Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 61 to 75 of 75

Thread: Lindsey Graham announces investigation into Democrat-staged FBI coup attempt

  1. #61 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Delray Beach FL
    Posts
    114,996
    Thanks
    124,828
    Thanked 27,335 Times in 22,664 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 3,239 Times in 2,979 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Micawber View Post
    Laughing at this. A reprise of Trump's wholesale treason is the LAST fucking thing you dumbshits should do. So keep doing it.
    Trump's wholesale treason? You really are too much of a mental retard to comprehend how stupid this is.

    "When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."


    A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
    Author: Booker T. Washington



    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    Unless you just can't stand the idea of "ni**ers" teaching white kids.


    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Address the topic, not other posters.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Truth Detector For This Post:

    Earl (02-29-2020)

  3. #62 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Delray Beach FL
    Posts
    114,996
    Thanks
    124,828
    Thanked 27,335 Times in 22,664 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 3,239 Times in 2,979 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Crocodile View Post
    It's to keep the lemmings going.
    Buy a mirror if you want to see what a lemming looks like.
    "When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."


    A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
    Author: Booker T. Washington



    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    Unless you just can't stand the idea of "ni**ers" teaching white kids.


    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Address the topic, not other posters.

  4. #63 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,960
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,040 Times in 13,848 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arminius View Post
    Guess you missed the part where Democrats were caught doctoring the evidence for the FISA warrants and lying to a federal judge to illegally spy.



    When the FISA warrant was submitted, there is this thing called the "Woods Procedure." It requires the FBI to confirm to a federal judge that the warrant they are seeking is based on verified evidence. The dossier turned out to be DNC-funded Russian propaganda that they knew all along was bullshit. THAT makes it illegal.



    By investigating already proven Democrat crimes? Um...no. That wouldn't logically make him look like a fool. Try thinking before you speak, dumb-ass]
    Wrong, shocker, nowhere in your radio rhetoric did you establish that the "DOJ decided that the last two FISA renewals to spy on Carter Page were illegal" which the intial topic post claimed. Hannity inneundos aren't facts, sorry

  5. The Following User Groans At archives For This Awful Post:

    Earl (02-29-2020)

  6. #64 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    6,180
    Thanks
    2,837
    Thanked 4,318 Times in 2,772 Posts
    Groans
    65
    Groaned 215 Times in 209 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arminius View Post
    The dossier was first obtained by the FBI on 7/5/16 ... It was repeatedly leaked to the press for MONTHS before Trump was elected to prevent him from winning, while simultaneously being used to illegally spy and launch bullshit investigations.
    Do you contend that some time before November 2016 the Democrats running the FBI leaked that they were investigating Trump's campaign for possible collusion with Russian election interference?

    If they were conspiring to stop Trump at all costs, that's what they should have done. This is the part I don't understand: they didn't do that. Instead, Comey anounced that he was reopening the investigation into the Clinton email saga. Did they get their orders from the DNC mixed up?

  7. #65 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Wrong, shocker, nowhere in your radio rhetoric did you establish that the "DOJ decided that the last two FISA renewals to spy on Carter Page were illegal" which the intial topic post claimed. Hannity inneundos aren't facts, sorry
    you idiot. I posted a link where Wray agreed with Ratcliff under questioning the FISAs were "illegal"

    Horowitz can't make a charge of illegality -but he pointed out and the FISC agreed they were "not valid"

  8. #66 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    10,720
    Thanks
    1,623
    Thanked 4,770 Times in 3,312 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 166 Times in 157 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Wrong, shocker, nowhere in your radio rhetoric did you establish that the "DOJ decided that the last two FISA renewals to spy on Carter Page were illegal" which the intial topic post claimed. Hannity inneundos aren't facts, sorry
    Illiterate, shocker, nowhere in the OP or anywhere else in this thread did I claim that the DOJ declared the FISA applications were illegal. You are literally responding to a point I never made. The basis of it being illegal, obviously, as stated clearly in plain English, is that the applications lied about the evidence being verified. You being too illiterate to comprehend what is being argued is no one's problem but your own. And hurling empty smear labels like "Hannity innuendos" (while misspelling said labels, further demonstrating said literacy issues) doesn't magically convert provable established facts into some propaganda just because that's what you want to be true.

    Next embarrassingly inept and dishonest ploy from a laughable moron, please.



    Quote Originally Posted by dukkha View Post
    you idiot. I posted a link where Wray agreed with Ratcliff under questioning the FISAs were "illegal"

    Horowitz can't make a charge of illegality -but he pointed out and the FISC agreed they were "not valid"
    And then there is this.

    What else you got, archives?


    Last edited by artichoke; 02-29-2020 at 04:20 AM.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to artichoke For This Post:

    Earl (02-29-2020)

  10. #67 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default

    I will believe Graham when I see it. He is a deep state RINO hiding in plain sight. He hasn’t done shit sine taking over judiciary.

  11. #68 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    10,720
    Thanks
    1,623
    Thanked 4,770 Times in 3,312 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 166 Times in 157 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tranquillus in Exile View Post
    Do you contend that some time before November 2016 the Democrats running the FBI leaked that they were investigating Trump's campaign for possible collusion with Russian election interference?
    Establishment elites in key leadership positions in Obama's DOJ and FBI made shocking numbers of requests to the NSA to remove the blacked out names of the Trump associates identified in these DNC dossier-based (hence fake, and illegally manufactured) reports as having at any time met with any Russian anywhere. Those names are blacked out to protect U.S. citizen privacy as required by law, but requests can be made to remove the blacked out redaction of names so that they can be discussed in classified meetings. Then those revealed names were systematically leaked to the press on a massive, sweeping scale to make it look like intelligence reports were coming out of the woodwork showing that Trump was colluding with Russia despite literally none of the evidence showing that.

    It's basically money-laundering, but with accusations instead of money. Manufacture fake evidence against your opponent, run it through intelligence agencies and get them to copy and paste it onto government documents, then leak those fake reports to the press pretending that the government has this plethora of proof that your opponent did something wrong.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tranquillus in Exile View Post
    If they were conspiring to stop Trump at all costs, that's what they should have done.
    It's beyond dispute at this point that this is exactly what they were trying to accomplish. But they got caught and failed.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tranquillus in Exile View Post
    This is the part I don't understand: they didn't do that. Instead, Comey anounced that he was reopening the investigation into the Clinton email saga. Did they get their orders from the DNC mixed up?
    Those same Obama DOJ and FBI officials were also caught doctoring the evidence to make Hillary look innocent despite overwhelming proof that she deliberately committed numerous felonies not only storing highly classified information on a private server despite having signed numerous documents confirming that she knew doing this would make her guilty of a major federal crime (and it has since been proven that Chinese and Russian spied DID in fact gain access to highly classified information due to her felonies), but also destroying evidence under subpoena once she was caught. This was all swept under the rug. Then the classified emails she and Obama's officials helped destroy and bury were found on Anthony Weiner's computer and everything they had done to conceal her crimes was exposed. This happened at the end of September 2016. Between this and the fact that Comey realized at this point that Hillary was not necessarily going to win the election and protect everyone who rigged the election for her, he reversed course and pretended to re-open the investigation into her many, many crimes just long enough to not look like a co-conspirator trying to weaponize law enforcement to steal an election for one side. It was CYA that created just enough reasonable doubt to keep him out of prison.

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to artichoke For This Post:

    dukkha (02-29-2020), Earl (02-29-2020)

  13. #69 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    10,720
    Thanks
    1,623
    Thanked 4,770 Times in 3,312 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 166 Times in 157 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    I will believe Graham when I see it. He is a deep state RINO hiding in plain sight. He hasn’t done shit sine taking over judiciary.
    Last edited by artichoke; 02-29-2020 at 04:24 AM.

  14. #70 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    6,180
    Thanks
    2,837
    Thanked 4,318 Times in 2,772 Posts
    Groans
    65
    Groaned 215 Times in 209 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arminius View Post
    Establishment elites in key leadership positions in Obama's DOJ and FBI made shocking numbers of requests to the NSA to remove the blacked out names of the Trump associates identified in these DNC dossier-based (hence fake, and illegally manufactured) reports as having at any time met with any Russian anywhere. Those names are blacked out to protect U.S. citizen privacy as required by law, but requests can be made to remove the blacked out redaction of names so that they can be discussed in classified meetings. Then those revealed names were systematically leaked to the press on a massive, sweeping scale to make it look like intelligence reports were coming out of the woodwork showing that Trump was colluding with Russia despite literally none of the evidence showing that.

    It's basically money-laundering, but with accusations instead of money. Manufacture fake evidence against your opponent, run it through intelligence agencies and get them to copy and paste it onto government documents, then leak those fake reports to the press pretending that the government has this plethora of proof that your opponent did something wrong.



    It's beyond dispute at this point that this is exactly what they were trying to accomplish. But they got caught and failed.



    Those same Obama DOJ and FBI officials were also caught doctoring the evidence to make Hillary look innocent despite overwhelming proof that she deliberately committed numerous felonies not only storing highly classified information on a private server despite having signed numerous documents confirming that she knew doing this would make her guilty of a major federal crime (and it has since been proven that Chinese and Russian spied DID in fact gain access to highly classified information due to her felonies), but also destroying evidence under subpoena once she was caught. This was all swept under the rug. Then the classified emails she and Obama's officials helped destroy and bury were found on Anthony Weiner's computer and everything they had done to conceal her crimes was exposed. This happened at the end of September 2016. Between this and the fact that Comey realized at this point that Hillary was not necessarily going to win the election and protect everyone who rigged the election for her, he reversed course and pretended to re-open the investigation into her many, many crimes just long enough to not look like a co-conspirator trying to weaponize law enforcement to steal an election for one side. It was CYA that created just enough reasonable doubt to keep him out of prison.
    Permit me to repeat the question: did anyone leak that the FBI was investigating Trump's campaign for possible Russian collusion?

    If "they" were out to sink Trump, that's the one thing they should have done BEFORE THE ELECTION. Did they?


    ADDED

    This is from a high-level leak in April 2017, in another country:

    << GCHQ first became aware in late 2015 of suspicious “interactions” between figures connected to Trump and known or suspected Russian agents, a source close to UK intelligence said. This intelligence was passed to the US as part of a routine exchange of information, they added.

    Over the next six months, until summer 2016, a number of western agencies shared further information on contacts between Trump’s inner circle and Russians ...

    “It looks like the US agencies were asleep,” the source added. “They [the European agencies] were saying: ‘There are contacts going on between people close to Mr Trump and people we believe are Russian intelligence agents. You should be wary of this.’ >>
    Last edited by Tranquillus in Exile; 02-29-2020 at 10:44 AM.

  15. #71 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    10,720
    Thanks
    1,623
    Thanked 4,770 Times in 3,312 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 166 Times in 157 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tranquillus in Exile View Post
    Permit me to repeat the question: did anyone leak that the FBI was investigating Trump's campaign for possible Russian collusion?
    Permit me to repeat the answer, as I did here. After unmasking an unprecedented number of Trump associates for the purpose of making it look like there was a plethora of government evidence (when there was zero, as Mueller confirmed) that Trump people were colluding with Russia, the names revealed by that process for were then repeatedly illegally leaked for months to the press...again, to make it look like this DNC-funded misinformation was coming from legitimate government sources.

    Need it explained a third time?

    Quote Originally Posted by Tranquillus in Exile View Post
    If "they" were out to sink Trump, that's the one thing they should have done BEFORE THE ELECTION. Did they?
    Trying to rig and steal an election yet failing means they didn't try? Well, I guess the impeachment case can be negated then, because the non-crime they accused Trump of TRYING but failing to commit was never actually successful, according to their narrative.



    Quote Originally Posted by Tranquillus in Exile View Post
    ADDED

    This is from a high-level leak in April 2017, in another country:

    << GCHQ first became aware in late 2015 of suspicious “interactions” between figures connected to Trump and known or suspected Russian agents, a source close to UK intelligence said. This intelligence was passed to the US as part of a routine exchange of information, they added.

    Over the next six months, until summer 2016, a number of western agencies shared further information on contacts between Trump’s inner circle and Russians ...

    “It looks like the US agencies were asleep,” the source added. “They [the European agencies] were saying: ‘There are contacts going on between people close to Mr Trump and people we believe are Russian intelligence agents. You should be wary of this.’ >>
    The initial Fusion GPS opposition research pushing the Russian collusion theory began in October of 2015. And as we have seen with Steele and Simpson, they were willing to peddle their propaganda overseas to stage and manufacture credibility for this fraud. And so was the FBI/DOJ. When questions started being asked about whether this entire collusion conspiracy theory really was based entirely on fake DNC-funded smear propaganda, the FBI and DOJ Russian misinformation (from the dossier) suddenly and magically appeared in the hands of foreign spies like Alexander Downer and Stefan Halper, who were also caught overtly trying to stage fake exchanges with Trump officials to manufacture evidence to legitimize the Democrat frame job.

    Pointing out that foreign intelligence services were tipped off to signs of scattered interactions early on is COMPATIBLE with the existing facts of the hoax.

  16. #72 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    So, how's this important news story working?

  17. #73 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    10,720
    Thanks
    1,623
    Thanked 4,770 Times in 3,312 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 166 Times in 157 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Micawber View Post
    So, how's this important news story working?

    The announcement of an investigation...and you want to know the status of said investigation...within a couple of days? It took how many YEARS for Mueller to debunk the Russia hoax?



  18. #74 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    6,180
    Thanks
    2,837
    Thanked 4,318 Times in 2,772 Posts
    Groans
    65
    Groaned 215 Times in 209 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arminius View Post
    Permit me to repeat the answer ... After unmasking an unprecedented number of Trump associates for the purpose of making it look like there was a plethora of government evidence (when there was zero, as Mueller confirmed) that Trump people were colluding with Russia, the names revealed by that process for were then repeatedly illegally leaked for months to the press...again, to make it look like this DNC-funded misinformation was coming from legitimate government sources.

    Need it explained a third time?
    Yup. If the "Democrats" running the FBI (Comey and McCabe?) wanted to swing the election, the one thing they should have done was leak the fact that Trump was under FBI investigation for possible collusion with a hostile foreign power. They didn't. Even after the inauguration, Trump had to ask Comey whether he was under FBI investigation


    The initial Fusion GPS opposition research pushing the Russian collusion theory began in October of 2015. And as we have seen with Steele and Simpson, they were willing to peddle their propaganda overseas to stage and manufacture credibility for this fraud. And so was the FBI/DOJ. When questions started being asked about whether this entire collusion conspiracy theory really was based entirely on fake DNC-funded smear propaganda, the FBI and DOJ Russian misinformation (from the dossier) suddenly and magically appeared in the hands of foreign spies like Alexander Downer and Stefan Halper, who were also caught overtly trying to stage fake exchanges with Trump officials to manufacture evidence to legitimize the Democrat frame job.

    Pointing out that foreign intelligence services were tipped off to signs of scattered interactions early on is COMPATIBLE with the existing facts of the hoax.
    This is an attempt to twist the facts to fit your "theory". It doesn't work. The most glaring anomaly is that the DNC commissioned Fusion GPS in April 2016; then Fusion hired Steele in June 2016. Yet according to your theory, they were busy planting disinformation about Trump with foreign intel agencies in 2015, when virtually no one thought that Trump would be the Republican nominee.

    I quit - this discussion is going nowhere.

  19. #75 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    10,720
    Thanks
    1,623
    Thanked 4,770 Times in 3,312 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 166 Times in 157 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tranquillus in Exile View Post
    Yup. If the "Democrats" running the FBI (Comey and McCabe?) wanted to swing the election, the one thing they should have done was leak the fact that Trump was under FBI investigation for possible collusion with a hostile foreign power. They didn't. Even after the inauguration, Trump had to ask Comey whether he was under FBI investigation
    But, they DID do that. Trump was selectively briefed by Comey only on the most absurd parts of the dossier so that it could be claimed that the White House had been notified. The part about Democrats funding a made-up collusion witch hunt was carefully left out, but the fact that there was an official White House meeting about the fringe aspects of the investigation gave reporters all the cover they needed to start selling the scam to their audiences. The meeting was immediately leaked to the press and they ran with it unquestioningly and relentlessly for YEARS, by design.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tranquillus in Exile View Post
    This is an attempt to twist the facts to fit your "theory". It doesn't work. The most glaring anomaly is that the DNC commissioned Fusion GPS in April 2016; then Fusion hired Steele in June 2016. Yet according to your theory, they were busy planting disinformation about Trump with foreign intel agencies in 2015, when virtually no one thought that Trump would be the Republican nominee.
    That's because Fusion GPS was initially hired by liberal Republicans running against Trump in the primaries. Once Trump secured the nomination, it was dropped until Democrats paid Fusion GPS to resurrect it and turn it into a straight-up coup attempt.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tranquillus in Exile View Post
    I quit - this discussion is going nowhere.
    It's fine to admit you're losing and retreat. Nothing wrong with that if the facts turn out to show that you're wrong. It happens.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 112
    Last Post: 12-05-2019, 05:47 PM
  2. Replies: 34
    Last Post: 11-22-2019, 07:20 PM
  3. The DEMOCRAT coup attempt in the news
    By Legion in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-10-2019, 06:56 PM
  4. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-24-2019, 08:51 AM
  5. Lindsey Graham on the Shutdown.
    By Jarod in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 01-27-2019, 01:02 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •