In 2016, during the campaign, someone stole information from the Democratic National Committee’s email server. It wound up online and embarrassed Hillary Clinton. Democrats quickly blamed the theft on Russian agents, and therefore Donald Trump, who was supposedly the pawn of the Russians.
In fact, there was never real evidence that that actually happened.
The Democratic National Committee, as you may have read, never allowed federal investigators to inspect their email servers. That’s odd behavior for people who claim to be the victims of foreign espionage.
Instead, the party’s servers were inspected by a third-party company called CrowdStrike.
Adam Schiff’s committee interviewed the CEO of CrowdStrike, Shawn Henry. Schiff questioned Henry directly. He asked if Henry knew when the Russians had stolen the data from the DNC servers.
Henry’s reply, which we’re seeing for the first time is this:Adam Schiff heard those words directly, he heard them from the one person who would know for certain.“As it relates to the DNC, we have indicators that data was exfiltrated. We did not have concrete evidence.” Later, Henry admitted he only had only “circumstantial evidence” that the Russians were involved at all.
Schiff knew there was nothing substantial at the core of the Russian collusion story. At the very center, it was hollow, it was a sham. But Schiff never suggested this in public. Instead, he did the opposite. He spent years on television telling you it was totally real, shut up.
Here are comments Schiff made on different occasions on several TV programs:
*“So there’s clear evidence on the issue of collusion and this adds to that body of evidence.”
*“There’s ample evidence of collusion in plain sight and that is true.”
*“You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion. Pretty compelling evidence.”
*“And there is significant evidence of collusion.”
*“This is ample evidence and indeed there is of collusion of people in the Trump campaign with the Russians.”
*“I think there’s plenty of evidence of collusion or conspiracy.”
*“All of this is evidence of collusion.”
*“There is significant evidence of collusion between the campaign and Russia.”
In case you weren’t counting during that montage, Adam Schiff said “evidence” nine times in that clip. Every single time was a lie. If you were following this closely at the time, you might have suspected this. Schiff never produced any of this so-called evidence. He just asserted its existence.
After a while, we noticed. We confronted Schiff about it when he came on this show. He never answered our question. Instead, he accused us of treason. Here is part of our exchange:
CARLSON Look right into the camera and say, "I know for a fact the government of Vladimir Putin was behind the hacks of John Podesta's email."
SCHIFF: Absolutely, the government of Vladimir Putin was behind the hacks of our institution and the dumping of information –
CARLSON: Of John Podesta's e-mail.
SCHIFF: Not only in the United States, but also in Europe –
CARLSON: OK, you're not – you know what? You're dodging.
SCHIFF: And Tucker you are –
CARLSON: Look and say, "I know they did John Podesta's e-mail. They hacked this."
SCHIFF: And I think that Ronald Reagan would be rolling over his grave.
CARLSON: You can't – Ronald Reagan.
SCHIFF: You're carrying water for the Kremlin –
CARLSON: I am not carrying water for – you're making – look, you're a sitting member of Congress on the Intel Committee ...
SCHIFF: Would you -- and the president-elect …
CARLSON: ... on the Intel Committee and you can't say they hacked –
SCHIFF: You're going to have to move your show to Russian television.
Adam Schiff is a sociopath. He will do or say anything to achieve power. He is unfit to hold office. He should resign. And not just Adam Schiff. The entire apparatus of official Washington has been exposed by these transcripts, as well as by the documents just released in the Michael Flynn case.
In November 2019, government attorney Brandon Van Grack defended the FBI’s decision to interrogate Flynn at the White House with no lawyer.
Van Grack said:In that same filing, Van Grack wrote that Flynn’s phone call with the Russian ambassador was of paramount importance.“The FBI was engaged in a legitimate and significant investigation into whether individuals associated with the campaign of then-candidate Donald J. Trump were coordinating with the Russian government."according to Van Grack.“It was imperative that the FBI determine whether and why such communications with the Russian ambassador had occurred,”
Both of those statements from Van Grack, we now know conclusively, are lies. In its filing this week, the Justice Department revealed that in early January, the FBI had already known there was “no derogatory information” tying Michael Flynn to the Russian government.
Nor did they need to know whether Flynn had spoken with Russian Ambassador to the U.S. Sergey Kislyak.
They knew he had. They were listening. They had a word-for-word transcript of the call.
In other words, Van Grack was lying in his filing. This is not only of importance to Donald Trump. This is important to every American, because things fall apart when high-level officials do things like this for political reasons. There’s a reason nobody trusts the government anymore.
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tuck...-should-resign
Bookmarks