Truth Detector (05-27-2020)
Truth Detector (05-27-2020)
Trump gets the boot in November 2020, and jail in 2021.
Democrat predictions are always wrong.
nyt hillary election.jpg
.
a.jpg
.
spoiler alert hillary wins.jpg
.
alarmist scaremongering.jpg
.
trump economy soars prediction.jpg
Truth Detector (05-27-2020)
TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..
De Oppresso Liber
artichoke (05-25-2020), Truth Detector (05-27-2020)
.This survey uses statistical weighting procedures to account for deviations in the survey sample from known population characteristics, which helps correct for differential survey participation and random variation in samples. The overall adult sample is weighted to recent Census data using a sample balancing procedure to match the demographic makeup of the population by region, gender, age, education and race.When including thedesign effect, the margin of sampling error for this study of registered voters is +/-3.3percentage points.
Earl (05-23-2020)
it's really not that hard to understand you fucking dummies.
It's called weighting.
Lets say you know the population is 500 democrats, 500 republicans.
You sample 50 people where 30 are democrat and 20 are republican. i.e. 60% democrat vs. 40% republican.
BUT - we know the population data is exactly 50/50, so what do we do if we are not a retard on JPP that doesn't understand basic stats?
We weight the responses accordingly. Thus every democrat answer is worth .8x and every republican answer is worth 1.25x and
This brings the sample into line with the known population
I'm pretty sure I learned this stuff in 4th grade.
AProudLefty (05-23-2020)
Earl (05-23-2020)
Earl (05-23-2020)
christiefan915 (05-23-2020)
I would say 'yes and no' to this. For demographics like age, gender, race, etc, there is a relatively fixed baseline. For party affiliation, that baseline changes and often changes dramatically over time. So in cases like this, they pollster may very well go with whatever breakdown the sample indicates. I know there is some kind of algorithm and likely a baseline they are working from as a starting point, but I think that type of demographic is less likely to be weighted to a static number.
MSM and their think tanks are direct branches of the DNC ministry of propaganda and need to be regulated as in kind campaign contributors.
AProudLefty (05-23-2020)
Bookmarks