Liar, Liar

[ThatOwlWoman]

Just rain, not as much fun to swim. The pool is warm, cloudy but no rain s d 88% humidity! 90 degrees! Yikes

Hope you have an enjoyable day! Are you all able to get together again?

[Phantasmal]

Hope you have an enjoyable day! Are you all able to get together again?

Today, outside by the pool. We’re doing chicken and ribs, deviled eggs, shrimp ceviche, guacamole, baked beans and grilled corn. The last two I just taste.

[ThatOwlWoman]

Today, outside by the pool. We’re doing chicken and ribs, deviled eggs, shrimp ceviche, guacamole, baked beans and grilled corn. The last two I just taste.

Sounds wonderful!

[Doc Dutch]

I’d like to know how the high priced lawyer became involved! Was it pro bono and him hoping to get fame by bringing down Biden and it just didn’t pan out?

Good Morning, we’re doing Memorial Day today so we can do it outside.

Hope you have a great Memorial Day.

I have a very low opinion of "celebrity" lawyers...well, most lawyers.

[dukkha]

What a retard!!!! You claimed the two wiords are interchangeable when they are not.
Skeptical means to have doubts about something. Disputed means one openly denied something.

you retard part II. they aer close enough in meaning that you have to try to talk down her bests friends skepticism
If she isn't fully disputing it, she sure as hell has "grave doubts" -which would be the best term

You are either a semi-literate dumbass or a craven shill for the right.
I suspect equal measures of both.

more like you are such a worthless Dem partisan you can't understand Ford was unsupported in her testimony, with skepticism included by her friend.

As far as not being able to back up Ford's claim.... not having seen something with one's own eyes and therefor not being able to confirm or deny it happened, has nothing to do with skepticism or denial.

horseshit.
The friend is skeptical without having 1st hand knowledge means just that. This is wrong on your part

I am obviously light years ahead of you when it comes to logical, conceptual thinking and comprehension.

your logic is as bad as your inability to support your contention that no one disputed Fords claims

More lying Trumptard bullshit.

more garbage posts from yourself

Just because your scumbag ilk intentionally mischaracterize and twist the meanings of everything said by those who don't lick Trump's boots along side you, says nothing about us.

ROFL. the usual crap rant.
You are incapable of posting anything but rants

Your rank, blatant dishonesty does not make us guilty of hypocrisy.

"believe"!! HA HA HA HA -you fucking dullard

[Doc Dutch]

keep your ruminations to yourself -i am 100% disinterested in them

Then put me on ignore and stop posting stupid shit to me.

[Doc Dutch]

Today, outside by the pool. We’re doing chicken and ribs, deviled eggs, shrimp ceviche, guacamole, baked beans and grilled corn. The last two I just taste.

Great menu. I had to look up "shrimp ceviche".

[Doc Dutch]

Kavanaugh's friend Mark Judge wrote a book about those days and the antics of the group. It was available to read for free in the internet archive during the hearing so I read it. It was a damning portrait of how rich, entitled kids behaved. It doesn't show Kavanaugh in a good light. Strangely enough, Mark Judge refused to answer questions at Kavanaugh's hearing.

https://www.dailydot.com/wp-content/...ed-800x400.jpg

There's no doubt in my mind he was a party animal and lied about it under oath. I know he changed when he got married, but, IMO, it displays a man of weak character who can't fess up to youthful indiscretions. Even if there were crimes committed, and I do not believe any laws were broken except underage drinking, the statute of limitations has long past. So why lie?

[Althea]

For just one moment, look past the accusers in this comparison and look at the accused.

Which one's claims of innocence is more believable.... a career US Senator family man with a devoted wife and kids and a reputation as a decent, sober, solid guy or a young, spoiled rich brat college frat boy with a reputation for excessive drinking?

There is no comparison.

But as for the accusers, when you compare them, it's the same thing again. Reade is a proven liar. Biden staffers from back in the 90's dispute her claims. There is no history of dishonesty in Ford's past. Nobody disputed her claims against Kavanaugh, they just couldn't definitely attest to their accuracy.

Anyone who is anywhere above the level of mindless partisan hack understands all that and anyone with a speck of honesty agrees with it.

Unfortunately, you Trump suckers are too deep in the Trump tank to see reality.

Disgusting hypocrites.

Don't forget...there were numerous other Kananaugh accusers who were ignored by the FBI because the White House wouldn't allow an investigation.

[Althea]

I’d like to know how the high priced lawyer became involved! Was it pro bono and him hoping to get fame by bringing down Biden and it just didn’t pan out?

Good Morning, we’re doing Memorial Day today so we can do it outside.

His statement was pretty lame. Didn't give a reason for quitting, but just knows that she's not lying.

[Althea]

Kangaroo court is right. There was no effort made by the GOP to dig deep into the accusations, it was all a farce.

If I were inocent and in Kavanaugh's position, I wouldn't have been blubbering, sweating and slurping water over the accusations. I'd demand that every single person on Blasey's side be grilled under oath. Instead the FBI chose to disregard most of the people who wanted to come forward for her.

Under orders from the WH

"The supplemental FBI background investigation would be limited to current credible allegations against the nominee and must be completed no later than one week from today," the Senate Judiciary Committee said in a statement.

[Althea]

There's no doubt in my mind he was a party animal and lied about it under oath. I know he changed when he got married, but, IMO, it displays a man of weak character who can't fess up to youthful indiscretions. Even if there were crimes committed, and I do not believe any laws were broken except underage drinking, the statute of limitations has long past. So why lie?

Because it was a bad look for an aspiring SC judge.

[Doc Dutch]

Don't forget...there were numerous other Kananaugh accusers who were ignored by the FBI because the White House wouldn't allow an investigation.

Obviously there was WH interference, but let's be honest: this was only about Kavanaugh's fitness to be a Justice, never about any crimes if for no other reason than the statute of limitations. The FBI investigates crimes.

What's to stop someone from hiring private investigators to research Kavanaugh's party past? The other Justices can still impeach him if he's caught lying under oath.

[Doc Dutch]

Because it was a bad look for an aspiring SC judge.

Hence why I'm thinking "weak character" and unfit to be a Justice.

[Althea]

Obviously there was WH interference, but let's be honest: this was only about Kavanaugh's fitness to be a Justice, never about any crimes if for no other reason than the statute of limitations. The FBI investigates crimes.

What's to stop someone from hiring private investigators to research Kavanaugh's party past? The other Justices can still impeach him if he's caught lying under oath.

There was a rush to get him through. Nobody claimed it was about the law. In fact, aside from the attempted rape, the other allegations were more about drunken perversions than illegal acts.

But this 'trial' before the Senate is meant to discern his fitness for the seat.