Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Trump Says He'll IGNORE Oversight Rules Of Corporate Bailout

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    9,164
    Thanks
    3,635
    Thanked 6,593 Times in 4,192 Posts
    Groans
    130
    Groaned 1,203 Times in 1,060 Posts

    Default Trump Says He'll IGNORE Oversight Rules Of Corporate Bailout



    Yes, congrats Democrats...you fell for it again! Or did you do it on purpose? More looting of the treasury and corporate Socialism.
    BLUEXIT
    A Modest Proposal For Separating Blue States From Red

    Dear Red-State Trump Voter,
    Let’s face it, guys: We’re done.


    It is a tragedy that so much of the work that so many men and women toiled at for so long to make this a better country, and a better world, has been thrown away, leaving us all in such needless peril.

    This is why our separation in all but name is necessary.


    https://newrepublic.com/article/1409...mp-red-america

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,218
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,217 Times in 13,952 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,053 Times in 2,848 Posts

    Default

    The question becomes if Trump will be allowed to do such, he signed the bill which included the oversight and then two hours later filed an addendum saying he didn't feel the to be appointed IG had the authority to overrule the President's decision to withhold reports from Congress.

    Which basically means Trump never had any intent of following the law, however, because he did sign it into law, it ain't that easy for him to say now he isn't going to follow it, there will be legal ramifications. Surely he did it all under billy barr's advice, the Executive Privilege bullshit, knowing if nothing else it could be tied up in the Courts endlessly

    Problem is who Trump doles out the money to, remember, everything with him is quid pro quo, and also what Trump businesses will get and how, the last thing he wants is for anyone to start looking into every and any gift like the right did with Obama back in the "porkulus" stimulus

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    9,164
    Thanks
    3,635
    Thanked 6,593 Times in 4,192 Posts
    Groans
    130
    Groaned 1,203 Times in 1,060 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    The question becomes if Trump will be allowed to do such, he signed the bill which included the oversight and then two hours later filed an addendum saying he didn't feel the to be appointed IG had the authority to overrule the President's decision to withhold reports from Congress.

    Which basically means Trump never had any intent of following the law, however, because he did sign it into law, it ain't that easy for him to say now he isn't going to follow it, there will be legal ramifications. Surely he did it all under billy barr's advice, the Executive Privilege bullshit, knowing if nothing else it could be tied up in the Courts endlessly

    Problem is who Trump doles out the money to, remember, everything with him is quid pro quo, and also what Trump businesses will get and how, the last thing he wants is for anyone to start looking into every and any gift like the right did with Obama back in the "porkulus" stimulus
    I just hope he drops dead soon. I'm sick of looking at him, hearing him and hearing about him when it's so damned unavoidable.
    BLUEXIT
    A Modest Proposal For Separating Blue States From Red

    Dear Red-State Trump Voter,
    Let’s face it, guys: We’re done.


    It is a tragedy that so much of the work that so many men and women toiled at for so long to make this a better country, and a better world, has been thrown away, leaving us all in such needless peril.

    This is why our separation in all but name is necessary.


    https://newrepublic.com/article/1409...mp-red-america

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    36,821
    Thanks
    16,886
    Thanked 21,030 Times in 14,526 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,387 Times in 1,305 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    The question becomes if Trump will be allowed to do such, he signed the bill which included the oversight and then two hours later filed an addendum saying he didn't feel the to be appointed IG had the authority to overrule the President's decision to withhold reports from Congress.

    Which basically means Trump never had any intent of following the law, however, because he did sign it into law, it ain't that easy for him to say now he isn't going to follow it, there will be legal ramifications. Surely he did it all under billy barr's advice, the Executive Privilege bullshit, knowing if nothing else it could be tied up in the Courts endlessly

    Problem is who Trump doles out the money to, remember, everything with him is quid pro quo, and also what Trump businesses will get and how, the last thing he wants is for anyone to start looking into every and any gift like the right did with Obama back in the "porkulus" stimulus
    I'll bet I know. Notice how the 'My Pillow' guy, along with every other business representative in the Rose Garden yesterday hailed trump's leadership before their comments?

    I'm sure they'll all get a nice chunk of change.
    Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.

Similar Threads

  1. Idiot Dims ignore social distancing rules to watch a ship
    By volsrock in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-30-2020, 05:44 PM
  2. Grand Theft Bailout: Stimulus Bill Is Corporate Oligarchy
    By Cinnabar in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-25-2020, 03:20 PM
  3. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 12-30-2019, 11:13 AM
  4. Replies: 21
    Last Post: 10-04-2019, 02:58 PM
  5. Replies: 42
    Last Post: 01-10-2016, 02:52 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •