Woman accuses pedophile Joe Biden of sexual assault

[artichoke]

[artichoke]

Is that really the best you can do, after being spanked, is to insult??

When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.

[artichoke]

Remember what Joe Biden said.

In 2018, for example, Biden was asked about whether he believed Anita Hill’s claims in the 90s that her then-boss Clarence Thomas sexually harassed her. Biden said he thought Hill “was telling the truth at the beginning.” He then spoke generally about women’s allegations.

“For a woman to come forward in the glaring lights of focus, nationally, you’ve got to start off with the presumption that at least the essence of what she’s talking about is real, whether or not she forgets facts, whether or not it’s been made worse or better over time. But nobody fails to understand that this is like jumping into a cauldron,” Biden told reporters.

But when Biden was accused by Tara Reade, Kate Bedingfield, Biden’s deputy campaign manager and communications director, called the allegations against Biden “false”.

The response from the Biden campaign is a clear contrast to the statements Biden has made over the past few decades, in which he insists women making sexual misconduct allegations must be believed.








https://www.dailywire.com/news/biden-says-we-must-believe-all-women-except-the-woman-who-accused-him

Oops.

Literally not smart enough to be president.

[Legion]

He's a senile pedophile who grabbed pussy?

[The Anonymous]

How brave, lobbing your insults from under a virtual paper bag.

Catlike reflex?

[Legion]

[Tranquillus in Exile]

Is there a statue of limitations?

[Legion]

[christiefan915]

If you hadn't JUST SAID you DO assume everyone is guilty until proven innocent, this might make sense.

Pants on fire. Again with the false dichotomy, you clowns just can't seem to quit logical fallacies.

[The Anonymous]

[artichoke]

Pants on fire. Again with the false dichotomy, you clowns just can't seem to quit logical fallacies.

Or you just can't comprehend that always presuming every woman is telling the truth IS claiming that all the accused are automatically guilty.

You being stupid isn't other people being dishonest.

Try again.

[christiefan915]

Or you just can't comprehend that always presuming every woman is telling the truth IS claiming that all the accused are automatically guilty.

You being stupid isn't other people being dishonest.

Try again.

You peppering your posts with false dichotomies is a reflection on Y O U, not me.

Take off the blinders already.

[artichoke]

You peppering your posts with false dichotomies is a reflection on Y O U, not me.

Take off the blinders already.

You incorrectly labeling it a "false dichotomy" to notice that your "believe all accusers" stance equals "believe all the accused are guilty" doesn't make it invalid.

That's just moronic on its face.

What else you got.