Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567
Results 91 to 97 of 97

Thread: "Trump sees a ‘rigged election’ ahead"

  1. #91 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    20,913
    Thanks
    1,067
    Thanked 5,761 Times in 4,510 Posts
    Groans
    297
    Groaned 185 Times in 181 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Concart View Post
    Apples and oranges. The North Carolina House race was systematic election fraud perpetrated by the Republican candidate, and not voter fraud.
    Systematic election fraud is what is most feared, especially using mail-in ballots, because it affects a greater number of votes. But even individual voter fraud is sometimes systematic fraud organized by those involved in administering the election (usually in heavily one-party precincts).

    Fraud attempting to influence the election outcome is equally harmful whether done by individuals or organized efforts.

  2. #92 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    22,864
    Thanks
    1,440
    Thanked 15,405 Times in 9,440 Posts
    Groans
    101
    Groaned 1,894 Times in 1,783 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    Systematic election fraud is what is most feared, especially using mail-in ballots, because it affects a greater number of votes. But even individual voter fraud is sometimes systematic fraud organized by those involved in administering the election (usually in heavily one-party precincts).

    Fraud attempting to influence the election outcome is equally harmful whether done by individuals or organized efforts.
    By definition that is not individual voter fraud. And what you describe is again basically non-existent. More legal voters are denied the right to vote due to voter ID laws than illegal voters prevented from voting. It isn't even close. Voter ID laws are intended to suppress the votes of minorities, poor people, and the elderly.

  3. #93 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    In my house
    Posts
    21,174
    Thanks
    3,418
    Thanked 7,931 Times in 5,908 Posts
    Groans
    9
    Groaned 444 Times in 424 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Concart View Post
    Do you have trouble reading a calendar? Do you know what year it is?
    Doesnt matter what year, dems fo it routinely this uh s just tge latest to come to justice.
    "Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything." Joseph Stalin
    The USA has lost WWIV to China with no other weapons but China Virus and some cash to buy democrats.

  4. #94 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    20,913
    Thanks
    1,067
    Thanked 5,761 Times in 4,510 Posts
    Groans
    297
    Groaned 185 Times in 181 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Concart View Post
    By definition that is not individual voter fraud. And what you describe is again basically non-existent. More legal voters are denied the right to vote due to voter ID laws than illegal voters prevented from voting. It isn't even close. Voter ID laws are intended to suppress the votes of minorities, poor people, and the elderly.
    My point was simply that individual voter fraud or systematic election fraud are equally as harmful. One may be less prevalent than the other, but they both seek to undermine the election.

    There have been very few cases of people being denied the vote because they didn't have an ID. And, those who couldn't vote qualified for the ID, they just didn't bother to get one. Even those people are allowed to vote provisionally in many states.

    We neither one know how many people were denied the vote because of ID compared to being prevented from voting illegally. I think both are very small. That election/voter fraud database showed more "voter impersonation" cases than I would have guessed, but the total is still very small.

    Regardless of the intention of Voter ID laws, they do not seem to be meeting that goal. Why would Republicans want to limit the votes of elderly--they are the most reliable Republican voters. Local news sources investigating Voter ID effects on election day found many precincts virtually ignoring the ID requirement and allowing people to vote.

    I think the 2018 election voter turnout disproved any voter suppression (or gerrymandering) claims preventing Democratic success. All they had to do was to turn out and vote.

  5. #95 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    22,864
    Thanks
    1,440
    Thanked 15,405 Times in 9,440 Posts
    Groans
    101
    Groaned 1,894 Times in 1,783 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    My point was simply that individual voter fraud or systematic election fraud are equally as harmful. One may be less prevalent than the other, but they both seek to undermine the election.

    There have been very few cases of people being denied the vote because they didn't have an ID. And, those who couldn't vote qualified for the ID, they just didn't bother to get one. Even those people are allowed to vote provisionally in many states.

    We neither one know how many people were denied the vote because of ID compared to being prevented from voting illegally. I think both are very small. That election/voter fraud database showed more "voter impersonation" cases than I would have guessed, but the total is still very small.

    Regardless of the intention of Voter ID laws, they do not seem to be meeting that goal. Why would Republicans want to limit the votes of elderly--they are the most reliable Republican voters. Local news sources investigating Voter ID effects on election day found many precincts virtually ignoring the ID requirement and allowing people to vote.

    I think the 2018 election voter turnout disproved any voter suppression (or gerrymandering) claims preventing Democratic success. All they had to do was to turn out and vote.
    We are mostly in agreement, actually. Where I would part with you is the impact of voter ID laws on suppressing the vote. I think there is a significant number of people who have difficulty getting the needed ID. I hope some studies are done on the impact. That being said, I agree that 2018 was demonstrative of what happens when democrats are motivated to vote.

  6. #96 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    22,864
    Thanks
    1,440
    Thanked 15,405 Times in 9,440 Posts
    Groans
    101
    Groaned 1,894 Times in 1,783 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Celticguy View Post
    Doesnt matter what year, dems fo it routinely this uh s just tge latest to come to justice.
    No, Dems don't 'do this routinely'. In fact the list that was provided of cases, which was really interesting, had just as many people who violated the law to vote for a Republican, at least in cases where the party affiliation was mentioned.

  7. #97 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    20,913
    Thanks
    1,067
    Thanked 5,761 Times in 4,510 Posts
    Groans
    297
    Groaned 185 Times in 181 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Concart View Post
    We are mostly in agreement, actually. Where I would part with you is the impact of voter ID laws on suppressing the vote. I think there is a significant number of people who have difficulty getting the needed ID. I hope some studies are done on the impact. That being said, I agree that 2018 was demonstrative of what happens when democrats are motivated to vote.
    I have done a lot of researching and have found no reporting of those turned away for no ID. Many states have numerous forms of ID. Texas has 7 acceptable forms of ID and anyone can get a free state ID. For all those over 65 or disabled they qualify for voting by mail where no Voter ID is needed, so that takes care of all elderly voters where mail-in ballots are more convenient for them.

    I did find one 90+ year-old veteran in the Houston paper who could not vote, but he was eligible for multiple types of ID. He just did not know about them and did not get one.

    I think a bigger issue is voter registration. As long as you check the U. S. citizen box they have to issue you the registration unless they have proof otherwise, and there is no real enforcement mechanism to check these.

    When people are sent a jury summons many say the are not eligible because they are not citizens; yet, they are registered voters. We have no information about the number of non-citizens who vote, but a Texas woman who was a legal resident was given six years for voting in the primary and general election.

    Before I retired from teaching I gave my students extra credit for getting a voter registration certificate. One summer two Chinese sisters presented me with their voter registration cards saying "we're not citizens, but..."

Similar Threads

  1. Trump's dangerous rhetoric on the election being "rigged"
    By Cancel 2020.1 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 10-27-2016, 12:41 PM
  2. Texas Officials Call Trump "Rigged Election" Talk BS!
    By zappasguitar in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-27-2016, 11:46 AM
  3. HUH??? Dems SUE GOP over Trump''s "election is rigged" complaint
    By Text Drivers are Killers in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-26-2016, 08:23 PM
  4. Trump's Racist "Rigged Election" Attack Is as Old as America
    By signalmankenneth in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-22-2016, 08:12 PM
  5. Obama Slams Trump's "Whining" About Rigged Election
    By signalmankenneth in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-18-2016, 04:31 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •