Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Defense secretary Esper opposes Trump's Insurrection Act plans.

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    24,289
    Thanks
    4,254
    Thanked 4,194 Times in 3,330 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2,992 Times in 2,858 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Defense secretary Esper opposes Trump's Insurrection Act plans.

    Esper opposes using Insurrection Act to send military to states

    Mark Esper, the defense secretary, has said there is no grounds for invoking the Insurrection Act, which Trump has threatened to do.

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...08cadb6040059e
    Poor old Donald . He'll end up with just Netanyahu as a pal.
    " First they came for the journalists...
    We don't know what happened after that . "

    Maria Ressa.

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    16,730
    Thanks
    9,787
    Thanked 8,540 Times in 5,722 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 4,242 Times in 3,648 Posts

    Default

    Hello moon,

    Quote Originally Posted by moon View Post
    Defense secretary Esper opposes Trump's Insurrection Act plans.
    He is so fired for that.
    Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    2,195
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 601 Times in 430 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 227 Times in 203 Posts

    Default

    Pentagon chief breaks from Trump over use of active-duty military forces to quell unrest

    Defense Secretary Mark Esper said Wednesday that he does not support the use of active-duty military forces in quelling countrywide unrest — a statement that puts him at odds with President Trump, who has threatened to send troops into U.S. cities.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...-live-updates/

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to jacksonsprat22 For This Post:

    ThatOwlWoman (06-03-2020)

  5. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    84,068
    Thanks
    37,771
    Thanked 25,434 Times in 19,453 Posts
    Groans
    29,737
    Groaned 3,838 Times in 3,658 Posts
    Blog Entries
    39

    Default

    .
    Yes, Trump Can Use Military To Quell Spreading Riots — And He Should, If States, Cities Fail To Do The Job

    President Donald Trump says he may call out the military to quell riots if the states refuse to do their duty to protect their citizens. But can he even do that? His harshest critics say no, but they’re very wrong.

    The riots and looting that have taken place across the country are anything but “peaceful.” And while all of us agree peaceful demonstrations are acceptable, even if we don’t agree with them, the recent orgy of violence has been driven by far-left anarchists and others bent on taking down a democratically elected government.

    Even so, many in the Democratic Party, including former President Barack Obama and current House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, are not exactly covering themselves in glory when they say they “understand” why the violence is happening but can’t quite bring themselves to condemn it.

    “Once the violence began, any effort to ‘understand’ it should have stopped, since that understanding is inevitably exculpatory,” writes Heather Mac Donald in City Journal. “The looters are not grieving over the stomach-churning arrest and death of George Floyd; they are having the time of their lives. You don’t protest or mourn a victim by stealing oxycontin, electronics, jewelry, and sneakers.”

    Police are under assault, with “dozens” of serious injuries reported in such cities as New York, St. Louis, Los Angeles, Las Vegas and elsewhere. In New York alone, a policeman was run over by a car, while an officer in the Bronx was “mowed down” by an SUV. Meanwhile, Secret Service officers protecting the president were injured as rioters threw objects and lit fires near the White House.

    Then there’s this scary Daily Caller headline: “At Least Five Police Officers Reportedly Shot, One On Life Support As Rioters And Law Enforcement Battle Across The Country.”

    Meanwhile, according to CNN, a half dozen civilians have died in the violence, and it’s a wonder there haven’t been more.

    This is not “peaceful” protest, as Mac Donald points out. It’s a dangerous insurrection fueled by extremist, far-left elements of Antifa, which get succor and support from so-called “progressives” in the Democratic Party. They are supporting terrorists, and they know it.

    Nor are these spontaneous events. Rather, increasingly, police and other officials say it’s clear there’s both planning and funding behind the destruction, with some pointing a finger at the violent Antifa group. The “rage” people talk about is in fact cynically contrived.

    The Democratic Blue State governors and local officials who refuse to protect lives and property are doing their citizens and the nation’s rule of law a grave disservice. Their failure to act is itself a kind of misconduct at best, actual malfeasance at worst, given virtually all are sworn to protect our constitutional order.

    “If a city or state refuses to take the actions that are necessary to defend the life and property of their residents, then I will deploy the United States military and quickly solve the problem for them,” Trump said Monday.

    Nonetheless, some assert the use of U.S. troops of any kind to end these riots is illegal or at least questionable. They cite the Posse Comitatus Act, passed in 1878, that prohibits the use of federal troops in most cases.

    But they’re wrong. Because one of the things that the law, passed during Reconstruction after the Civil War, did was include the much-older Insurrection Acts, dating from 1807.

    As a 2018 research paper by the Congressional Research Service observed, “The Constitution permits Congress to authorize the use of the militia ‘to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions.’ And it guarantees the states protection against invasion or usurpation of their ‘republican form of government,’ and, upon the request of the state legislature, against domestic violence.”

    It’s one thing to question whether Trump should call out the military. That’s a fair debate. Honorable people can disagree.

    But make no mistake, Trump has the right and, a case can be made, the moral obligation in this instance, to call out U.S. troops to protect our republic from those who would overthrow our constitutional order. States, of course, are free to reject such help. But then again, telling citizens “you’re on your own” might not be a popular position for even a Trump-hating progressive to take.

    In short, though he’s been criticized by all the predictable sources, including by “never-Trumpers” on the right, Trump can call out troops to meet a challenge to our nation’s very existence. The Constitution is not a suicide pact.

    This violence is a sickness in our body politic far worse than COVID-19. Declaring Antifa a terrorist group is only the first step to finding a cure. We must stop Antifa and its allies from transforming America’s constitutional republic, based on individual rights, democracy and rule of law, into something quite different: A far-left, one-party, dictatorial dystopia with no rights at all.

    https://issuesinsights.com/2020/06/0...and-he-should/
    .

    80,000 Americans died and 900,000 were hospitalised just two years ago from flu including the most virulent Type A version of H3N2, so why didn't you arseholes call for the total destruction of the world's economic system then? I hope you have plenty of time to ponder over that when you all lose your houses, jobs and relationships!

  6. The Following User Groans At Grajonca For This Awful Post:

    signalmankenneth (06-03-2020)

Similar Threads

  1. GOP Plans Insurrection
    By katzgar in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-27-2019, 03:26 AM
  2. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-31-2018, 12:11 PM
  3. Trump says Defense Secretary Mattis will retire in February
    By signalmankenneth in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-20-2018, 04:18 PM
  4. Trump tweets out mattis may be Secretary of Defense
    By tsuke in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-20-2016, 11:17 AM
  5. Secretary of Defense
    By I Love America in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-07-2013, 08:27 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •