Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 21 of 21

Thread: No One Wants To Talk About It Because It Was A United Nations War

  1. #16 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Olympia, Wa
    Posts
    70,439
    Thanks
    3,124
    Thanked 15,027 Times in 12,557 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 1,401 Times in 1,345 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steven VanderMolen View Post
    Nope, things are going very well on USMB. I'm going to make sure I never get a ban on there again.
    Yes yes.....someday we must talk about these mystical powers you say you have developed.

    AND LOOK HOW LATE YOU ARE UP!

    Welcome Back!
    This illegal illegitimate regime that runs America is at fault...not me.... they do not represent me and I have long objected to their crimes against humanity.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Hawkeye10 For This Post:

    Cancel 2020.2 (10-08-2020)

  3. #17 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    p.s. Then-Senator Biden advocated the 2001 war in Afghanistan: "Whatever it takes, we should do it."

    “We” to a Democrat means the United Nations should do it while Americans do the fighting.
    China Joe Biden had no trouble going to war for the United Nations, but he will turn his back on Taiwan’s independence.

    NOTE: Silicon Valley is today’s version of CBS’ Walter Cronkite declaring the war in Vietnam was lost when the U.S. military never lost a battle:


    Twitter is not the only Silicon Valley company to bend the knee to China. Apple allows Chinese officials to physically monitor its facilities and data centers in the country, and Microsoft aggressively censors LinkedIn to remove references to topics that the Communist Party finds sensitive.


    Twitter Cedes Taiwan to China
    Santi Ruiz
    September 17, 2021 3:02 pm

    https://freebeacon.com/national-secu...iwan-to-china/
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  4. #18 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    28,475
    Thanks
    3,851
    Thanked 11,990 Times in 8,257 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 2,672 Times in 2,478 Posts

    Default

    Technically speaking, WWII was a United Nations war. The allies during WWII were called the United Nations, and the group we now call the United Nations was a continuation of the alliance after the war.

  5. #19 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Walt View Post
    Technically speaking, WWII was a United Nations war.
    To Walt: No it was not. If you believe that crap you might just as well call WWII a Parasite War which is the only kind of war the U.N. fights. The fact is that the U.S. fought a war of self-defense —— and retaliation —— after Japan bombed Pearl Harbor. In short: No American would fight for the U.N.’s global government then or now.

    Quote Originally Posted by Walt View Post
    The allies during WWII were called the United Nations, and the group we now call the United Nations was a continuation of the alliance after the war.
    To Walt: Get it right before you clutter up my threads with touchy-feely garbage:


    The U.N. succeeded Wilson’s League of Nations. Democrat global villagers were determined not to be denied success the second time around. Still promoting the same old Wilsonian crapola they moved their desks over to the United Nations in 1945. Same jockey —— different horse.

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...50#post2816850
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  6. #20 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    28,475
    Thanks
    3,851
    Thanked 11,990 Times in 8,257 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 2,672 Times in 2,478 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    No it was not. If you believe that crap you might just as well call WWII a Parasite War which is the only kind of war the U.N. fights. The fact is that the U.S. fought a war of self-defense —— and retaliation —— after Japan bombed Pearl Harbor. In short: No American would fight for the U.N.’s global government then or now.
    The USA and Britain formed a multi-power alliance called the United Nations to fight WWII. They agreed to extend it to after WWII, and wrote up a charter for it towards the end of WWII. At first, only allied nations during WWII were allowed to join, so countries like Spain and Sweden were not members of the UN.

    Millions of Americans have fought for multi-national alliances, including the UN. During the Battle of the Bulge, command for several large units was transferred to the British. Mixing command hierarchies was becoming more common.

  7. #21 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Walt View Post
    Millions of Americans have fought for multi-national alliances, including the UN.
    To Walt: Asshole! Americans fight for their country. When they are lied to, and tricked into fighting for the U.N. they are fighting against their own country.

    For your edification, the League of Nations’ and the U.N.’s governing political philosophy are identical:


    The Covenant of the League of Nations
    (Including Amendments adopted to December, 1924)


    https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/leagcov.asp

    XXXXX

    United Nations Charter (full text)

    https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter/full-text


    Both International ORGANIZATIONS give governing authority to unelected ruling classes and their bureaucrats.


    NOTE: The New World Order crowd could not get the League of Nations ratified. They succeeded in 1945 with another name. Three years later International parasites got:


    The ugliest document ever written, the U.N.’s 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, is the most devious compendium of institutional morality ever devised. That is why Obama preached positive Rights for the United Nations as opposed to “negative” Rights in our Bill of Rights. His positive Rights is nothing more than justifying tax dollars being collected by government Good Samaritans, while not one negative Right in the Bill of Rights forces someone else to pay —— as the U.’N.’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights aimed for.

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...66#post4388266

    If there is any truth to your crap the American people would insist on repealing the Connally Reservation:


    Before the U.S. Senate became a full-blown nest of traitors Senator Tom Connally (D-Texas) insisted on putting these six words in the U.N. Charter:

    "AS DETERMINED BY THE UNITED STATES."

    Those six words are known as the "Connally Reservation" and are the only words that prevents the U.N.’s World Court from interfering in America’s internal affairs on the pretext that tariffs, immigration laws, school curriculums, etc., affect U.S. relations with other countries and are therefore "foreign" and not "domestic."

    The battle over repealing the Connally Reservation from the U.N. Charter has been ongoing since 1946 —— most of it below the public’s radar screen. Connally’s Amendment protected Americans from more than an average person like me could ever cover; not the least of those protections was shielding our Second Amendment from U.N. gun grabbers.


    Senator vows to kill U.N. arms treaty
    Ratification 'will not happen so long as I am breathing in the U.S. Senate'
    Published: 04/13/2013 at 9:14 PM
    TAYLOR ROSE

    http://www.wnd.com/2013/04/senator-v...n-arms-treaty/


    Should you research it I think you will be surprised, and maybe disappointed, in some of the people who supported repealing the Connally Reservation.

    Unfortunately, the Connally Reservation does not protect against U.N. treaties so long as the traitor’s work is built upon the U.N.’s foundation. I doubt if more than a small handful of Americans saw U.N. treaties coming their way; and certainly did not see the attacks on sovereignty built into today’s U.N. treaties.

    The worst of it is that signed, but unratified, United Nations treaties have a shelf life longer than the half-life of radiation from a detonated nuclear bomb. A U.N. treaty’s shelf life is so long I once suggested that American presidents should be required to at least make an effort to ratify treaties signed in their administration. Congress should pass a law stating that whenever a president fails to get one of his treaties ratified before leaving office, or two years after leaving, that treaty is automatically rejected for all time.

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...73#post2757973

    Incidentally, a traitor was the U.N.’s first Secretary General:

    My point is that the things Patton was saying would have derailed the New World Order’s plans. Assassinating Patton to keep their plan on track makes more sense to me than did killing him simply because he might embarrass people in FDR’s inner circle like Alger Hiss. At the very least, the United Nations might never have gotten off the ground if Hiss, who was spying for Stalin, was tarred by Patton. Hiss became the Secretary General presiding over the U.N. Charter Conference.

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...06#post4364906
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

Similar Threads

  1. Let’s Not Hear It For The United Nations
    By Flanders in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-18-2020, 07:35 AM
  2. First Protect Children From The United Nations
    By Flanders in forum Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-12-2019, 08:39 AM
  3. Stop The Leaks To The United Nations
    By Flanders in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-29-2019, 06:47 AM
  4. United States humiliated at the United Nations
    By moon in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 253
    Last Post: 06-25-2018, 01:27 AM
  5. United Nations sees wisdom
    By Canceled.LTroll.27 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 04-08-2010, 09:53 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •