Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19

Thread: Fact checking climate predictions: How'd they do?

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    15,288
    Thanks
    3,870
    Thanked 5,011 Times in 3,467 Posts
    Groans
    1,286
    Groaned 494 Times in 452 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default Fact checking climate predictions: How'd they do?



    LOL
    >THE SKY IS FALLING
    >THE SKY IS FALLING
    >THE SKY IS FALLING

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,522
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 24,567 Times in 17,094 Posts
    Groans
    5,280
    Groaned 4,575 Times in 4,254 Posts

    Default

    Excellent if accuracy is your quest, Global warming is being proven more every day.

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    Excellent if accuracy is your quest, Global warming is being proven more every day.
    Then you should do your part and voluntarily stop breathing and emitting CO2 when you exhale.

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,843
    Thanks
    30,532
    Thanked 12,939 Times in 11,525 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    Excellent if accuracy is your quest, Global warming is being proven more every day.
    Define 'global warming'. You can't prove a meaningless buzzword.

  5. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,522
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 24,567 Times in 17,094 Posts
    Groans
    5,280
    Groaned 4,575 Times in 4,254 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Into the Night View Post
    Define 'global warming'. You can't prove a meaningless buzzword.
    Scientists have done exactly that. If you are arguing nomenclature, you are deflecting.

  6. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    86,919
    Thanks
    35,051
    Thanked 21,761 Times in 17,091 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,342 Times in 2,261 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tinfoil View Post


    LOL
    >THE SKY IS FALLING
    >THE SKY IS FALLING
    >THE SKY IS FALLING
    A historian is talking about climate warming?

  7. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,843
    Thanks
    30,532
    Thanked 12,939 Times in 11,525 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    Scientists have done exactly that. If you are arguing nomenclature, you are deflecting.
    False authority fallacy. You don't get to speak for unnamed 'scientists'. Define 'global warming'. Stop evading.

  8. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,522
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 24,567 Times in 17,094 Posts
    Groans
    5,280
    Groaned 4,575 Times in 4,254 Posts

    Default

    The weather scientists use super-powerful computers and input all the accumulated data they possibly can get Then they run it so it created models and predictions. https://insideclimatenews.org/news/0...eyenne-wyoming

  9. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,522
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 24,567 Times in 17,094 Posts
    Groans
    5,280
    Groaned 4,575 Times in 4,254 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Into the Night View Post
    False authority fallacy. You don't get to speak for unnamed 'scientists'. Define 'global warming'. Stop evading.
    I am not your secretary and do not answer to you. https://insideclimatenews.org/news/0...eyenne-wyoming It is science bunky, not Rush Limbaugh level logic.

  10. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    I am not your secretary and do not answer to you. https://insideclimatenews.org/news/0...eyenne-wyoming It is science bunky, not Rush Limbaugh level logic.
    Translation: I can't define it but you better believe me because I said so.

  11. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,522
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 24,567 Times in 17,094 Posts
    Groans
    5,280
    Groaned 4,575 Times in 4,254 Posts

    Default

    The weather predictions were not severe enough. In many places, it is worse than the predictions. In a few, less severe. that proves it is a big planet not that the global warming scientists are wrong. they are not.
    And again, the only mistake is doing nothing. If we clean the air land and water to stave off global warming, we may save the planet. If the scientific data is all wrong, we will end up with a cleaner planet. The only mistake is to do nothing. Trump is doing the opposite,. He is gutting environmental regulation and slashing staff. He is an anti-environmentalist. How the right can allow this mess to continue is a mystery.

  12. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    71,685
    Thanks
    6,597
    Thanked 12,131 Times in 9,660 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 504 Times in 477 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    they're doing mark to model, like wallstreet wanted to do.

  13. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    71,685
    Thanks
    6,597
    Thanked 12,131 Times in 9,660 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 504 Times in 477 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    The weather predictions were not severe enough. In many places, it is worse than the predictions. In a few, less severe. that proves it is a big planet not that the global warming scientists are wrong. they are not.
    And again, the only mistake is doing nothing. If we clean the air land and water to stave off global warming, we may save the planet. If the scientific data is all wrong, we will end up with a cleaner planet. The only mistake is to do nothing. Trump is doing the opposite,. He is gutting environmental regulation and slashing staff. He is an anti-environmentalist. How the right can allow this mess to continue is a mystery.
    we've known the size of the planet for some time now, doy.

  14. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,843
    Thanks
    30,532
    Thanked 12,939 Times in 11,525 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    The weather scientists use super-powerful computers and input all the accumulated data they possibly can get Then they run it so it created models and predictions. https://insideclimatenews.org/news/0...eyenne-wyoming
    Computer simulations are not data. They are random number generators. It is not possible for any gas or vapor to warm the Earth. You can't create energy from nothing.

  15. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,843
    Thanks
    30,532
    Thanked 12,939 Times in 11,525 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    I am not your secretary and do not answer to you. https://insideclimatenews.org/news/0...eyenne-wyoming It is science bunky, not Rush Limbaugh level logic.
    False authority fallacy. Computer simulations are not data. They are random number generators. Define 'global warming'. Stop evading.

Similar Threads

  1. Fact-checking the second volume of the U.S. National Climate Assessment
    By cancel2 2022 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-05-2018, 06:08 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-05-2018, 05:58 PM
  3. Fact checking Obama
    By Big Money in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-05-2014, 12:18 PM
  4. fact checking...
    By PostmodernProphet in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-07-2012, 06:32 AM
  5. Fact Checking the Fact Checkers...
    By Cancel 2016.2 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 08-31-2012, 11:43 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •