do you think posting here has the same reach as Twitter for ex.?
and "lying" in politics is a very difficult mountain to climb. It's largely a p.o.v.
the dude sound just like Clinton and her Deplorables whatever you think of Clinton -would you want her as a neutral arbitor??
If someone lies, and people believe that lie, shouldn't Twitter educate people on how they've been lied to?
If a student says the Earth is flat, the teacher is supposed to correct them. The teacher isn't supposed to say that's just your opinion.
This is a common way people defend Trump. It's the "alternative facts" strategy.
your standard reply when you have nothing else
who's determining the "lie" -a political HACK with extreme animus towards Trump!If you lie on Twitter, you should be called out and corrected.
politics is almost always a shade of greyNope. A fact is a fact and a lie is a lie. You're using the Fascist "alternative facts" argument.
No in this particular case they were simply spreading DNC misinformation. The security concerns and voter fraud linked to universal mail in ballots and ballot harvesting are well known, well documented, and not open to debate.
They are the new public square and big tech has a monopoly over it and are using that monopoly for mass media manipulation and censorship. Try to sell your bullshit to someone who didn't witness them completely deplatform Tommy Robinson, Alex Jones, and Laura Loomer.
And Twitter isn't the government, it's a private company. Even if Trump was banned from Twitter, he could always go to another platform. In Nazi Germany, ALL platforms were under Goebbels' control. If Goebbels banned you from one platform, that's it, you'd have no other options. Comparing that to Twitter is just ignorant.
There is no other platform that's the point, big tech holds a monopoly and the collude to promote unfair barriers to entry for competitors by keeping them out if Google search algorithms or the smart phone app stores.
They are Orwellian fascists and you love them for it you Nazi fuck.
Bookmarks