Am I the most-mentioned poster on JPP?

[Legion]

I think it's possible.

I just found 366 threads that mentioned me in their titles, and that doesn't include the thousands of threads that were lost in the Great Database Dump that erased over a year's worth of JPP history.

What do you suppose this means?

[Doc Dutch]

I think it's possible.

I just found 366 threads that mentioned me in their titles, and that doesn't include the thousands of threads that were lost in the Great Database Dump that erased over a year's worth of JPP history.

What do you suppose this means?

366 threads with Retarded Asshole in the title? Awesome!!! Gotta link to a few?

BTW, you forgot to ban dozens of members like you usually do on your threads. IMO, it's a pussy move to ban dozens of people from a thread. Gutless, cowardly shit, you know. Same for those sock puppet assholes.

[AProudLefty]

What does it mean when you keep thread banning the same posters over and over so you can hear yourself talk?

[Doc Dutch]

What does it mean when you keep thread banning the same posters over and over so you can hear yourself talk?

"Psycho jerkoff" springs to mind.

[archives]

I think it's possible.

I just found 366 threads that mentioned me in their titles, and that doesn't include the thousands of threads that were lost in the Great Database Dump that erased over a year's worth of JPP history.

What do you suppose this means?

Either because you got the most names, post to yourself the most, or are the Lloyd Christmas of the forum, I'm betting all three

[Legion]

Heh, heh.

[Cancel 2020.2]

I think it's possible.

I just found 366 threads that mentioned me in their titles, and that doesn't include the thousands of threads that were lost in the Great Database Dump that erased over a year's worth of JPP history.

What do you suppose this means?

You definitely ARE. You're obviously hitting a nerve and setting off the moronic liberal lunatics that post on here. Great work!

[Legion]

Either because you got the most names, post to yourself the most, or are the Lloyd Christmas of the forum, I'm betting all three

Think so, Anchovies?

Can you find 366 threads that mention you in their titles?

[AProudLefty]

You definitely ARE. You're obviously hitting a nerve and setting off the moronic liberal lunatics that post on here. Great work!

Nope retard, we are laughing at him. Poor guy doesn't realize it. And you got caught in his bait. So now I am laughing at you.

[Legion]

You definitely ARE. You're obviously hitting a nerve and setting off the moronic liberal lunatics that post on here. Great work!

Heh, heh.

[Cancel 2020.2]

Either because you got the most names, post to yourself the most, or are the Lloyd Christmas of the forum, I'm betting all three

He-he, YOU are one of the morons I mentioned in my previous post on this thread, Archie. Hilarious!

[Cancel 2020.2]

Nope retard, we are laughing at him. Poor guy doesn't realize it. And you got caught in his bait. So now I am laughing at you.

What's your I.Q. again, ya dim knuckleheaded Lefty?

[AProudLefty]

What's your I.Q. again, ya dim knuckleheaded Lefty?

145

[PostmodernProphet]

I think it's possible.

I just found 366 threads that mentioned me in their titles, and that doesn't include the thousands of threads that were lost in the Great Database Dump that erased over a year's worth of JPP history.

What do you suppose this means?

if you count all your socks you also have the most posts of any other poster on JPP.......so, it would only be logical......

[Legion]

if you count all your socks you also have the most posts of any other poster on JPP.......so, it would only be logical......

True, except my socks didn't count in the number of mentions I got in thread titles with this moniker alone.