Black civil rights attorney announces he's voting for President Trump

[cancel2 2022]

FB_IMG_1594254915111.jpg

[Taichiliberal]

FB_IMG_1594254915111.jpg

So this little ditty is what, an attempt to justify or rationalize the immoral injustice and ramifications of American slavery? This "well, others did it too" excuse would gets kids rimshots by teachers when they were caught doing something wrong. Just WTF is Sowell attempting here....to minimalize the atrocities of slavery and a racist mindset that was LEGAL right up to the 1960's? It's this type of absurdist blathering by token "nee-groes" to justify their place at the table is one of the reasons why most black folk just ignore them, while folk like you embrace them. Sowell is just a useful pseudo-intellectual clown...has been for years. If James Baldwin were alive, he'd make short work of Sowell's screeds. But others are hip to his game https://otoolefan.wordpress.com/2010...diot-emeritus/

And to date, neither YOU or your like minded cohorts can logically or factually deny my examples: https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...65#post3745965

Carry on.

[cancel2 2022]

So this little ditty is what, an attempt to justify or rationalize the immoral injustice and ramifications of American slavery? This "well, others did it too" excuse would gets kids rimshots by teachers when they were caught doing something wrong. Just WTF is Sowell attempting here....to minimalize the atrocities of slavery and a racist mindset that was LEGAL right up to the 1960's? It's this type of absurdist blathering by token "nee-groes" to justify their place at the table is one of the reasons why most black folk just ignore them, while folk like you embrace them. Sowell is just a useful pseudo-intellectual clown...has been for years. If James Baldwin were alive, he'd make short work of Sowell's screeds. But others are hip to his game https://otoolefan.wordpress.com/2010...diot-emeritus/

And to date, neither YOU or your like minded cohorts can logically or factually deny my examples: https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...65#post3745965

Carry on.

Brilliant, so anybody that you disagree with is an Uncle Tom, is that it? I am also sufficiently old to remember James Baldwin as well. You'd do well to read this before you dismiss Thomas Sowell out of hand in your usual flippant fashion.

https://sydneytrads.com/2017/08/21/richard-cocks-9/

[Guno צְבִי]

FB_IMG_1594254915111.jpg

[cancel2 2022]

LMAO!. Seriously Tai, move on. Accept your ass kicking with your own bullshit and move on. Your false bravado and faux intelligence is amusing. And that is it.

The guy is intelligent but he hails from the school of windbaggery and using ten words when two would do! He's like an American version of the Welsh Windbag.

[cancel2 2022]

Brilliant, so anybody that you disagree with is an Uncle Tom, is that it? I am also sufficiently old to remember James Baldwin as well. You'd do well to read this before you dismiss Thomas Sowell out of hand in your usual flippant fashion.

https://sydneytrads.com/2017/08/21/richard-cocks-9/

[TexanManWithPlans]

Lol. And if I find a trailer park redneck who supports Biden and hates Trump, will all Trumpers "see the light" and stop supporting Trump?

What patronizing bullshit, OP.

[Sailor]

The guy is intelligent but he hails from the school of windbaggery and using ten words when two would do! He's like an American version of the Welsh Windbag.

The wannabe Welsh windbag. AKA sheep fucker.

[Trumpet]

The wannabe Welsh windbag. AKA sheep fucker.

Popeye=sheep fucker

[Earl]

Leo is a lawyer and he taught school.

He is a liberal who has seen the duplicity of the Democrat "plantation" horse mierda.

Good for Leo.

[cancel2 2022]

The wannabe Welsh windbag. AKA sheep fucker.

Thaichi lives in New York so probably no sheep fucking but otherwise...

[Taichiliberal]

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
So this little ditty is what, an attempt to justify or rationalize the immoral injustice and ramifications of American slavery? This "well, others did it too" excuse would gets kids rimshots by teachers when they were caught doing something wrong. Just WTF is Sowell attempting here....to minimalize the atrocities of slavery and a racist mindset that was LEGAL right up to the 1960's? It's this type of absurdist blathering by token "nee-groes" to justify their place at the table is one of the reasons why most black folk just ignore them, while folk like you embrace them. Sowell is just a useful pseudo-intellectual clown...has been for years. If James Baldwin were alive, he'd make short work of Sowell's screeds. But others are hip to his game https://otoolefan.wordpress.com/2010...diot-emeritus/

And to date, neither YOU or your like minded cohorts can logically or factually deny my examples: https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...65#post3745965

Carry on.

Brilliant, so anybody that you disagree with is an Uncle Tom, is that it? I am also sufficiently old to remember James Baldwin as well. You'd do well to read this before you dismiss Thomas Sowell out of hand in your usual flippant fashion.

https://sydneytrads.com/2017/08/21/richard-cocks-9/

Your first sentence is typical right wing BS.....when someone can accurately point out the flaws of one of your heroes, they are the bad guys. Sorry toodles, but the nonsense only sells to your like minded brethren, NOT the rational, objective person who can comprehend what they read and do a comparative context against history....as the person in my link did. In short, you're lying about what I wrote.

As to your "example"....more skewed BS from Sowell that sits well with his conservative masters at the Hoover Institute. I notice you don't DARE address the points put forth in my link (intellectual cowardice or willful ignorance on your part). But let's put an end to another Sowell saga: First, the author of your link includes Sowell in a one sentence denunciation of James Baldwin by making a claim of a Baldwin assessment WITHOUT ANY CONTEXT FROM THE BALDWIN WRITINGS ITSELF.

But to buy into Sowell's pseudo-intellectual blathering, you have to IGNORE THE FACTS that Jim Crow didn't officially end until the 1960's, that all during his lifetime you have court cases across the USA dealing with housing and hiring discrimination happen on a periodic bases. That's just for starters.

But while you're STILL in denial of the historic accuracy of my previous post, here's another pointer regarding Sowell's accuracy:


https://www.standard.net/opinion/let...6d9f11e96.html

[Taichiliberal]

https://www.psypost.org/2019/03/blac...dy-finds-53243

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019...elusional.html

deal with it.

[Taichiliberal]

Thaichi lives in New York so probably no sheep fucking but otherwise...

Tweedle Dumb and Tweedle Dumber having a circle jerk when faced with a debate they can't win on content and merit.

[cancel2 2022]

Your first sentence is typical right wing BS.....when someone can accurately point out the flaws of one of your heroes, they are the bad guys. Sorry toodles, but the nonsense only sells to your like minded brethren, NOT the rational, objective person who can comprehend what they read and do a comparative context against history....as the person in my link did. In short, you're lying about what I wrote.

As to your "example"....more skewed BS from Sowell that sits well with his conservative masters at the Hoover Institute. I notice you don't DARE address the points put forth in my link (intellectual cowardice or willful ignorance on your part). But let's put an end to another Sowell saga: First, the author of your link includes Sowell in a one sentence denunciation of James Baldwin by making a claim of a Baldwin assessment WITHOUT ANY CONTEXT FROM THE BALDWIN WRITINGS ITSELF.

But to buy into Sowell's pseudo-intellectual blathering, you have to IGNORE THE FACTS that Jim Crow didn't officially end until the 1960's, that all during his lifetime you have court cases across the USA dealing with housing and hiring discrimination happen on a periodic bases. That's just for starters.

But while you're STILL in denial of the historic accuracy of my previous post, here's another pointer regarding Sowell's accuracy:


https://www.standard.net/opinion/let...6d9f11e96.html

Here is Thomas Sowell talking about the Ponzi scheme otherwise known as Social Security. He is merely saying that it is not a hypothecated scheme which is 100% true. Any economist worth their salt would tell you the same!

https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2011/06...cial-security/