Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Ask The Right Questions

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default Ask The Right Questions

    Bottom line: United Nations scum will never surrender their newfound absolute authority to control behavior, not only here but worldwide. Absolute authority is now in the hands of a few thousand elected officials starting with President Trump and going down to governors, mayors, local bureaucrats, and police departments. Naturally, the SCOTUS relish every coronavirus dictate.

    New World Order filth were floored when they saw how many Americans could be frightened into surrendering their liberty on nothing more than the word of medical industry parasites hustling TRILLIONS of tax dollars. Had the scum known how it easy it is they would have done it decades ago.

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...44#post3560244

    Move the cursor to 4:20 and listen to Tucker Carlson’s questions:

    VIDEO

    https://video.foxnews.com/v/61486966...#sp=show-clips

    Neither Carlson nor any media mouth will ask the right questions. The answers are verboten. I know the answers.

    There are many branches of one conspiracy aimed at achieving the same goal. The federal government’s unconstitutional control of education is one. Taking on every conspiracy in detail fills volumes. Communist attacks on private property alone would fill a library.


    The theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property. Karl Marx (1818 – 1883) and Friedrich Engels (1820 – 1895)

    I want to put together a few observations on one branch of the conspiracy that has been evolving from the root problem.

    Governments ordering their citizens how to behave began with the first government. To be precise the same personality types went into every government throughout history.

    Americans do not have to go back that far to see the steps the scum in our federal government take to impose the tax collector’s morality on a free people. Basically, YOU MUST NOT morphed into DO AS I TELL YOU TO DO.


    House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said that the individual health insurance mandates included in every health reform bill, which require Americans to have insurance, were “like paying taxes.” He added that Congress has “broad authority” to force Americans to purchase other things as well, so long as it was trying to promote “the general welfare.”

    The Congressional Budget Office, however, has stated in the past that a mandate forcing Americans to buy health insurance would be an “unprecedented form of federal action,” and that the “government has never required people to buy any good or service as a condition of lawful residence in the United States.”

    Hoyer Says Constitution’s ‘General Welfare’ Clause Empowers Congress to Order Americans to Buy Health Insurance
    October 21, 2009
    By Matt COVER

    http://cnsnews.com/news/article/hoye...-americans-buy

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...94#post3547294

    Steny Hoyer overturning James Madison makes him the most arrogant parasite that was ever elected to Congress:


    With respect to the two words ‘general welfare,’ I have always regarded them as qualified by the detail of powers connected with them. To take them in a literal and unlimited sense would be a metamorphosis of the Constitution into a character which there is a host of proofs was not contemplated by its creators. James Madison

    If Congress can do whatever in their discretion can be done by money, and will promote the general welfare, the government is no longer a limited one possessing enumerated powers, but an indefinite one subject to particular exceptions. James Madison, “Letter to Edmund Pendleton,”

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...72#post3561972

    When Hoyer laid his finger on the General Welfare clause he invited millions of parasites from every corner of the world to come here and feed at the public trough. Even worse, Hoyers abuse of the General Welfare clause is only the beginning of his destruction.

    The step taken by Steny Hoyer was essential in advancing the conspiracy’s objectives. Note that in the past month or so the coronavirus conspiracy was an extension of Hoyer’s contribution to enslaving a free people when every elected official and local bureaucrats in state and local governments usurped an unconstitutional privilege for the General Welfare. Not one law was passed to give them that privilege, nor has one law been passed to take it away. It is a privilege government personalty types will never relinquish anymore than scum like Hoyer, Pelosi, Schumer and their kind will renounce their definition of the General Welfare clause.

    NOTE: Allowing involuntary servitude followed Obamacare:


    No plaintiff’s lawyer ever fought his client’s case on the grounds of involuntary servitude:

    VIII Amendment

    Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

    XIII Amendment

    Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

    Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...41#post2782041

    Parenthetically, our Founders created individual liberties. Every previous government had only to prevent liberty from taking root. From the beginning the parasites that infiltrated the federal government had to eliminate existing individual Rights. Hence, the federal government’s longest running conspiracy against the American people concentrated on eliminating the Right to work for one’s self. In little more than a century the XVI Amendment abolished the Right to keep the wealth an individual earned.

    The first step in the conspiracy against individual liberties was engineered by Roman Catholic priests shortly after the original Bill of Rights was ratified:


    In 1813 the Roman Catholic Church shot holes in the Constitution when priests were given the confessional-privilege. In plain English, priests got the opening they needed to legitimate coerced charity incrementally. (Doctors, lawyers, journalists, and psychiatrists followed priests with similar protections codified by politicians.)

    Priests have been a pestilence infecting mankind from the day money was invented; so I would take the privilege away from priests first. If anyone is dumb enough to tell priests anything they do not deserve protection.

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...he-4th-Of-July

    In simple terms, a special privilege given to specific personalty types loyal to the government logically takes a Right away from everybody else.

    Finally, defenders of the U.S. Constitution on the High Court will never rule against dirty little moralists stuffing themselves with income tax dollars:


    Supreme Court justices are creatures of the federal government; so predicting the outcome of Supreme Court cases involving tax dollars, and/or Wall Street’s income, is a walk in the park. No Supreme Court will ever decide to reduce or eliminate federal government revenues. In short: Repealing the ACA did not stand a chance when it got to the High Court.

    Repealing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 was a snap for most Americans BEFORE Chief Justice John Roberts said it was a constitutional tax.

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...78#post2761678
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    Governments ordering their citizens how to behave began with the first government. To be precise the same personality types went into every government throughout history.
    Note that cops are NOT enforcing a law against criminals. They are obeying the governor’s orders:


    The police said that they will not be storming churches that violate the governor’s stay-at-home order, but that charges could come “down the line.”

    Gov. J.B. Pritzker’s stay-at-home order prohibits all gatherings of ten people or more through April 30, including church services.

    Illinois State Police Director Brendan Kelly announced the potential for charges on Thursday.

    Illinois State Police Warn Worshippers Who Attend Church On Easter Sunday Could Face Charges, Including ‘Reckless Conduct’
    By Cassandra Fairbanks
    Published April 11, 2020 at 4:59pm

    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...kless-conduct/

    It follows that cops on the front line will obey Brendan Kelly’ orders.

    p.s. I will be very surprised if any Michigan court allows this recall to see the light of day:


    Over 80,000 Sign Online Petition Demanding Recall of Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer
    by Kyle Olson
    11 Apr 2020

    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...tchen-whitmer/
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Hooterville by the sea
    Posts
    23,202
    Thanks
    6,237
    Thanked 16,467 Times in 11,530 Posts
    Groans
    1,235
    Groaned 513 Times in 483 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default


  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Eagle_Eye For This Post:

    Frank Apisa (04-12-2020), Tranquillus in Exile (04-12-2020)

  5. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Software billionaire Bill Gates, who previously has advocated the reduction of the human population through the use of vaccines, and his wife Melinda marked the 100th year since the First International Eugenics Congress in London with a “family planning” summit with abortionists and the United Nations.

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...94#post3537794


    XXXXX


    Fauci is a stalwart enthusiast of “patentable” vaccines, skilled in attracting massive government funding for vaccines that either never materialize or are spectacularly ineffective or unsafe.

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...79#post3565679

    Somebody better ask Gates and Fauci the right question about their hidden agendas:

    Who elected these guys so they could sink so America’s freedoms?

    That’s right: nobody.

    Gates and Fauci: Unelected destroyers of freedom
    By Cheryl K. Chumley
    The Washington Times
    Saturday, April 11, 2020

    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...stroyers-free/

    Then there is this:

    Coronavirus Crisis: Refugee Agencies Lobby for Mass Immigration to U.S.
    by John Binder
    11 Apr 2020

    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...ration-to-u-s/

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    When Hoyer laid his finger on the General Welfare clause he invited millions of parasites from every corner of the world to come here and feed at the public trough.
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  6. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Central New Jersey
    Posts
    23,227
    Thanks
    13,487
    Thanked 12,167 Times in 7,619 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,051 Times in 998 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eagle-Eye View Post
    Allow me to take this opportunity to agree with you enthusiastically, EE.

    You hit the nail squarely on its head.
    ON HIS WORST DAY, JOE BIDEN IS A BETTER PRESIDENT THAN TRUMP WAS ON HIS BEST DAY!

  7. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Hooterville by the sea
    Posts
    23,202
    Thanks
    6,237
    Thanked 16,467 Times in 11,530 Posts
    Groans
    1,235
    Groaned 513 Times in 483 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Apisa View Post
    Allow me to take this opportunity to agree with you enthusiastically, EE.

    You hit the nail squarely on its head.
    Happy Easter Frank stay safe.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Eagle_Eye For This Post:

    Frank Apisa (04-12-2020)

  9. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Central New Jersey
    Posts
    23,227
    Thanks
    13,487
    Thanked 12,167 Times in 7,619 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,051 Times in 998 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eagle-Eye View Post
    Happy Easter Frank stay safe.
    Same back at you, EE...and to everyone else in the forum.
    ON HIS WORST DAY, JOE BIDEN IS A BETTER PRESIDENT THAN TRUMP WAS ON HIS BEST DAY!

  10. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Apisa View Post
    Allow me to take this opportunity to agree with you enthusiastically, EE.

    You hit the nail squarely on its head.
    To Frank Apisa: I see that you survived the fall:




    Everyone Jumps Off Bridge After New Government Order Telling Everyone To Jump Off Bridge
    April 3rd, 2020

    https://babylonbee.com/news/governme...p-off-a-bridge
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  11. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    Governments ordering their citizens how to behave began with the first government.
    Judge Napolitano found a bit of his lost luster:

    VIDEO

    https://video.foxnews.com/v/61491738...#sp=show-clips
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  12. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Associate Justice Thomas answers the right questions on abortion:


    In a scathing rebuke Monday of a ruling supported by Chief Justice Roberts against abortion restrictions, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that the landmark Roe v. Wade ruling has no constitutional basis and must be overruled.

    Thomas issued the dissent in the Supreme Court's 5-4 decision in June Medical Services v. Russo to strike down a Louisiana law. The law requires that individuals who perform abortions at clinics have admitting privileges in a nearby hospital.

    The majority found the law unconstitutional, concluding it places an undue burden on women seeking abortions.

    But in his 20-page dissent, Thomas called the right to an abortion an erroneous precedent grounded in a "legal fiction."


    "This Court created the right to abortion based on an amorphous, unwritten right to privacy, which it grounded in the 'legal fiction' of substantive due process," Thomas wrote. "As the origins of this jurisprudence readily demonstrate, the putative right to abortion is a creation that should be undone."

    Thomas pointed out that the Supreme Court in the 1965 Griswold v. Connecticut case acknowledged the Constitution did not protect a right to privacy. Instead, the court "explained that this right could be found in the 'penumbras' of five different Amendments to the Constitution — the First, Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Ninth."

    "Rather than explain what free speech or the quartering of troops had to do with contraception, the Court simply declared that these rights had created 'zones of privacy' with their 'penumbras,' which were formed by emanations from those guarantees that help give them life and substance," Thomas wrote.

    "This reasoning is as mystifying as it is baseless."

    Thomas said "the idea that the Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment understood the Due Process Clause to protect a right to abortion is farcical."

    He pointed out that in 1868, when the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified, a majority of the states and numerous territories had laws that limited, and in many cases nearly prohibited, abortion.

    "It would no doubt shock the public at that time to learn that one of the new constitutional Amendments contained hidden within the interstices of its text a right to abortion," Thomas wrote. "The fact that it took this Court over a century to find that right all but proves that it was more than hidden — it simply was not (and is not) there."

    Thomas criticized Roberts for claiming to adhere to stare decisis, or precedent. It's the legal doctrine that gives deference to previous decisions.

    Thomas argued the justices exceed their constitutional authority whenever they "apply demonstrably erroneous precedent instead of the relevant law’s text."

    "Because we can reconcile neither Roe nor its progeny with the text of our Constitution, those decisions should be overruled," Thomas asserted. "Because we lack jurisdiction and our abortion jurisprudence finds no basis in the Constitution, I respectfully dissent."


    Clarence Thomas erupts on his own chief justice
    By WND Staff
    Published June 29, 2020 at 7:42pm

    https://www.wnd.com/2020/06/clarence...chief-justice/

    NOTE: The court ruled that it was unconstitutional to pay for abortion with tax dollars, yet Planned Parenthood still receives tax dollars to subsidize its baby body parts business.

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    Repealing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 was a snap for most Americans BEFORE Chief Justice John Roberts said it was a constitutional tax.

    Chief Justice John Roberts knew damn well he was funding abortions when he ruled that Obamacare was a constitutional tax. I cannot wait to hear Justice Thomas’ dissent when Roberts and his his fellow Democrats on the court once again uphold the ACA:


    WASHINGTON, DC - The Supreme Court has decided to hear a case that could result in throwing out Obamacare, the government-run health care program that funds killing babies in abortions.

    The nation’s highest court will take up a legal challenge to Obamacare and has agreed to hear the case after its new term begins in October. That means President Trump or a pro-abortion Democrat will oversee what happens next should the Supreme Court overturn the government-run program.


    Monday, March 2, 2020
    Life News
    Supreme Court Will Hear Case That Could Result in Ending Obamacare, Which Funds Abortions
    By Steven Ertelt

    https://www.hydesmith.senate.gov/sup...unds-abortions
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

Similar Threads

  1. 2 questions
    By USFREEDOM911 in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 10-05-2018, 08:02 AM
  2. Questions I have to ask
    By Legion in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 08-05-2018, 10:35 AM
  3. A few questions for the right
    By jbander in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-27-2018, 09:34 PM
  4. ASK ME QUESTIONS
    By BRUTALITOPS in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 103
    Last Post: 02-04-2010, 09:24 AM
  5. 20 Questions.....
    By CanadianKid in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-10-2008, 10:17 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •