Page 9 of 10 FirstFirst ... 5678910 LastLast
Results 121 to 135 of 143

Thread: Supreme Court slaps down Trump again on DACA

  1. #121 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    internet
    Posts
    39,189
    Thanks
    7,082
    Thanked 17,235 Times in 10,345 Posts
    Groans
    1,025
    Groaned 1,490 Times in 1,337 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOwlWoman View Post
    A just decision. Unsurprisingly, many (R)s acted with outrage.
    why is it just? because you simply agree with the policy? will you support trumps right to enact EO's now with zero justification and have the next president not be able to rescind them without justification? that's where we are heading


    ---

    Quote Originally Posted by Mott the Hoople View Post
    Grind is basically right
    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Grind’s got you beat by miles. He is very intelligent.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to BRUTALITOPS For This Post:

    anatta (06-19-2020)

  3. #122 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    internet
    Posts
    39,189
    Thanks
    7,082
    Thanked 17,235 Times in 10,345 Posts
    Groans
    1,025
    Groaned 1,490 Times in 1,337 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    I support kids that were brought up in America from not being deported to a place they know nothing about. (seems like a no-brainer)
    that's not what they ruled on, you idiot. the SJC isn't there to enact policy. are you stupid?


    ---

    Quote Originally Posted by Mott the Hoople View Post
    Grind is basically right
    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Grind’s got you beat by miles. He is very intelligent.

  4. #123 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    47,509
    Thanks
    17,005
    Thanked 13,151 Times in 10,077 Posts
    Groans
    452
    Groaned 2,450 Times in 2,265 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cohort View Post
    that's not what they ruled on, you idiot. the SJC isn't there to enact policy. are you stupid?
    You'll have to take that up with the Supreme Court.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Jack For This Post:

    Micawber (06-18-2020)

  6. #124 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bourbon View Post
    Trump has to be getting tired of getting Bitch Slapped but now ...
    He sues constantly and loses nearly always. So much for conservative reticence to resort to the judicial branch. Hypocrites will be hypocritical. It's what they do.

  7. The Following User Groans At Micawber For This Awful Post:

    Earl (06-18-2020)

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Micawber For This Post:

    ThatOwlWoman (06-18-2020)

  9. #125 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    internet
    Posts
    39,189
    Thanks
    7,082
    Thanked 17,235 Times in 10,345 Posts
    Groans
    1,025
    Groaned 1,490 Times in 1,337 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    You'll have to take that up with the Supreme Court.
    they didn't rule on the policy, retard.


    ---

    Quote Originally Posted by Mott the Hoople View Post
    Grind is basically right
    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Grind’s got you beat by miles. He is very intelligent.

  10. #126 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    134,833
    Thanks
    13,240
    Thanked 40,780 Times in 32,146 Posts
    Groans
    3,660
    Groaned 2,865 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LV426 View Post
    And they can sort it out in court, if they wish. But given their record so far, that seems like a bad option.
    actually he's won far more than he's lost....
    Isaiah 6:5
    “Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to PostmodernProphet For This Post:

    Earl (06-18-2020)

  12. #127 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,966
    Thanks
    12,109
    Thanked 14,172 Times in 10,390 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by floridafan View Post
    This is your court, these are your justices. Trump himself chose the two who produced a conservative majority. You asked for them and now you have them!!
    According to the Borowitz Report, Trump is planning to override the Supreme Court by forming his own Supremer Court. lol

  13. #128 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    47,509
    Thanks
    17,005
    Thanked 13,151 Times in 10,077 Posts
    Groans
    452
    Groaned 2,450 Times in 2,265 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cohort View Post
    they didn't rule on the policy, retard.
    This is Jack's position: "I support kids that were brought up in America from not being deported to a place they know nothing about. (seems like a no-brainer)"
    This is Grind's response: "that's not what they ruled on, you idiot. the SJC isn't there to enact policy. are you stupid?"

    So, they didn't rule on Jack's Position?

    Jack responds to Grind: "You'll have to take that up with the Supreme Court."
    Grind again responds in desperation: "they didn't rule on the policy, retard."

    ... and your point is ... what?

  14. #129 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    52,291
    Thanks
    77,752
    Thanked 23,568 Times in 17,849 Posts
    Groans
    38,677
    Groaned 3,238 Times in 3,042 Posts
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by floridafan View Post
    Can you give us a link to where we can find that assumption of yours?
    “The U.S. Constitution grants Congress the exclusive right to legislate in the area of immigration. Most of the relevant laws, including the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), are found in Title 8 of the United States Code. State governments are prohibited from enacting immigration laws.”
    hg.org

    Have you ever even read the Constitution?

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Earl For This Post:

    anatta (06-19-2020)

  16. #130 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    52,291
    Thanks
    77,752
    Thanked 23,568 Times in 17,849 Posts
    Groans
    38,677
    Groaned 3,238 Times in 3,042 Posts
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    This is Jack's position: "I support kids that were brought up in America from not being deported to a place they know nothing about. (seems like a no-brainer)"
    This is Grind's response: "that's not what they ruled on, you idiot. the SJC isn't there to enact policy. are you stupid?"

    So, they didn't rule on Jack's Position?

    Jack responds to Grind: "You'll have to take that up with the Supreme Court."
    Grind again responds in desperation: "they didn't rule on the policy, retard."

    ... and your point is ... what?
    Jacky, I thought that I explained that the S.C. did not rule on the legality of DACA.

    It ruled on the procedure to rescind the E.O. by Obama that included illegal children brought to this country, illegally, by their illegal parents.

    It must be filed with the Congressional Record, etc.

    This will all be done with the necessary changes and then the S.C. will rule whether the Obama E.O. changed the immigration law without Congress approving the change.

    It did and is therefore illegal to include illegal children under DACA.

    Try to retain this for more than a couple of hours, Jacky.

    Cohort is exactly right, they did not rule on the policy.

  17. #131 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    30,555
    Thanks
    18,195
    Thanked 15,614 Times in 10,679 Posts
    Groans
    202
    Groaned 617 Times in 606 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Concart View Post
    Trump loses again. Roberts writes the majority opinion. DACA continues. Sorry xenophobes.
    NOT DENIED ON ITS MERITS, BUT ON PROCEDURE....
    TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..


    De Oppresso Liber

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to Grokmaster For This Post:

    anatta (06-19-2020)

  19. #132 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Ravenhenge in the Northwoods
    Posts
    88,272
    Thanks
    145,679
    Thanked 82,496 Times in 52,724 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 4,657 Times in 4,376 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cohort View Post
    why is it just? because you simply agree with the policy? will you support trumps right to enact EO's now with zero justification and have the next president not be able to rescind them without justification? that's where we are heading
    DACA is what a just nation does. We do not punish children for the sins of their mothers and fathers. Do *you* support sending an English-speaking American kid back to Guatemala when he's 15, a place he last saw when he was 3? What about sending an American soldier, whose parents brought her here as an infant, back to a slum in Mexico?
    "Conservatism is the blind and fear-filled worship of dead radicals." -- Mark Twain

  20. #133 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Federal Way, WA
    Posts
    68,352
    Thanks
    18,375
    Thanked 18,674 Times in 14,047 Posts
    Groans
    628
    Groaned 1,136 Times in 1,080 Posts

  21. #134 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    47,509
    Thanks
    17,005
    Thanked 13,151 Times in 10,077 Posts
    Groans
    452
    Groaned 2,450 Times in 2,265 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Earl View Post
    Jacky, I thought that I explained that the S.C. did not rule on the legality of DACA.

    It ruled on the procedure to rescind the E.O. by Obama that included illegal children brought to this country, illegally, by their illegal parents.

    It must be filed with the Congressional Record, etc.

    This will all be done with the necessary changes and then the S.C. will rule whether the Obama E.O. changed the immigration law without Congress approving the change.

    It did and is therefore illegal to include illegal children under DACA.

    Try to retain this for more than a couple of hours, Jacky.

    Cohort is exactly right, they did not rule on the policy.
    And, uh, ... what has that got to do with me expressing MY Opinion on the Subject?

  22. #135 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    38,029
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 18,918 Times in 13,188 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 832 Times in 791 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Concart View Post
    It doesn't. It has to do with the bullshit you posted about separating dreamers from their parents.
    I posted nothing about separating "dreamers" from their parents. All I said, is their parents are criminals. If the parents are deported, then minor children are deported with them. If the children are adults, they can be separately deported for being here illegally. It's just too bad if they spent most of their life here in an illegal status because of their worthless, criminal parents. If you don't like that then get Congress to change the immigration laws.

Similar Threads

  1. Will Supreme Court order Trump to NOT enforce immigration laws.? - DACA case tmrw
    By Text Drivers are Killers in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-11-2019, 05:34 PM
  2. Supreme Court slaps down Trump's racist assault on DACA
    By reagansghost in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-03-2019, 06:44 PM
  3. Replies: 49
    Last Post: 06-01-2019, 12:31 PM
  4. Supreme Court rules for Trump
    By volsrock in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-26-2018, 08:39 AM
  5. court rules Trump cannot end DACA
    By tsuke in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 01-10-2018, 12:26 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •