FreeSpeech (05-30-2020)
Members banned from this thread: evince |
FreeSpeech (05-30-2020)
"Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything." Joseph Stalin
The USA has lost WWIV to China with no other weapons but China Virus and some cash to buy democrats.
Nordberg (05-30-2020)
time for my copypasta
In addition to all of the facts exonerating Police Officer Wilson, In addition to a grand jury refusing to indict, I would also like to remind you that there was an independent, federal investigation by the Eric Holder led Department of Justice.
Their conclusions were as follows:
Fact 1: "Darren Wilson's actions do not constitute prosecutable violations":
Fact 2: "The evidence, when viewed as a whole, does not support the conclusion that Wilson use of deadly force were objectively unreasonable
(see above screenshot)
Fact 3: Michael Brown likely did reach into Wilson’s vehicle and grab the officer(from the report):
"Brown [reaching into SUV] is corroborated by bruising on Wilson's jaw and scratches on his neck, the presence of Browns' DNA on Wilson's collar, shirt, and pants, and Wilson's DNA on Brown's palm"
Fact 4: "Michael Brown did double back toward Darren Wilson "
Fact 5: The witnesses that were against Wilson had testimony that was "inconsistent with the physical and forensic evidence"
“Wilson attempted to open the driver’s door of the SUV to exit his vehicle, but as he swung it open, the door came into contact with Brown’s body and either rebounded closed or Brown pushed it closed. Wilson and other witnesses stated that Brown then reached into the SUV through the open driver’s window and punched and grabbed Wilson. This is corroborated by bruising on Wilson’s jaw and scratches on his neck, the presence of Brown’s DNA on Wilson’s collar, shirt, and pants, and Wilson’s DNA on Brown’s palm. While there are other individuals who stated that Wilson reached out of the SUV and grabbed Brown by the neck, prosecutors could not credit their accounts because they were inconsistent with physical and forensic evidence..”
sources:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...obably-not-up/
http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/doc...shooting/1436/
The argument would be something along the lines of ‘systemic racism in the police force’.
One of the problems I have with these issues when they come up is that so many people *assume* race was an issue. How can anyone be so sure the idiot cop wouldn’t have done thing to a white man?
White cop + black victim=racism!!
How is it even possible to start a conversation on how to fix things when that is going on?
Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017
Life is Golden (05-30-2020)
Protesters want to draw attention to injustice.
Rioters just want free TVs.
PoliTalker (05-31-2020)
It's definitely possible this cop was just a bad cop and an a*hole. Sounds like he had a history of bad behavior and its possible it was against people of all races. So the reflexive response is to yell racism, and it's possible it was racially motivated, but it's also possible it wasn't.
PoliTalker (05-31-2020)
DNA. Brown's DNA was found on the gun.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_Michael_Brown
Jobs.
"It [the draft] is duty rather than slavery. I part with the author on the caviler idea that individual freedom (whatever that may be to the person) leads to nirvana, anyone older that 12 knows that is BS."
-(Midcan5)
"Allow me to masturbate my patriotism furiously and publicly at this opportunity."
-(Ib1yysguy)
"There is no 'equal opportunity' today unless the government makes it so."
-(apple0154 )
"abortion is not killing Its birth control"
-(Desh)
Bookmarks