Page 10 of 16 FirstFirst ... 67891011121314 ... LastLast
Results 136 to 150 of 228

Thread: Another fake Democrat poll exposed

  1. #136 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    20,614
    Thanks
    1,042
    Thanked 5,628 Times in 4,421 Posts
    Groans
    295
    Groaned 183 Times in 179 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Into the Night View Post
    Immigration is part of naturalization, dumbass. The Supreme Court does not have authority to interpret or change the Constitution.
    And neither do you by claiming immigration is part of naturalization when it clearly is not included. What is the evidence for your uninformed claim?

    "To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;"

    You are proving understanding the Constitution requires interpretation. You are interpreting naturalization to include immigration (but without evidence) and giving Congress a power not specifically delegated.

  2. #137 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,061
    Thanks
    30,257
    Thanked 12,847 Times in 11,441 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,356 Times in 1,342 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    And neither do you by claiming immigration is part of naturalization when it clearly is not included. What is the evidence for your uninformed claim?

    "To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;"

    You are proving understanding the Constitution requires interpretation. You are interpreting naturalization to include immigration (but without evidence) and giving Congress a power not specifically delegated.
    Immigration of part of naturalization in any country, dumbass.

  3. #138 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    20,614
    Thanks
    1,042
    Thanked 5,628 Times in 4,421 Posts
    Groans
    295
    Groaned 183 Times in 179 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Into the Night View Post
    Immigration of part of naturalization in any country, dumbass.
    But not in our Constitution. You've read the constitution of every country? Wow.

    You still give us no source for your interpretation.

    That must mean the right to privacy is part of the other rights in the 9th Amendment, and that the 14th due process clause applied most of the Bill of Rights to the states.

    Those are not in the Constitution, either, but if we can claim one is part of the other, you are doing the same thing the Supreme Court has been doing for years--interpreting the Constitution.

    That proves the words of the Constitution are not enough to interpret the meaning you are adding words and powers to the Constitution's specific language. Naturalization laws are separate from immigration laws.

    What you really mean is that you think the court's interpretation of the Constitution is wrong on almost all legal decisions and you do not accept current constitution law. You do not believe in the rule of law.

  4. #139 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,061
    Thanks
    30,257
    Thanked 12,847 Times in 11,441 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,356 Times in 1,342 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    But not in our Constitution. You've read the constitution of every country? Wow.
    Immigration of part of naturalization in any country, dumbass.
    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    You still give us no source for your interpretation.
    The two go hand in hand, dumbass. Go learn English.
    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    That must mean the right to privacy is part of the other rights in the 9th Amendment,
    What right to privacy?
    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    and that the 14th due process clause applied most of the Bill of Rights to the states.
    Nope. The 14th amendment changed nothing concerning that.
    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    Those are not in the Constitution, either, but if we can claim one is part of the other, you are doing the same thing the Supreme Court has been doing for years--interpreting the Constitution.
    No, YOU are putting things in there that aren't there...again. YOU are still attempting to change the Constitution.
    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    That proves the words of the Constitution are not enough to interpret the meaning you are adding words and powers to the Constitution's specific language. Naturalization laws are separate from immigration laws.
    Not possible. Go learn English.
    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    What you really mean is that you think the court's interpretation of the Constitution is wrong on almost all legal decisions and you do not accept current constitution law.
    The Court does not have authority to interpret or change the Constitution. Only the States do.
    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    You do not believe in the rule of law.
    Inversion fallacy. That is YOU. It is YOU that wants to create an oligarchy that is above the law.

  5. #140 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    20,614
    Thanks
    1,042
    Thanked 5,628 Times in 4,421 Posts
    Groans
    295
    Groaned 183 Times in 179 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Into the Night View Post
    What right to privacy?
    The one that goes hand in hand with the "other rights" of the 9th, freedom of assembly, search and seizure, quartering of troops, and self-incrimination.

    You know, like immigration and naturalization go hand in hand.

    Both are an interpretation of the Constitution from Into the Night and the Supreme Court; but, only one has the authority to make such interpretations.

  6. #141 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,061
    Thanks
    30,257
    Thanked 12,847 Times in 11,441 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,356 Times in 1,342 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    The one that goes hand in hand with the "other rights" of the 9th, freedom of assembly, search and seizure, quartering of troops, and self-incrimination.
    What right to privacy? Rights do not come from a piece of paper.
    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    You know, like immigration and naturalization go hand in hand.
    They do.
    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    Both are an interpretation of the Constitution
    No. They are English. Learn English. You only seem to know Liberal.
    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    from Into the Night and the Supreme Court; but, only one has the authority to make such interpretations.
    The Supreme Court does not have authority to interpret or change the Constitution.
    Only the States have that authority.

  7. #142 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    20,614
    Thanks
    1,042
    Thanked 5,628 Times in 4,421 Posts
    Groans
    295
    Groaned 183 Times in 179 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Into the Night View Post
    No. They are English. Learn English. You only seem to know Liberal.
    Liberal is giving the government power not contained in the Constitution but claiming it is there. Try looking up the terms naturalization and immigration. You will see they are two different concepts. Also, check into English common law on which many of our legal principles are based.

  8. #143 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,061
    Thanks
    30,257
    Thanked 12,847 Times in 11,441 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,356 Times in 1,342 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    Liberal is giving the government power not contained in the Constitution but claiming it is there.
    Okay, liberal.
    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    Try looking up the terms naturalization and immigration. You will see they are two different concepts. Also, check into English common law on which many of our legal principles are based.
    False authority fallacy. Learn English.

  9. #144 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    internet
    Posts
    39,189
    Thanks
    7,082
    Thanked 17,235 Times in 10,345 Posts
    Groans
    1,025
    Groaned 1,490 Times in 1,337 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arminius View Post
    I recently remembered being condescended to and lectured for my uncivilized ways when I noticed the gaping holes in the left's debunked pseudo-science polling propaganda, and told I was just too unsophisticated to comprehend the nuances of this obviously phony and rigged "ask 20 Democrats and 5 Republicans" methodology...only to be proven right AGAIN, while every arrogant Democrat snob who hurled insults ended up humiliating themselves again, just like in 2016.

    Democrats got their asses handed to them across the board throughout the House and Senate...pretty much the opposite of what all their "blue wave" polling bullshit claimed. So I wanted to go back through and highlight all the arrogant elitist morons on here who presumed to dismiss and belittle anyone who dared to use their brain and see through all the left's spoon-fed bullshit talking points for the second time around and see if they've learned not to lash out at people for being smarter than them yet.

    Here they are, from the following thread, posted back in May: Another fake Democrat poll exposed

















    How are Democrats always so wrong, but yet still so vicious, conceited, and bigoted toward anyone who debunks their now-thoroughly discredited nonsense?



    Why election polls were so wrong again in 2020
    I am not a liberal you dumbass and if you look at my posts it's talking about how weighting works in general which is 100% true


    ---

    Quote Originally Posted by Mott the Hoople View Post
    Grind is basically right
    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Grind’s got you beat by miles. He is very intelligent.

  10. #145 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    10,720
    Thanks
    1,623
    Thanked 4,770 Times in 3,312 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 166 Times in 157 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BRUTALITOPS View Post
    I am not a liberal you dumbass and if you look at my posts it's talking about how weighting works in general which is 100% true
    Hence your bullshit pseudo-science being proven so wrong...again.



  11. The Following User Says Thank You to artichoke For This Post:

    Into the Night (11-20-2020)

  12. #146 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    Posts
    2,213
    Thanks
    420
    Thanked 568 Times in 454 Posts
    Groans
    18
    Groaned 77 Times in 72 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Polls are fake.

  13. #147 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    internet
    Posts
    39,189
    Thanks
    7,082
    Thanked 17,235 Times in 10,345 Posts
    Groans
    1,025
    Groaned 1,490 Times in 1,337 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arminius View Post


    Hence your bullshit pseudo-science being proven so wrong...again.


    weighting wasn't proven wrong bro


    ---

    Quote Originally Posted by Mott the Hoople View Post
    Grind is basically right
    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Grind’s got you beat by miles. He is very intelligent.

  14. #148 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    10,720
    Thanks
    1,623
    Thanked 4,770 Times in 3,312 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 166 Times in 157 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BRUTALITOPS View Post
    weighting wasn't proven wrong bro
    Hence the "blue wave" never happening...just like Hillary's 92% chance of winning in 2016.

    Frank Luntz urges pollsters to seek new profession after Trump outperforms polls: 'Sell real estate'

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to artichoke For This Post:

    Into the Night (11-20-2020)

  16. #149 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    28,330
    Thanks
    3,822
    Thanked 11,954 Times in 8,233 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 2,669 Times in 2,475 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Into the Night View Post
    The Supreme Court does not have authority to interpret...the Constitution.
    Ever since Marbury v. Madison in 1803, it has had that authority. It is very much part of our system that it has that authority.

  17. #150 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,061
    Thanks
    30,257
    Thanked 12,847 Times in 11,441 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,356 Times in 1,342 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BRUTALITOPS View Post
    I am not a liberal you dumbass and if you look at my posts it's talking about how weighting works in general which is 100% true
    Math error. Failure to use raw data. Failure to publish raw data. Failure to select by randN. Failure to normalize by paired randR. Failure to declare and justify variance. Failure to calculate margin of error value. You cannot use cooked data in statistucal math.
    "The atmosphere is among the factors that determines the Earth's atmosphere." --ZenMode
    "Donald has failed in almost every endeavor he has attempted. " --floridafan
    "Abortion is not a moral issue. " --BidenPresident
    "Propaganda can also be factual." --Flash
    "Even after being vaccinated, you shed virus particles." --Jerome
    "no slavery is forcing another into labor" -archives
    "Evs are much safer from fires" -- Nordberg
    "Abortion has killed no one." -- LurchAddams

Similar Threads

  1. Fake News Exposed
    By ThatOwlWoman in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 09-15-2018, 07:34 AM
  2. 'Israel's' fake propaganda videos exposed.
    By moon in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-17-2018, 04:20 PM
  3. 126 million exposed to fake russain created news
    By evince in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 12-17-2017, 04:33 PM
  4. Another Trump victory; FAKE media exposed.
    By Truth Detector in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-01-2017, 04:50 PM
  5. Petition for Second Referendum Exposed As Fake
    By Seahawk in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 06-28-2016, 05:13 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •