Science

[jacksonsprat22]

Evidence of that?

Asking for evidence fallacy.

[AProudLefty]

Asking for evidence fallacy.

[Into the Night]

The only source in a philosophical argument is yourself.

sources of philosophical arguments: Kant, Aristotle, Descartes, Socrates, Plato, Rousseau, Jesus, Engles.....

We agree. All of these sources of their philosophies were solely themselves. You seem to be trying to show a disagreement using a semantics fallacy.

There is no such thing as 'philosophy of history', 'philosophy of science', etc. There is just philosophy, or there is not.
Voltaire, La philosophie de l'histoire, Changuion, 1765.

False authority fallacy. Philosophy is not a book.

History is past events. There is no philosophy about it.
Voltaire, La philosophie de l'histoire, Changuion, 1765.

False authority fallacy.

Science is a set of falsifiable theories. There is no philosophy about it.

Epistemologists study the nature of knowledge, epistemic justification, the rationality of belief, and various related issues. Epistemology is considered one of the four main branches of philosophy,

Science is just a set of falsifiable theories. It is not knowledge. It doesn't have to be justified. It doesn't have a 'belief'. It has no 'issues'. It is just a set of falsifiable theories.

along with ethics,

Not science.

logic,

Logic is not philosophy. It is a closed functional system like mathematics.

and metaphysics.

Not science.

Philosophy of science is a branch of philosophy concerned with the foundations, methods, and implications of science.

Science is not a 'foundation'. It is not a 'method' or 'procedure'. There is no 'philosophy of science'. The philosophical arguments discussing the implication of science is just philosophy.

The central questions of this study concern what qualifies as science,

Science is just a set of falsifiable theories. If a theory is falsifiable, it is a theory of science until it is falsified. it is never proven True. No theory of any kind, scientific or otherwise, is ever proven True.

the reliability of scientific theories,

There is no 'reliability' of any theory. The theory simply exists.

and the ultimate purpose of science.

It has no specific purpose. Reversal fallacy.

This discipline overlaps with metaphysics, ontology, and epistemology,

Science is not philosophy.

Religion is some initial circular argument with arguments extending from that. There is no philosophy about it.

Philosophy of Religion is rational thought about religious issues and concerns without a presumption of the existence of a deity or reliance on acts of faith.

All arguments free of fallacies are rational. All religions are based on some initial circular argument, with arguments extending from that. The other name for the circular argument is 'faith'. It is not, in and of itself, a fallacy. Attempting to prove a circular argument, however, IS a fallacy.

Philosophers examine the nature of religion and religious beliefs.

The nature of all religions is that they based on a an initial circular argument, with arguments extending from that.

There is just philosophy"
Ontology, teleology, cosmology, phenomenology, rationalism, historicism, ethics, aesthetics

Some of these are philosophy, others are not.

"Totally uneducated annoying loser posing as a philosopher fallacy."

Inversion fallacy.

[Into the Night]

I know....the trend is towards classes like "Establishing Safe Zones" and "The Physics of Safe Statue Tipping"........

Obviously, some do better than others in those classes.
https://au.news.yahoo.com/man-crushe...050219545.html

[Into the Night]

False accusation fallacy.

Mockery. Denial of logic.

[Into the Night]

Whatever you're talking about...you're profoundly uninformed.

Mantras 12...5...

[jacksonsprat22]

Mantras 12...5...

bye troll

[Into the Night]

Evidence of that?

You.

[Into the Night]

Asking for evidence fallacy.

Mockery. Denial of logic.

[Into the Night]

bye troll

Mantras 1...7...

[AProudLefty]

You.

I teach at every college? Wow I didn't know I get around.

[AProudLefty]

Mockery. Denial of logic.

False accusation fallacy.

[AProudLefty]

bye troll

I think he's actually on the level and it's scary.

[jacksonsprat22]

I think he's actually on the level and it's scary.

He never once made an argument. And insists others must make an argument. The Trump era: Say stuff and pretend it's self evidently true.

[AProudLefty]

He never once made an argument. And insists others must make an argument. The Trump era: Say stuff and pretend it's self evidently true.

Yeah. He kept spouting fallacies instead of really discussing.