Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 51 of 51

Thread: One People, One State, One Purpose

  1. #46 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    16
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PoliTalker View Post
    Hello Sovereigntist,

    First of all, it would be nearly impossible for me to even be moved enough to read the 119 page proposal because I do not think a world government is possible.

    Secondly, if our Constitution is not working, what could possibly be better?

    The Constitution is so beautiful, if that isn't working then what could?
    Greetings PoliTalker, let me begin by saying that I do agree with you that the Constitution is beautiful in its own right. Proof of this is that it is one of the only democratic systems which has withstood the test of time. The problem, however, is that over the years certain parts of it (like the electoral system) have become increasingly corrupt. The Constitution was not created with political parties or corporate entities in mind. George Washington warned us many times that the creation of political parties would only lead to a divided government—something which is clearly evident today. The Constitution works, but political parties are deliberately trying to destroy it. Sovereignty addresses this issue by demanding the dissolution of all political parties and by creating a system that will ensure politicians will be held accountable for their actions.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Sovereigntist For This Post:

    PoliTalker (05-26-2020)

  3. #47 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    71,662
    Thanks
    6,591
    Thanked 12,126 Times in 9,657 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 503 Times in 476 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sovereigntist View Post
    Greetings PoliTalker, let me begin by saying that I do agree with you that the Constitution is beautiful in its own right. Proof of this is that it is one of the only democratic systems which has withstood the test of time. The problem, however, is that over the years certain parts of it (like the electoral system) have become increasingly corrupt. The Constitution was not created with political parties or corporate entities in mind. George Washington warned us many times that the creation of political parties would only lead to a divided government—something which is clearly evident today. The Constitution works, but political parties are deliberately trying to destroy it. Sovereignty addresses this issue by demanding the dissolution of all political parties and by creating a system that will ensure politicians will be held accountable for their actions.
    I think removing the hegemony of two parties is definitely good. but a multiplicity of parties like europe is more practical. no party = one party. like ccp.

  4. #48 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    34,430
    Thanks
    23,941
    Thanked 19,095 Times in 13,072 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 5,908 Times in 5,169 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Hello Sovereigntist,

    Quote Originally Posted by Sovereigntist View Post
    Greetings PoliTalker, let me begin by saying that I do agree with you that the Constitution is beautiful in its own right. Proof of this is that it is one of the only democratic systems which has withstood the test of time. The problem, however, is that over the years certain parts of it (like the electoral system) have become increasingly corrupt. The Constitution was not created with political parties or corporate entities in mind. George Washington warned us many times that the creation of political parties would only lead to a divided government—something which is clearly evident today. The Constitution works, but political parties are deliberately trying to destroy it. Sovereignty addresses this issue by demanding the dissolution of all political parties and by creating a system that will ensure politicians will be held accountable for their actions.
    It all sounds fine and well but it is essentially a pipe dream. It relies upon people with common sense recognizing the problem and then falling mostly into agreement on some basic concepts. I don't see that happening. The party divisions will refuse to see anything which is not cast in the light of the party power struggle.

    The way to deal with the corruption is to deal with the corruption.

    That is already in progress. It is a process which is time-honored, but it takes time. It is not a solution which can simply be agreed upon and enacted overnight, but something which practically changes the system from within the system. It has to happen slowly but surely.

    It can be laid out in simple terms but to be completed, it must wait for people to be exposed to it and let it sink in that this idea preserves the party power struggle but sets new rules which prevent corruption. Many in both parties like the corruption. They will be reluctant to give it up. But they will because of a simple fact: That fact is this idea forces them to take a public position on corruption itself. Are they for corruption or against it? Since neither party, nor any individual within eaither party wishes to take a public position in favor of corruption, they will not fight this one proposal, which is non-partisan.

    Here it is:




    Anti-Corruption Act
    Last edited by PoliTalker; 05-26-2020 at 06:00 AM.
    Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.

  5. #49 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    34,430
    Thanks
    23,941
    Thanked 19,095 Times in 13,072 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 5,908 Times in 5,169 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    How to fix corruption:

    Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.

  6. #50 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    71,662
    Thanks
    6,591
    Thanked 12,126 Times in 9,657 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 503 Times in 476 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PoliTalker View Post
    How to fix corruption:

    the only solution is to devolve the largesse of government, so it's not worth trying to buy.

  7. #51 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    71,662
    Thanks
    6,591
    Thanked 12,126 Times in 9,657 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 503 Times in 476 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    the concept of any human institution being totally pure is a dangerous lie.

    schemes like this are just the upper echelons of the hidden hand betraying their cultivated bourgeoisie, and reinstating their feudalism.

    surveillance state will make their dominion absolute.

    this is the book within the the book from 1984.

    don't fall for this horseshit.

Similar Threads

  1. The deep state = the American people
    By evince in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 10-24-2019, 08:49 AM
  2. People of the State of New York
    By Tkaffen in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 10-02-2018, 11:49 AM
  3. the purpose of the 2nd Amendment
    By SmarterthanYou in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 03-31-2016, 03:21 PM
  4. Purpose of economies
    By Hermes Thoth in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-17-2010, 05:32 AM
  5. Does he do this on purpose?
    By FUCK THE POLICE in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 03-21-2008, 08:21 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •