CDC's New 'Best Estimate' Implies a COVID-19 Infection Fatality Rate Below 0.3%

[RB 60]

Yep.

Number of deaths - 99,805
Number of confirmed cases - 1,706,226

5.8%

How many unconfirmed cases were/are there? How many had it and it wasn't much worse than the flu? How many had it and never shown any symptoms?
So when it comes to the accuracy of the "numbers," without knowing how many survived it without being tested, how could the "numbers" be accurate?

[cancel2 2022]

How many unconfirmed cases were/are there? How many had it and it wasn't much worse than the flu? How many had it and never shown any symptoms?
So when it comes to the accuracy of the "numbers," without knowing how many survived it without being tested, how could the "numbers" be accurate?

I told the cunt that but he's one of the most arrogant pricks on here albeit there is some stiff competition (pun intended).

[RB 60]

I told the cunt that but he's one of the most arrogant pricks on here albeit there is some stiff competition (pun intended).

Sometimes it takes a few repeats for things to sink in, other times he's simply clueless. No doubt, he's got plenty of competition, but he's right up there with the worst of them.

[domer76]

How many unconfirmed cases were/are there? How many had it and it wasn't much worse than the flu? How many had it and never shown any symptoms?
So when it comes to the accuracy of the "numbers," without knowing how many survived it without being tested, how could the "numbers" be accurate?

Hey, stupid fuck. The numbers I provide come from CDC and worldometer. Don’t like them? Tough shit. Go ahead and provide better numbers if you’d like.

But you won’t.

[Darth Omar]

I hope so, but that would be still many times higher and more virulent than the flu.

Your hope is not ill-founded lol.

The COVID mortality rate has been trending down, from the start, and likely hasn’t found the bottom yet.

[Darth Omar]

Hey, stupid fuck. The numbers I provide come from CDC and worldometer. Don’t like them? Tough shit. Go ahead and provide better numbers if you’d like.

But you won’t.

2.1 million deaths.

[midcan5]

Can anyone explain why the deaths of fellow Americans from a virus is a hoax to right wing conservatives? Viruses are hoaxes? Were Mers Sars HIV etc etc hoaxes? By whom. Are American conservatives simply people with blinders who see only what they are told to see? I do realize conservatives suffer from a weird Oedipal complex when it comes to their government, but come on people wake up. If you are a troll keep up the dumb work.

https://www.livescience.com/56598-de...-on-earth.html


"Mother Nature is the greatest bioterrorist of them all, with no financial limitations or ethical compunctions."

'Deadliest Enemy: Our War Against Killer Germs'

by Michael T. Osterholm, Mark Olshaker

[PostmodernProphet]

Read the REAL numbers and weep, limey cunt.

99,805 deaths
1,706,226 cases

5.8% death rate. Same as CDC

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/

both your source and the CDC now say that you are doing it wrong......I know you will never stop lying because you are hardcore lib'rul, but at least we now have proof of your lies.....

[Mason Melchizedek]

How many unconfirmed cases were/are there? How many had it and it wasn't much worse than the flu? How many had it and never shown any symptoms?
So when it comes to the accuracy of the "numbers," without knowing how many survived it without being tested, how could the "numbers" be accurate?

100'000 dead and counting

[PostmodernProphet]

^ Not a credible link.

do you like CNN better?.....
https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/22/healt...ths/index.html

probably you would, because even though they reported the same statement from the CDC, they found also an expert who they could say thought it might not be true......

[PostmodernProphet]

Hey, stupid fuck. The numbers I provide come from CDC and worldometer. Don’t like them? Tough shit. Go ahead and provide better numbers if you’d like.

But you won’t.

actually they already have......sourced from both the CDC and worldmeter, together with an accurate explanation of your error.........

[PostmodernProphet]

Can anyone explain why the deaths of fellow Americans from a virus is a hoax to right wing conservatives?

easy enough.....the hoax isn't the virus and never has been (claiming it was is just another part of your hoax).......the hoax was the uproar the left caused ABOUT the virus, including demanding the entire economy of the world be shut down to stop it.......the hoax is the demmycrats using the virus as another way to attempt to bring down Trump......the hoax is your continued effort to keep the world on shut down until the election is over.......

the evidence?.......you linked to the 12 deadliest viruses on earth.......none of them caused a total shutdown of the world's economy.......because of your hoax, this one did......

[Cypress]

It's better than you'd think as CNN is being referenced as an original story. Any time you get a story styled like this it is questionable though. Let's call this type of story as fools news. Kind of like fools gold it's difficult to tell the difference unless you base it off the original. Just go to the CDC basically. They did throw down a link to CDC but only to a bit cherry-picked for this. The sad part is when they don't even get the gist of their own link. The whole tidbit about these numbers not standing up in places heavily affected.

Righty-o. Why go to a rightwing blog for climate science info, when legitimate, prestigious science sources like NASA are easily available?

The problem with partisan news aggregators like this one, Breitbart, raw story, Drudge, et al. is that they troll the interwebs for stories which fit their agenda, and ignore stories which don't. It is not professional journalism - which attempts to look at all the data, the weight of evidence, to try to get as close to the truth as possible.

[RB 60]

Hey, stupid fuck. The numbers I provide come from CDC and worldometer. Don’t like them? Tough shit. Go ahead and provide better numbers if you’d like.

But you won’t.

Dickhead! We know where those numbers come from. The point is, how many had the China virus and didn't know it? I didn't say I didn't like them, just that they aren't 100% accurate.
No one can provide 100% accurate numbers when it's unknown how many had it and didn't require a testing or hospitalization.

[RB 60]

100'000 dead and counting

Where will you be celebrating?