Bernie visits Mt Rushmore

[anatta]

I tried to debate. You moved the goalposts.

Like I said - you & Fox went for the intellectually dishonest position that being anti-Mt. Rushmore is somehow a mainstream Dem position. It's shameful. Then, when I call you on it - you say I "can't debate."

I try to debate you all the time. You're reduced to a handful of oft-repeated, predictable generalizations. It's very sad.

I didn't it's Dem MS - but it IS in MS publications.
And not denouncing -standing up for America and the founders IS acquiescence.

The mob wont stop because you are silent -the mob drives Dems agenda in terms of PC thought.

I actively oppose all of it -do you?? no

[jacksonsprat22]

How many mainstream politicians or activists have said Mount Rushmore is racist? I don't care about an opinion piece by someone with little to no influence.

I do think eventually, when Whites are a minority, Mount Rushmore will be destroyed. But there is no push for that right now and when it does happens, it won't be a partisan issue.

US Supreme Court believes the Lakota Sioux own the land of Mount Rushmore.

[BartenderElite]

I didn't it's Dem MS - but it IS in MS publications.
And not denouncing -standing up for America and the founders IS acquiescence.

The mob wont stop because you are silent -the mob drives Dems agenda in terms of PC thought.

I actively oppose all of it -do you?? no

What ridiculous shaming. "If you haven't spoken up about this, you are actively supporting that."

Your arguing on this thread is absolutely shameful. You start by implying mainstream Dem thought is that Mt. Rushmore is unpatriotic and should be removed, based on a few opinion pieces (and spare me the lame face-saving 'but they're in MS publications!') Then, when called on it, you expand it to all kinds of pet annoyances you have, and say that if we haven't shouted from the mountaintops on those, it somehow implies that we're anti-Mt. Rushmore.

As I said at the start - very intellectually dishonest. You're incapable of winning a straight-up debate.

[anatta]

How many mainstream politicians or activists have said Mount Rushmore is racist? I don't care about an opinion piece by someone with little to no influence.

I do think eventually, when Whites are a minority, Mount Rushmore will be destroyed. But there is no push for that right now and when it does happens, it won't be a partisan issue.

1 year ago, did you think George Washington would be set on fire and torn down? US Grant?

this is a movement ( I call it America's Cultural Revolution" -we are at the getting rid of the 4 Olds phase)
The only way to stop it is to ACTIVELY OPPOSE it..

Oh look at this? Mt Rushmore is "white supremacy

DNC deletes tweet accusing Trump of ‘glorifying white supremacy’ with Mt. Rushmore visit

https://nypost.com/2020/06/30/dnc-de...ite-supremacy/

[anatta]

US Supreme Court believes the Lakota Sioux own the land of Mount Rushmore.

should it be removed?

[StoneByStone]

US Supreme Court believes the Lakota Sioux own the land of Mount Rushmore.

Regardless of who owns it, the South Dakota government won't let anyone destroy it. It brings in lots of tourists and money.

Eventually that'll change, but this is the situation right now.

[jacksonsprat22]

should it be removed?

Trump should be removed, yes.

Oglala Sioux Tribe Votes to Ban President Trump, South Dakota Gov. from Mount Rushmore

PINE RIDGE INDIAN RESERVATION — The Oglala Sioux Tribe’s tribal council has voted to ban President Donald Trump and South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem from Mount Rushmore.

Trump and Noem are due to arrive tonight at Mount Rushmore in western South Dakota for a pre-July 4th celebration. The celebration will include a fireworks display where 7,500 are expected to attend.

Additional reasons for the ban by the tribal council include Mount Rushmore is located in the Black Hills, which is in unceded treaty territory and the total lack of government-to-government consultation

https://nativenewsonline.net/current...ount-rushmore/

[jacksonsprat22]

Regardless of who owns it, the South Dakota government won't let anyone destroy it. It brings in lots of tourists and money.

Eventually that'll change, but this is the situation right now.

Supreme Court said Lakota own it. They're the law of the US Land.

[anatta]

What ridiculous shaming. "If you haven't spoken up about this, you are actively supporting that."

Your arguing on this thread is absolutely shameful. You start by implying mainstream Dem thought is that Mt. Rushmore is unpatriotic and should be removed, based on a few opinion pieces (and spare me the lame face-saving 'but they're in MS publications!') Then, when called on it, you expand it to all kinds of pet annoyances you have, and say that if we haven't shouted from the mountaintops on those, it somehow implies that we're anti-Mt. Rushmore.

As I said at the start - very intellectually dishonest. You're incapable of winning a straight-up debate.

have you ever heard. "one thing leads to another?"
you are incapable of a logic train. I think you ARE capable but you dont want to go there -too uncomfortable for Dems .
When did you decry throwing Molotovs at police? tearing down George Washington? US Grant? Burning down St. Johns?

And WHAT WAS THE REASON GIVEN - because they are racist. what the reasoning to go after Mt Rushmore?
Racist white people stole their land = America is a racist construct

[anatta]

Supreme Court said Lakota own it. They're the law of the US Land.

you dodge. the question was "should it be torn down" else why do you post this?

[BartenderElite]

have you ever heard. "one thing leads to another?"
you are incapable of a logic train. I think you ARE capable but you dont want to go there -too uncomfortable for Dems .
When did you decry throwing Molotovs at police? tearing down George Washington? US Grant? Burning down St. Johns?

And WHAT WAS THE REASON GIVEN - because they are racist. what the reasoning to go after Mt Rushmore?
Racist white people stole their land = America is a racist construct

Slippery slope is BS.

Because I could care less about Robert E. Lee doesn't have ZILCH to do w/ how I feel about Mt. Rushmore.

Conflating and intellectual dishonesty. Wanna try for anything else?

[AProudLefty]

have you ever heard. "one thing leads to another?"
you are incapable of a logic train. I think you ARE capable but you dont want to go there -too uncomfortable for Dems .
When did you decry throwing Molotovs at police? tearing down George Washington? US Grant? Burning down St. Johns?

And WHAT WAS THE REASON GIVEN - because they are racist. what the reasoning to go after Mt Rushmore?
Racist white people stole their land = America is a racist construct

It was the fucking Native Americans who said that!

[anatta]

"nothing to see here" Dems turn their heads

[StoneByStone]

1 year ago, did you think George Washington would be set on fire and torn down? US Grant?

Yes, but those were civilian protesters, not elected officials.

DNC deletes tweet accusing Trump of ‘glorifying white supremacy’ with Mt. Rushmore visit

https://nypost.com/2020/06/30/dnc-de...ite-supremacy/

This doesn't mean all or even half the Democrats agree.

Like I said, I think that when Whites are a minority, this is going to be the mainstream view. My only issue here is trying to turn it into a partisan issue and acting like the current Left already believes this.
This is why so-called Conservatives have been so ineffective at maintaining American culture. They blame Liberalism when they should be blaming Multiracialism.

[jacksonsprat22]

you dodge. the question was "should it be torn down" else why do you post this?

The land belongs to the Lakota. Upheld by the US Supreme Court in 1980. Should I explain those words to you, dimwit?