IF ONE OF THESE PICTURES OFFENDS YOU...

[Doc Dutch]

Hello Dutch Uncle,



I would call that one very troubling.

Child soldier training?

War is not something to be glorified.

It is awful.

No, it's not, but it is the common gun-banning opinion of the far left.

[TOP]

You seem to be convinced of that. Perhaps you ought to search for a thread that speaks about good animated movies.

So, I'm correct...You're not interested in having an actual discussion....I haven't seen effort on your part so far to do so....

[Mason Michaels]

So, I'm correct...You're not interested in having an actual discussion....I haven't seen effort on your part so far to do so....

STFU troll

[Frank Apisa]

He should have taken a different route.

There were people in Great Britain who thought the signers of the Declaration of Independence should have taken a different route.

We all get to choose our own route.

[Frank Apisa]

So, I'm correct...You're not interested in having an actual discussion....I haven't seen effort on your part so far to do so....

TOP, I am sure there are lots of things you "haven't seen.

For instance, it appears you haven't seen that Trump is one of the most disgusting people on this planet...and is a total disaster as the president of the United States.

But I suspect the things you "haven't seen"...you haven't seen not because they are not there, but because you are incapable or unwilling to see them.

You oughta do something about that.

[TOP]

TOP, I am sure there are lots of things you "haven't seen.

For instance, it appears you haven't seen that Trump is one of the most disgusting people on this planet...and is a total disaster as the president of the United States.

But I suspect the things you "haven't seen"...you haven't seen not because they are not there, but because you are incapable or unwilling to see them.

You oughta do something about that.

My posts here are in reference to this thread...why try to deflect?

[Mason Melchizedek]

My posts here are in reference to this thread...why try to deflect?

He called you out!Answer chicken shit

[Frank Apisa]

My posts here are in reference to this thread...why try to deflect?

I am not deflecting.

I am telling you that what you supposedly "haven't seen" is bullshit.

If you want to discuss something with me...I will discuss it.

[TOP]

I am not deflecting.

I am telling you that what you supposedly "haven't seen" is bullshit.

If you want to discuss something with me...I will discuss it.

Perhaps another time, another thread..

"I suspect more Trump supporters are offended by the second picture than the first. Although they will probably pretend they are offended by both."
"TOP, I am sure there are lots of things you "haven't seen.

For instance, it appears you haven't seen that Trump is one of the most disgusting people on this planet...and is a total disaster as the president of the United States.

But I suspect the things you "haven't seen"...you haven't seen not because they are not there, but because you are incapable or unwilling to see them."

You oughta do something about that.
Won't do much good if you've already decided (Or "suspect" how others you've labeled will respond and what we think...or what I've seen or not seen....)
I think you might be surprised at what I've "done about that" ...and what "I've seen"...

[Frank Apisa]

Perhaps another time, another thread..

"I suspect more Trump supporters are offended by the second picture than the first. Although they will probably pretend they are offended by both."
"TOP, I am sure there are lots of things you "haven't seen.

For instance, it appears you haven't seen that Trump is one of the most disgusting people on this planet...and is a total disaster as the president of the United States.

But I suspect the things you "haven't seen"...you haven't seen not because they are not there, but because you are incapable or unwilling to see them."

You oughta do something about that.
Won't do much good if you've already decided (Or "suspect" how others you've labeled will respond and what we think...or what I've seen or not seen....)
I think you might be surprised at what I've "done about that" ...and what "I've seen"...

What I would be astonished about (surprised is the wrong word) is if you eventually wake up and see Trump for what he is.

I doubt that will be tested. You don't have it in you.

[TOP]

What I would be astonished about (surprised is the wrong word) is if you eventually wake up and see Trump for what he is.

I doubt that will be tested. You don't have it in you.

This thread isn't about the president, though....

[Mason Melchizedek]

Perhaps another time, another thread..

"I suspect more Trump supporters are offended by the second picture than the first. Although they will probably pretend they are offended by both."
"TOP, I am sure there are lots of things you "haven't seen.

For instance, it appears you haven't seen that Trump is one of the most disgusting people on this planet...and is a total disaster as the president of the United States.

But I suspect the things you "haven't seen"...you haven't seen not because they are not there, but because you are incapable or unwilling to see them."

You oughta do something about that.
Won't do much good if you've already decided (Or "suspect" how others you've labeled will respond and what we think...or what I've seen or not seen....)
I think you might be surprised at what I've "done about that" ...and what "I've seen"...

You're right more Trump supporters are offended by Kap protesting.
Then a white cop murdering a black man.
That includes you

[Eagle_Eye]

...it says a lot more about you than about the pictures.












Both are about the use of a knee.

The first one tells you why the second was needed.

I suspect more Trump supporters are offended by the second picture than the first. Although they will probably pretend they are offended by both

Neither pic is offensive out of context. They only become offensive when one knows the facts behind the photo.

Pic 1 shows a cop abusing a cuffed prisoner. The picture doesn't show the man is cuffed. When that fact is known it becomes offensive.
Pic 2 shows a black football player kneeling, they do it all the time. It only becomes and issue when one knows when and why the action is taken.

Once we know the facts about pic 1 it becomes not only offensive but a blatant display of police brutality and must be eradicated.

Now let me ask you what became the focus of the 2nd pic? He was protesting the treatment of blacks as shown in pic 1, but his venue didn't being focus and attention on that issue as he supposedly intended. It became a matter of national pride. The left likes to say he made his point and brought attention to police brutality. Most conservatives disagree and say the issue became an example of ones of a lack of pride in ones nation. As I have said I have no problem with you remaining seated or not holding your hand over your heart that is your choice not to honor and to ignore the anthem as you wish. But to physically stand and drop to one knee is not ignoring the anthem it is a direct display of animosity to the anthem and what it stands for. I know you will disagree like all the other liberals. But you have my take on both

[StoneByStone]

Your offense is noted.

Does this one offend you too?

Not offended, just kinda confused. The thread was about the police and racism, now all of a sudden we're talking about guns.
#random

[ThatOwlWoman]

You really aren't interested in having an actual discussion about this subject then, are you?

We know that *you* aren't. Just another chance to get attention and bash the black guy(s). It's what you KKKers do.

Toxic's selfie: