So Russia is interfering to help Bernie!

[Truth Detector]

Lol, you’re silly

Lol, you're stupid and dishonest.

[Truth Detector]

You lack self awareness,

I R O N Y!!!!

....you are a racist.

No, you're a racist. You think minorities are too stupid to do something as simple as getting an ID.

[Truth Detector]

You’re silly

You're stupid and ignorant.

[Truth Detector]

It’s because you devolve into the same silly stuff, because you’re silly.

Irony from a dishonest dullard who devolves into race hustling when caught lying and looking stupid.

[Truth Detector]

You get boring very quickly, a broken record who constantly repeats the same trite, unoriginal thoughts. Kitty Litter. Have a nice day, racist.

^Thinks she isn't a boor.

[Wolverine]

Russia is interfering to create chaos. It is sad that MCConnell refuses to take measure to protect our election process.

Do not try that crap!
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...SAAEgJmg_D_BwE

[Wolverine]

I don’t support a federal or state issued ID.

There are other ways Russia and others are interfering with the election process besides at the polls.

So then you do not care about cheating, anyone against a national, or state voter id wants to cheat, all democrat are against voter ID

[Wolverine]

In other words, you claims are nothing more than meaningless statements designed to pretend you're concerned.

BTW, a driver's license is a state issued ID.

And now we have states giving licenses to illegals!

[Phantasmal]

Do not try that crap!
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...SAAEgJmg_D_BwE

Yes, Obama should have ignored Mitch McConnell, I bet it is one of his regrets.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.ken...120718538.html

[anonymoose]

Russia is interfering to create chaos.

Chaos indeed. Now that Russia is helping Bernie and DJT I'm really confused as to who to support.

[dukkha]

believing anything about da Russians from our INTEL is a fool's game

Mueller’s Own Report Undercuts Its Core Russia-Meddling Claims
https://www.realclearinvestigations....ng_claims.html
a close examination of the report shows that none of those headline assertions are supported by the report’s evidence or other publicly available sources. They are further undercut by investigative shortcomings and the conflicts of interest of key players involved:

*The report uses qualified and vague language to describe key events, indicating that Mueller and his investigators do not actually know for certain whether Russian intelligence officers stole Democratic Party emails, or how those emails were transferred to WikiLeaks.

*The report's timeline of events appears to defy logic. According to its narrative, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange announced the publication of Democratic Party emails not only before he received the documents but before he even communicated with the source that provided them.

*There is strong reason to doubt Mueller’s suggestion that an alleged Russian cutout called Guccifer 2.0 supplied the stolen emails to Assange.
Mueller’s decision not to interview Assange – a central figure who claims Russia was not behind the hack – suggests an unwillingness to explore avenues of evidence on fundamental questions.

*U.S. intelligence officials cannot make definitive conclusions about the hacking of the Democratic National Committee computer servers because they did not analyze those servers themselves. Instead, they relied on the forensics of CrowdStrike, a private contractor for the DNC that was not a neutral party, much as “Russian dossier” compiler Christopher Steele, also a DNC contractor, was not a neutral party. This puts two Democrat-hired contractors squarely behind underlying allegations in the affair – a key circumstance that Mueller ignores.

*Further, the government allowed CrowdStrike and the Democratic Party's legal counsel to submit redacted records, meaning CrowdStrike and not the government decided what could be revealed or not regarding evidence of hacking.

*Mueller’s report conspicuously does not allege that the Russian government carried out the social media campaign. Instead it blames, as Mueller said in his closing remarks, "a private Russian entity" known as the Internet Research Agency (IRA).

*Mueller also falls far short of proving that the Russian social campaign was sophisticated, or even more than minimally related to the 2016 election. As with the collusion and Russian hacking allegations, Democratic officials had a central and overlooked hand in generating the alarm about Russian social media activity.

*John Brennan, then director of the CIA, played a seminal and overlooked role in all facets of what became Mueller’s investigation: the suspicions that triggered the initial collusion probe; the allegations of Russian interference; and the intelligence assessment that purported to validate the interference allegations that Brennan himself helped generate. Yet Brennan has since revealed himself to be, like CrowdStrike and Steele, hardly a neutral party -- in fact a partisan with a deep animus toward Trump.
~~
None of this means that the Mueller report's core finding of "sweeping and systematic" Russian government election interference is necessarily false. But his report does not present sufficient evidence to substantiate it.

[dukkha]

Chaos indeed. Now that Russia is helping Bernie and DJT I'm really confused as to who to support.

da Russians!!!

[CFM]

And now we have states giving licenses to illegals!

Where is Phantasmal opposing that?

[Wolverine]

Yes, Obama should have ignored Mitch McConnell, I bet it is one of his regrets.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.ken...120718538.html

You are so far behind you think you are in first!
https://ratcliffe.house.gov/news/doc...?DocumentID=21

[Nordberg]

Yes, Obama should have ignored Mitch McConnell, I bet it is one of his regrets.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.ken...120718538.html

Obama did not want to make it look like he was putting his finger on the scale. He was aware of the power presidents have and would not get involved. Trump would never do that. It is not in his character.