Fact checking climate predictions: How'd they do?

[Into the Night]

The weather predictions were not severe enough. In many places, it is worse than the predictions. In a few, less severe. that proves it is a big planet not that the global warming scientists are wrong. they are not.

Argument from randU fallacy. Computer simulations are nothing more than random number generators.

And again, the only mistake is doing nothing.

Pascal's Wager fallacy.

If we clean the air land and water

Clean what out of them? Define 'pollution'.

to stave off global warming,

Define 'global warming'. Buzzword fallacy.

we may save the planet.

From what?

If the scientific data is all wrong,

There is no such thing as 'scientific' data. Science is a set of theories, not data. There is no data for global temperatures. Computer simulations are not data.

we will end up with a cleaner planet.

Cleaner? What's dirty about it? Void argument fallacy.

The only mistake is to do nothing.

Pascal's Wager fallacy.

Trump is doing the opposite,.

The opposite of nothing??

He is gutting environmental regulation and slashing staff.

He actually isn't, but he should. The U.S. government has no authority in this area.

He is an anti-environmentalist.

No, that would be YOU. You want to reduce carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. That would be devastating to plant life.

How the right can allow this mess to continue is a mystery.

The federal government has no authority over environment. There is nothing in the Constitution that gave it that authority. The EPA is unconstitutional. It should be dissolved. It's a State or local issue, if anything.

[CFM]

A clock is correct two more times/day than these idiots have been in 50+ years.

[Nordberg]

Argument from randU fallacy. Computer simulations are nothing more than random number generators.

Pascal's Wager fallacy.

Clean what out of them? Define 'pollution'.

Define 'global warming'. Buzzword fallacy.

From what?

There is no such thing as 'scientific' data. Science is a set of theories, not data. There is no data for global temperatures. Computer simulations are not data.

Cleaner? What's dirty about it? Void argument fallacy.

Pascal's Wager fallacy.

The opposite of nothing??

He actually isn't, but he should. The U.S. government has no authority in this area.

No, that would be YOU. You want to reduce carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. That would be devastating to plant life.

The federal government has no authority over environment. There is nothing in the Constitution that gave it that authority. The EPA is unconstitutional. It should be dissolved. It's a State or local issue, if anything.

What an idiot. Do you think anyone wants zero co2? You makeup arguments and then debate yourself. What a joke you are

[Into the Night]

What an idiot. Do you think anyone wants zero co2? You makeup arguments and then debate yourself. What a joke you are

No, they are your arguments. You deny them now??