Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 42

Thread: What is Obamagate

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    15,536
    Thanks
    1,378
    Thanked 3,981 Times in 3,024 Posts
    Groans
    130
    Groaned 841 Times in 781 Posts

    Default What is Obamagate

    I was asked by a liberal friend to explain what Obamagate is. I figured I would share it here too.

    If your really interested I can try to explain it. The main allegation is that Obama weaponized the FBI to first help Clinton get elected and second when that failed to hinder the Trump campaign.

    The first portion is of course before the election. The allegation in this portion is that an investigation was started and selectively leaked to the press to make the Trump campaign look bad. The allegation is that the investigation should never have been started in the first place.

    The first piece of thing people mention is of course the steele dossier. They say this is a piece of unverified information. So unverified that you dont even know who the primary source was as these were all things supposedly from steeles russian contacts who may have just heard it from other people so an investigation into a political campaign shouldnt have been started with it at its basis.

    Second the allegation is the FISA warrants for Carter Page should never have been given. The allegation is that the fbi knowingly misled the FISA court with false information to get these warrants. The stances seem to be that on the Democrats side they say that this behavior is ok because it is not politically motivated. On the Republican side they say politically motivated or not it is an egregious violation of civil liberties. They also mention that all errors went against the Trump campaign. It is worth noting at this point that the FISA court itself wrote a letter to the FBI asking it to explain its behavior and any changes it would need to make for the FISA court to trust it again.

    Thisd would be popodopalous in the bar. The allegation is that he was a very minor part of the Trump campaign and wouldnt have known of any russian collusion and an investigation shouldnt have been started on his behalf. Especially not for things he said while he was drunk. The contention here is that there should be a considerably higher bar for investigating a political campaign. Especially one of the party not in power to avoid the appearance of impropriety.

    The benefits of the pre election phase were to allegedly allow what conservatives consider pro democrat media like the New York Times etc to run a slew of anti trump headlines.

    Now fast forward to phase 2.

    Obama enacts sanctions against Russians a week or two weeks before the Trump administration takes over. Micheal Flynn the a part of the incoming Trump admin talks to the Russian ambassador and asks the Russians not to overreact to the sanctions and wait for the Trump admin. The initial alleged wrong here is a violation of the Logan act. By asking the Russians to essentially keep the peace it is alleged that Flynn was undermining the position of the Obama administration. Of course if keeping the peace is undermining thier position then thier position would have been to escalate tensions with Russia. This then sets up the meeting with Flynn and his lie about speaking with the Russian ambassador.

    Now the allegations on the Trump side are first it was well within the rights of the incoming administration to speak with foreign governments as every other single transition has done before them so the questioning should not have happened in the first place. Second that the questioning itself was improper. The evidence cited for this is that Comey himself mentions he would not have tried this with any other administration and took the opportunity presented by a chaotic transition. Third the allegation from the Flynn team is that during the court proceedings the FBI 1) withheld exculpatory evidence and 2) threatened to go after his son if he did not plead guilty.

    The benefits for the second part of course is an easy scandal for Democrats to report on (again with the percieved Democrat leaning media like the New York Times) as well as an excuse for Democrat campaign strategists to write of thier loss when they had every concievable advantage.

    It is worth noting as well that at this point no direct evidence can tie all of this to Obama. If your a Democrat that would be enough for you to write all of this of if your a Republican you would probably still ask why all of this happen even if Obama himself had no direct ties to it.

    Anyway thats the best summary I can make.
    is on twitter @realtsuke

    https://tsukesthoughts.wordpress.com/

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to tsuke For This Post:

    Darth Omar (05-26-2020), Earl (05-26-2020)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    28,403
    Thanks
    26,104
    Thanked 11,856 Times in 8,415 Posts
    Groans
    18
    Groaned 2,290 Times in 2,172 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tsuke View Post
    I was asked by a liberal friend to explain what Obamagate is. I figured I would share it here too.

    If your really interested I can try to explain it. The main allegation is that Obama weaponized the FBI to first help Clinton get elected and second when that failed to hinder the Trump campaign.

    The first portion is of course before the election. The allegation in this portion is that an investigation was started and selectively leaked to the press to make the Trump campaign look bad. The allegation is that the investigation should never have been started in the first place.

    The first piece of thing people mention is of course the steele dossier. They say this is a piece of unverified information. So unverified that you dont even know who the primary source was as these were all things supposedly from steeles russian contacts who may have just heard it from other people so an investigation into a political campaign shouldnt have been started with it at its basis.

    Second the allegation is the FISA warrants for Carter Page should never have been given. The allegation is that the fbi knowingly misled the FISA court with false information to get these warrants. The stances seem to be that on the Democrats side they say that this behavior is ok because it is not politically motivated. On the Republican side they say politically motivated or not it is an egregious violation of civil liberties. They also mention that all errors went against the Trump campaign. It is worth noting at this point that the FISA court itself wrote a letter to the FBI asking it to explain its behavior and any changes it would need to make for the FISA court to trust it again.

    Thisd would be popodopalous in the bar. The allegation is that he was a very minor part of the Trump campaign and wouldnt have known of any russian collusion and an investigation shouldnt have been started on his behalf. Especially not for things he said while he was drunk. The contention here is that there should be a considerably higher bar for investigating a political campaign. Especially one of the party not in power to avoid the appearance of impropriety.

    The benefits of the pre election phase were to allegedly allow what conservatives consider pro democrat media like the New York Times etc to run a slew of anti trump headlines.

    Now fast forward to phase 2.

    Obama enacts sanctions against Russians a week or two weeks before the Trump administration takes over. Micheal Flynn the a part of the incoming Trump admin talks to the Russian ambassador and asks the Russians not to overreact to the sanctions and wait for the Trump admin. The initial alleged wrong here is a violation of the Logan act. By asking the Russians to essentially keep the peace it is alleged that Flynn was undermining the position of the Obama administration. Of course if keeping the peace is undermining thier position then thier position would have been to escalate tensions with Russia. This then sets up the meeting with Flynn and his lie about speaking with the Russian ambassador.

    Now the allegations on the Trump side are first it was well within the rights of the incoming administration to speak with foreign governments as every other single transition has done before them so the questioning should not have happened in the first place. Second that the questioning itself was improper. The evidence cited for this is that Comey himself mentions he would not have tried this with any other administration and took the opportunity presented by a chaotic transition. Third the allegation from the Flynn team is that during the court proceedings the FBI 1) withheld exculpatory evidence and 2) threatened to go after his son if he did not plead guilty.

    The benefits for the second part of course is an easy scandal for Democrats to report on (again with the percieved Democrat leaning media like the New York Times) as well as an excuse for Democrat campaign strategists to write of thier loss when they had every concievable advantage.

    It is worth noting as well that at this point no direct evidence can tie all of this to Obama. If your a Democrat that would be enough for you to write all of this of if your a Republican you would probably still ask why all of this happen even if Obama himself had no direct ties to it.

    Anyway thats the best summary I can make.
    All you're doing here is parroting Trump's debunked lies, which Trump is using to defect his involvement with Russia.

  4. The Following User Groans At Trumpet For This Awful Post:

    Earl (05-26-2020)

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Trumpet For This Post:

    Phantasmal (05-26-2020)

  6. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tsuke View Post
    I was asked by a liberal friend to explain what Obamagate is. I figured I would share it here too.

    If your really interested I can try to explain it. The main allegation is that Obama weaponized the FBI to first help Clinton get elected and second when that failed to hinder the Trump campaign.

    The first portion is of course before the election. The allegation in this portion is that an investigation was started and selectively leaked to the press to make the Trump campaign look bad. The allegation is that the investigation should never have been started in the first place.

    The first piece of thing people mention is of course the steele dossier. They say this is a piece of unverified information. So unverified that you dont even know who the primary source was as these were all things supposedly from steeles russian contacts who may have just heard it from other people so an investigation into a political campaign shouldnt have been started with it at its basis.

    Second the allegation is the FISA warrants for Carter Page should never have been given. The allegation is that the fbi knowingly misled the FISA court with false information to get these warrants. The stances seem to be that on the Democrats side they say that this behavior is ok because it is not politically motivated. On the Republican side they say politically motivated or not it is an egregious violation of civil liberties. They also mention that all errors went against the Trump campaign. It is worth noting at this point that the FISA court itself wrote a letter to the FBI asking it to explain its behavior and any changes it would need to make for the FISA court to trust it again.

    Thisd would be popodopalous in the bar. The allegation is that he was a very minor part of the Trump campaign and wouldnt have known of any russian collusion and an investigation shouldnt have been started on his behalf. Especially not for things he said while he was drunk. The contention here is that there should be a considerably higher bar for investigating a political campaign. Especially one of the party not in power to avoid the appearance of impropriety.

    The benefits of the pre election phase were to allegedly allow what conservatives consider pro democrat media like the New York Times etc to run a slew of anti trump headlines.

    Now fast forward to phase 2.

    Obama enacts sanctions against Russians a week or two weeks before the Trump administration takes over. Micheal Flynn the a part of the incoming Trump admin talks to the Russian ambassador and asks the Russians not to overreact to the sanctions and wait for the Trump admin. The initial alleged wrong here is a violation of the Logan act. By asking the Russians to essentially keep the peace it is alleged that Flynn was undermining the position of the Obama administration. Of course if keeping the peace is undermining thier position then thier position would have been to escalate tensions with Russia. This then sets up the meeting with Flynn and his lie about speaking with the Russian ambassador.

    Now the allegations on the Trump side are first it was well within the rights of the incoming administration to speak with foreign governments as every other single transition has done before them so the questioning should not have happened in the first place. Second that the questioning itself was improper. The evidence cited for this is that Comey himself mentions he would not have tried this with any other administration and took the opportunity presented by a chaotic transition. Third the allegation from the Flynn team is that during the court proceedings the FBI 1) withheld exculpatory evidence and 2) threatened to go after his son if he did not plead guilty.

    The benefits for the second part of course is an easy scandal for Democrats to report on (again with the percieved Democrat leaning media like the New York Times) as well as an excuse for Democrat campaign strategists to write of thier loss when they had every concievable advantage.

    It is worth noting as well that at this point no direct evidence can tie all of this to Obama. If your a Democrat that would be enough for you to write all of this of if your a Republican you would probably still ask why all of this happen even if Obama himself had no direct ties to it.

    Anyway thats the best summary I can make.

  7. The Following User Groans At StoneByStone For This Awful Post:

    Earl (05-26-2020)

  8. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Central New Jersey
    Posts
    23,253
    Thanks
    13,544
    Thanked 12,185 Times in 7,629 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,051 Times in 998 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tsuke View Post
    I was asked by a liberal friend to explain what Obamagate is. I figured I would share it here too.

    If your really interested I can try to explain it. The main allegation is that Obama weaponized the FBI to first help Clinton get elected and second when that failed to hinder the Trump campaign.

    The first portion is of course before the election. The allegation in this portion is that an investigation was started and selectively leaked to the press to make the Trump campaign look bad. The allegation is that the investigation should never have been started in the first place.

    The first piece of thing people mention is of course the steele dossier. They say this is a piece of unverified information. So unverified that you dont even know who the primary source was as these were all things supposedly from steeles russian contacts who may have just heard it from other people so an investigation into a political campaign shouldnt have been started with it at its basis.

    Second the allegation is the FISA warrants for Carter Page should never have been given. The allegation is that the fbi knowingly misled the FISA court with false information to get these warrants. The stances seem to be that on the Democrats side they say that this behavior is ok because it is not politically motivated. On the Republican side they say politically motivated or not it is an egregious violation of civil liberties. They also mention that all errors went against the Trump campaign. It is worth noting at this point that the FISA court itself wrote a letter to the FBI asking it to explain its behavior and any changes it would need to make for the FISA court to trust it again.

    Thisd would be popodopalous in the bar. The allegation is that he was a very minor part of the Trump campaign and wouldnt have known of any russian collusion and an investigation shouldnt have been started on his behalf. Especially not for things he said while he was drunk. The contention here is that there should be a considerably higher bar for investigating a political campaign. Especially one of the party not in power to avoid the appearance of impropriety.

    The benefits of the pre election phase were to allegedly allow what conservatives consider pro democrat media like the New York Times etc to run a slew of anti trump headlines.

    Now fast forward to phase 2.

    Obama enacts sanctions against Russians a week or two weeks before the Trump administration takes over. Micheal Flynn the a part of the incoming Trump admin talks to the Russian ambassador and asks the Russians not to overreact to the sanctions and wait for the Trump admin. The initial alleged wrong here is a violation of the Logan act. By asking the Russians to essentially keep the peace it is alleged that Flynn was undermining the position of the Obama administration. Of course if keeping the peace is undermining thier position then thier position would have been to escalate tensions with Russia. This then sets up the meeting with Flynn and his lie about speaking with the Russian ambassador.

    Now the allegations on the Trump side are first it was well within the rights of the incoming administration to speak with foreign governments as every other single transition has done before them so the questioning should not have happened in the first place. Second that the questioning itself was improper. The evidence cited for this is that Comey himself mentions he would not have tried this with any other administration and took the opportunity presented by a chaotic transition. Third the allegation from the Flynn team is that during the court proceedings the FBI 1) withheld exculpatory evidence and 2) threatened to go after his son if he did not plead guilty.

    The benefits for the second part of course is an easy scandal for Democrats to report on (again with the percieved Democrat leaning media like the New York Times) as well as an excuse for Democrat campaign strategists to write of thier loss when they had every concievable advantage.

    It is worth noting as well that at this point no direct evidence can tie all of this to Obama. If your a Democrat that would be enough for you to write all of this of if your a Republican you would probably still ask why all of this happen even if Obama himself had no direct ties to it.

    Anyway thats the best summary I can make.
    I can explain what Obamagate is better than that.

    Obamagate is a bunch of bullshit concocted by Trump supporters that has about as much significance as a flea on camel.
    ON HIS WORST DAY, JOE BIDEN IS A BETTER PRESIDENT THAN TRUMP WAS ON HIS BEST DAY!

  9. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Frank Apisa For This Post:

    Phantasmal (05-26-2020), Trumpet (05-26-2020)

  10. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    22,864
    Thanks
    1,440
    Thanked 15,405 Times in 9,440 Posts
    Groans
    101
    Groaned 1,894 Times in 1,783 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    What is Obamagate? Another in a long line of idiotic conspiracy theories advanced by Dear Leader and the cult.

  11. The Following User Groans At Concart For This Awful Post:

    Earl (05-26-2020)

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Concart For This Post:

    Frank Apisa (05-27-2020), Trumpet (05-26-2020)

  13. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    52,293
    Thanks
    77,766
    Thanked 23,568 Times in 17,849 Posts
    Groans
    38,678
    Groaned 3,238 Times in 3,042 Posts
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tsuke View Post
    I was asked by a liberal friend to explain what Obamagate is. I figured I would share it here too.

    If your really interested I can try to explain it. The main allegation is that Obama weaponized the FBI to first help Clinton get elected and second when that failed to hinder the Trump campaign.

    The first portion is of course before the election. The allegation in this portion is that an investigation was started and selectively leaked to the press to make the Trump campaign look bad. The allegation is that the investigation should never have been started in the first place.

    The first piece of thing people mention is of course the steele dossier. They say this is a piece of unverified information. So unverified that you dont even know who the primary source was as these were all things supposedly from steeles russian contacts who may have just heard it from other people so an investigation into a political campaign shouldnt have been started with it at its basis.

    Second the allegation is the FISA warrants for Carter Page should never have been given. The allegation is that the fbi knowingly misled the FISA court with false information to get these warrants. The stances seem to be that on the Democrats side they say that this behavior is ok because it is not politically motivated. On the Republican side they say politically motivated or not it is an egregious violation of civil liberties. They also mention that all errors went against the Trump campaign. It is worth noting at this point that the FISA court itself wrote a letter to the FBI asking it to explain its behavior and any changes it would need to make for the FISA court to trust it again.

    Thisd would be popodopalous in the bar. The allegation is that he was a very minor part of the Trump campaign and wouldnt have known of any russian collusion and an investigation shouldnt have been started on his behalf. Especially not for things he said while he was drunk. The contention here is that there should be a considerably higher bar for investigating a political campaign. Especially one of the party not in power to avoid the appearance of impropriety.

    The benefits of the pre election phase were to allegedly allow what conservatives consider pro democrat media like the New York Times etc to run a slew of anti trump headlines.

    Now fast forward to phase 2.

    Obama enacts sanctions against Russians a week or two weeks before the Trump administration takes over. Micheal Flynn the a part of the incoming Trump admin talks to the Russian ambassador and asks the Russians not to overreact to the sanctions and wait for the Trump admin. The initial alleged wrong here is a violation of the Logan act. By asking the Russians to essentially keep the peace it is alleged that Flynn was undermining the position of the Obama administration. Of course if keeping the peace is undermining thier position then thier position would have been to escalate tensions with Russia. This then sets up the meeting with Flynn and his lie about speaking with the Russian ambassador.

    Now the allegations on the Trump side are first it was well within the rights of the incoming administration to speak with foreign governments as every other single transition has done before them so the questioning should not have happened in the first place. Second that the questioning itself was improper. The evidence cited for this is that Comey himself mentions he would not have tried this with any other administration and took the opportunity presented by a chaotic transition. Third the allegation from the Flynn team is that during the court proceedings the FBI 1) withheld exculpatory evidence and 2) threatened to go after his son if he did not plead guilty.

    The benefits for the second part of course is an easy scandal for Democrats to report on (again with the percieved Democrat leaning media like the New York Times) as well as an excuse for Democrat campaign strategists to write of thier loss when they had every concievable advantage.

    It is worth noting as well that at this point no direct evidence can tie all of this to Obama. If your a Democrat that would be enough for you to write all of this of if your a Republican you would probably still ask why all of this happen even if Obama himself had no direct ties to it.

    Anyway thats the best summary I can make.
    Indeed.

    Excellent summarization.

    I expect that US Attorney Durham is perusing this also.

    Obama’s legacy is forever tarnished.

  14. The Following 2 Users Groan At Earl For This Awful Post:

    AProudLefty (05-26-2020), signalmankenneth (05-26-2020)

  15. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,963
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,041 Times in 13,848 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    All you did was regurgitate the same lame narrative anyone can on hear talk radio or any demagogue’s show

    Nothing new here to see, next

  16. The Following User Groans At archives For This Awful Post:

    Earl (05-26-2020)

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to archives For This Post:

    Trumpet (05-26-2020)

  18. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    52,293
    Thanks
    77,766
    Thanked 23,568 Times in 17,849 Posts
    Groans
    38,678
    Groaned 3,238 Times in 3,042 Posts
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    All you did was regurgitate the same lame narrative anyone can on hear talk radio or any demagogue’s show

    Nothing new here to see, next
    Tell US Attorney Durham this.

    You are whistling past the cemetary, Anchovies.

    Democrats love investigations. You are getting one as we speak.

  19. The Following User Groans At Earl For This Awful Post:

    AProudLefty (05-26-2020)

  20. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    9,090
    Thanks
    3,487
    Thanked 3,433 Times in 2,367 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 888 Times in 802 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Obama-gate is a made up Trump hoax.
    Russian trolls and their supporters go on Ignore, automatically: no second chance.


  21. The Following User Says Thank You to jimmymccready For This Post:

    Trumpet (05-26-2020)

  22. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,527
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 24,571 Times in 17,095 Posts
    Groans
    5,280
    Groaned 4,575 Times in 4,254 Posts

    Default

    The American spy networks were listening in on Kislyak's conversations. Flynn was talking to him. because he was being paid by Russia. He was also being paid by Turkey which he forgot to mention, Flynn was an unregistered foreign agent. That is a crime. He was being hired as a National Security Adviser. Can't you see the conflicts? It is so obvious that he was in a position to be blackmailed or pressured. Yates had the nerve to tell Trump he was compromised. He fired her. Flynns double-dealing was known be Obama. Trump ignored him too. ` 4

  23. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Nordberg For This Post:

    Phantasmal (05-26-2020), Trumpet (05-26-2020)

  24. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    28,546
    Thanks
    3,865
    Thanked 12,031 Times in 8,286 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 2,673 Times in 2,479 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Earl View Post
    I expect that US Attorney Durham is perusing this also.
    You want Durham to be reading random internet posts? Why isn't he calling witnesses, or presenting evidence to a grand jury? Why isn't there evidence?

  25. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Walt For This Post:

    Phantasmal (05-26-2020), Trumpet (05-26-2020)

  26. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    28,546
    Thanks
    3,865
    Thanked 12,031 Times in 8,286 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 2,673 Times in 2,479 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Earl View Post
    You are getting one as we speak.
    Where?

  27. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    15,536
    Thanks
    1,378
    Thanked 3,981 Times in 3,024 Posts
    Groans
    130
    Groaned 841 Times in 781 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    The American spy networks were listening in on Kislyak's conversations. Flynn was talking to him. because he was being paid by Russia. He was also being paid by Turkey which he forgot to mention, Flynn was an unregistered foreign agent. That is a crime. He was being hired as a National Security Adviser. Can't you see the conflicts? It is so obvious that he was in a position to be blackmailed or pressured. Yates had the nerve to tell Trump he was compromised. He fired her. Flynns double-dealing was known be Obama. Trump ignored him too. ` 4
    Let me get this straight. The only reason why a member of an incoming administration would talk to another major world power is because he was being paid by them? Nothing else? For people who claim to hate wars like Afghanistan and Iraq you have a very dim view of someone trying to prevent an escalation of tensions with Russia.

    Now on to Turkey. Given that the initial charge against Flynn was a violation of the Logan Act as he spoke to Russia the intelligence agencies did not seem to have a problem with his Turkish dealings. If they did they would have charged him with something along those lines.
    is on twitter @realtsuke

    https://tsukesthoughts.wordpress.com/

  28. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Concart View Post
    What is Obamagate? Another in a long line of idiotic conspiracy theories advanced by Dear Leader and the cult.
    Unless you rejected the Trump/Russian conspiracy theory you can’t throw stones.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  29. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    20,426
    Thanks
    1,794
    Thanked 11,074 Times in 6,784 Posts
    Groans
    888
    Groaned 1,829 Times in 1,694 Posts

    Default

    It's a catch-word in desperate search of an actual scandal.

Similar Threads

  1. APP - Interesting Obamagate theory
    By canceled.2021.2 in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-19-2020, 07:48 AM
  2. Obamagate Is Not a Conspiracy Theory
    By Grokmaster in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 05-17-2020, 04:44 PM
  3. Arminius reports: All you need to know about Obamagate
    By Legion in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 60
    Last Post: 05-16-2020, 03:17 PM
  4. Hildebeast implicated in Obamagate?
    By Legion in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 196
    Last Post: 05-16-2020, 06:03 AM
  5. Obamagate in the news
    By Legion in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-14-2020, 05:29 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •