “Cuts” is said to refer to summaries of phone calls monitored under a FISA warrant to collect foreign intelligence.
    ANOTHER fantastic post. Thanks, again.

  11. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    52,794
    Thanks
    13,341
    Thanked 22,579 Times in 15,814 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,951 Times in 1,862 Posts

    Default

    the Washington Post reports that “Strzok’s lawyer told The Fact Checker that Strzok did not attend the meeting,” and then suggests that probably means “the notes may recount what someone else — perhaps Comey — told him about the meeting.” Yes, maybe so, but there is good reason not to skate over the possibility that, as Pentchoukov puts it, Strzok “listened in” on the conversation.

    This is indeed heady stuff, as it is beyond reason to think that Strzok was an invited participant. The last thing anyone at that meeting would want is an independent account of what was said as they planned how to entrap one of the incoming president’s closest aides.
    Yet that does not eliminate the chance that Strzok benefited from some kind of surveillance technique to eavesdrop on the conversation, either with the knowledge of one person in the room or possibly with none. Of course it is scary to think that the FBI was wiretapping the White House, but they did it to Trump Tower, so who knows?

    It is the nature of the notes themselves that lends credence to this speculation. If they were written after the fact to memorialize a conversation Strzok had with Comey or someone else, there is no way to account for the brevity and choppiness of the account. Rather than just put “Logan Act” next to VP, an after-the-fact recitation would have been more likely to specify.

    And most suspiciously, there is no explanation for why Strzok would have cut off the end of Biden’s other contribution to the conversation. “I’ve been on the Intel Committee for 10 years and I never....,” the transcript goes. “Never what?” the reader wants to know.

    Ultimately, if Strzok is indeed the author, we need him to testify under oath exactly what is in the notes, and how they came to be written. Hopefully the FBI, the attorney general or someone else will declassify the extensive redactions above and below the nine lines that were released. One has to imagine that in those passages, Strzok revealed his source for the material quoted, as well as confirming the date of the meeting, and possibly the reason for the meeting. He has quite a tale to tell — one that could change history.

    If there were even one Republican senator in charge of a committee who had the curiosity of a 3-year-old, it is likely we could actually get to the bottom of the shenanigans that nearly toppled a president and finally pin the “tale” on the donkey — the Democratic donkey that is.
    https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ar...te_143628.html

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to anatta For This Post:

    Stretch (07-06-2020)

  13. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Location
    Valparaiso, Indiana USA
    Posts
    12,308
    Thanks
    12,429
    Thanked 3,406 Times in 2,917 Posts
    Groans
    5,261
    Groaned 325 Times in 306 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anatta View Post
    confirmation that Biden lied when he said he had nothing to do with the criminal prosecution of Flynn.

    The Logan Act is a more than 200-year-old statute that forbids ordinary Americans from negotiating with foreign governments that have a dispute with the United States. No one has ever been convicted under the law, and Flynn was not an ordinary American, but rather the incoming national security adviser; nonetheless it was a central plank in the plan to give Flynn enough rope to hang himself.
    The fact that quotes appear only around the words Logan Act suggest that this was a direct quote from Biden.

    In addition, the order by Obama presumably to Comey to “have the right people on it” suggests that there was a political element to the investigation and that the president wanted loyalists to handle it.
    What other explanation is there?

    we have a contemporaneous account of the FBI director assuring the president that Flynn’s conversations with Kislyak were “legit.”
    In that case, why did Strzok reveal in an instant message on Jan. 4, 2017, the day before this historic meeting, that the FBI agent in charge should NOT close the case against Flynn even though it should have already been closed because no evidence had accrued against him?


    If Comey thought the general’s conversations with Kislyak were “legit,” then why did Strzok tell another FBI contact that the “7th floor [was] involved” in the decision to keep the Flynn case alive. told his girlfriend Lisa Page, “Our utter incompetence actually helps us.”
    Thanks for this info.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Cancel 2020.2 For This Post:

    anatta (07-06-2020)

  15. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Vinland
    Posts
    39,851
    Thanks
    41,529
    Thanked 10,833 Times in 8,248 Posts
    Groans
    11,150
    Groaned 5,899 Times in 5,299 Posts
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Circle Jerk or reach around?
    It is the responsibility of every American citizen to own a modern military rifle.

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Rune For This Post:

    Charoite (07-06-2020)

  17. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    land-locked in Ocala,FL
    Posts
    27,321
    Thanks
    30,862
    Thanked 16,758 Times in 11,557 Posts
    Groans
    1,063
    Groaned 889 Times in 847 Posts

    Default

    This is great stuff. Chaos. Good news. Will the media be forced to "come around" now?
    Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
    empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
    pain in abortion.

    Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
    which has begun. To abort life is to end it.



  18. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    6,180
    Thanks
    2,837
    Thanked 4,318 Times in 2,772 Posts
    Groans
    65
    Groaned 215 Times in 209 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anatta View Post
    it is scary to think that the FBI was wiretapping the White House, but they did it to Trump Tower, so who knows?
    When did the FBI wiretap Trump Tower?

    I found this:

    The FBI has said it did wiretap Trump Tower … From 2011 to 2013, two years before Trump announced his presidential campaign, the bureau surveiled a Russian crime organization operating on the tower's 63rd floor.

    The FBI had a court-approved warrant to monitor Russian criminals running what prosecutors described as an "international money-laundering, sports gambling and extortion ring”.

    Is that it?
    Last edited by Tranquillus in Exile; 07-06-2020 at 11:46 AM.

  19. The Following User Says Thank You to Tranquillus in Exile For This Post:

    Charoite (07-06-2020)

  20. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    30,578
    Thanks
    18,197
    Thanked 15,614 Times in 10,679 Posts
    Groans
    202
    Groaned 617 Times in 606 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anatta View Post
    NSA - D - DAG: Flynn cuts. Other [countries].

    D - DAG: Lean forward on [illegible, but possibly “ambass” as in ambassador. Others have speculated on “useless” or “unless,” which don’t fit the context, or “unclass” as in “unclassified” or even a name beginning with m. We just don’t know.]

    VP: “Logan Act”

    P: These are unusual times

    VP: I’ve been on the Intel Committee for 10 years and I never

    P: Make sure you look at thing[s] + have the right people on it

    P: Is there anything I shouldn’t be telling transition team?

    D: Flynn —> Kislyak calls but appear legit.


    CRIMINAL PROSECUTION, THAT STARTED IN THE OBAMA WHITE HOUSE.


    NOW, WATCH THE JPP LEFT JUMP UP AND DEFEND THESE CRIMES, AND ABUSES OF POWER.
    TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..


    De Oppresso Liber

Similar Threads

  1. What is Obamagate
    By tsuke in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 05-27-2020, 05:28 AM
  2. Hildebeast implicated in Obamagate?
    By Legion in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 196
    Last Post: 05-16-2020, 06:03 AM
  3. Obamagate in the news
    By Legion in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-14-2020, 05:29 PM
  4. NUNES Memo Correct Schiff, Memo was a LIE
    By FastLane in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-17-2019, 04:53 AM
  5. Rosetta: Anxious wait for comet chaser wake up
    By cancel2 2022 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-10-2013, 08:35 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •