Media poutrage over K Mac

[Earl]

get the fuck outta here with that noise.

Do you have ANY clues about falsification of FISA, altering 302's and appointing a S.Council
when Page has testifies that they all knew there was no evidence of any Russian "collusion" even before Trump was sworn in?

https://www.inquisitr.com/6015180/ci...2016-election/
According to Fleitz, House Intelligence Committee staff members told him they found “conflicting intelligence” on Russia’s motivations for interfering in the 2016 election, which ran parallel to an FBI investigation into Trump’s campaign. In addition, the officials allegedly told Fleitz that Brennan “suppressed facts or analysis” that suggested it was in Russia’s interest for Clinton — who the country reportedly believed was ” more predictable and malleable” — to win the election.

“They also told me that Brennan suppressed that intelligence over the objections of CIA analysts,” Fleitz wrote.

The House Intelligence Committee staff reportedly claimed Brennan’s team opted out of using “high-quality” intelligence that hinted at a Russian preference of a Clinton win and instead relied on “low-quality” information to support the theory that Russia wanted Trump to win.

Indeed.

[anatta]

Well, why does she need to take a cattle prod to the media to get them to do reporting on Obamagate?

lol..Dems are a protected species

[BartenderElite]

I'm not. not yet. I'm waiting for more declassification

But it's clear the un-maskings were a targeted surveillance on Flynn and not just random wants.
Why was the UN Ambassador (Powers) asking for Flynn's un-masking (etc) she isn't an investigator.

Oh, okay - so, it's pending.

At least you're not on the Fox/OP train of "sedition!" (it's the new collusion)

[Frank Apisa]

Useless as IVANKA, KELLYANN and the FLOTUS.

Exactly.

And just as plastic!

I've seem lawn ornaments with more realism.

[Frank Apisa]

Well, why does she need to take a cattle prod to the media to get them to do reporting on Obamagate?

She doesn't.

Obamagate has been thoroughly reported. It is an invention of the Trump campaign to attempt to detract from the fact that Trump is the worst, most incompetent president in US history...and that Trump is a generally disgusting human being.

[Darth Omar]

Are people still using the term "Obamagate" with a straight face?

I use it as a catch all.

Obama may or may not be implicated in it but the FISA abuse..etc..etc...all occurred under his watch—or under his nose.

Can people still claim the Obama Administration was scandal free with a straight face?

And how would it be in say, 2022, if it comes out that the FBI, under Trump, was abusing the FISA process to spy on someone in the Biden campaign?

No need to answer. We both know how it would go.

[BartenderElite]

I use it as a catch all.

Obama may or may not be implicated in it but the FISA abuse..etc..etc...all occurred under his watch—or under his nose.

Can people still claim the Obama Administration was scandal free with a straight face?

And how would it be in say, 2022, if it comes out that the FBI, under Trump, was abusing the FISA process to spy on someone in the Biden campaign?

No need to answer. We both know how it would go.

Your nearly impossible hypocrisy is noted.

[BartenderElite]

By your logic, collusion was fine - because Trump is definitely guilty of somethin'....

[Frank Apisa]

I use it as a catch all.

Obama may or may not be implicated in it but the FISA abuse..etc..etc...all occurred under his watch—or under his nose.

Can people still claim the Obama Administration was scandal free with a straight face?

And how would it be in say, 2022, if it comes out that the FBI, under Trump, was abusing the FISA process to spy on someone in the Biden campaign?

No need to answer. We both know how it would go.

"Scandal free"...and "the Trump Administration" are so far apart, it is incredible that you used them in whatever you were trying to suggest.

The Nixon Administration was relatively scandal free when compared with the Trump fiasco.

[anatta]

By your logic, collusion was fine - because Trump is definitely guilty of somethin'....

there was no collusion. guilty of "something?' ROFL

[BartenderElite]

there was no collusion. guilty of "something?' ROFL

He covered up COVID for a month, for starters. But that's Darth's logic, not mine - it's okay to throw around "GATE", because they're sure to find something.

The double standard w/ you guys is so epic, so gargantuan. I'm actually laughing out loud.

[Earl]

I use it as a catch all.

Obama may or may not be implicated in it but the FISA abuse..etc..etc...all occurred under his watch—or under his nose.

Can people still claim the Obama Administration was scandal free with a straight face?

And how would it be in say, 2022, if it comes out that the FBI, under Trump, was abusing the FISA process to spy on someone in the Biden campaign?

No need to answer. We both know how it would go.

FBI official texted 'POTUS (Obama)wants to know everything we're ...thehill.com › homenews › senate › 372722-fbi-official-...
Feb 7, 2018 - FBI official texted 'POTUS wants to know everything we're doing': report. By Max Greenwood 318 Tweet Share More. Lisa Page, the FBI official ...

Obama won’t go to jail but his legacy is tarnished forever.

[tsuke]

This thread shows liberals are afraid of strong women. Sad!

[archives]

Well, why does she need to take a cattle prod to the media to get them to do reporting on Obamagate?

Probably cause innuendo ain’t news

[Trumpet]

This thread shows liberals are afraid of strong women. Sad!

OMG, you mean strong fibbing women.