Quote: "The United States-led coalition failed to support the uprisings, afraid that the Iraqi state would be dissolved if they succeeded." - there was a time the US wanted Saddam in power as a stabilizing force.
Its the evidence that shows top US gov officials told the public the war was against terrorism like al-queda to gain support for attacking Iraq.That isn't the war resolution dumbass.
No shitwit, I claimed that Saddam was against Al-qeada. Which he was. Osama hated Hussien's secular and decedent ways. Just because they were in the country doesn't mean they were allies.Your claim was that Al Qaeda wasn't in Iraq during Saddams reign; I showed you that you are wrong and stupid.
Now I do remember the talk about missile inspectors, but that wasn't the battle cry - it as WMD's and al-queda that got people riled up to go t the Cheney quagmire of Iraq. When usually such a situation merits increased sanctions. Especially when it turned out he didn't have them! Why did it have to be war then a failed attempt at rebuilding?WTF; are you a lazy putz or what? You don't know how to google?
Bookmarks