Page 9 of 10 FirstFirst ... 5678910 LastLast
Results 121 to 135 of 146

Thread: Intell: Russia Interfering Again. We Don't Want To Know. Shoot The Messenger.

  1. #121 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,970
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,174 Times in 10,392 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PoliTalker View Post
    Hello domer 76,



    And you think this is a great argument for progressive policies?

    This just makes it look like you can't think of anything better to say than insults.

    And I know that's not true.
    I was responding to another RW moron that can’t distinguish an adjective from a proper noun. My response had ZERO to do with progressive policy or any policy for that matter.

  2. #122 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    14,055
    Thanks
    2,436
    Thanked 8,812 Times in 6,202 Posts
    Groans
    568
    Groaned 493 Times in 469 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PoliTalker View Post
    Our top intelligence official to Congress: Russia is at it again.

    The response from the WH?

    Fire the person with the bad news. Replace him with a neophyte who knows nothing about how to do the job. But he is totally loyal to DT personally.

    "The Times reported that lawmakers were told Russia is interfering in the 2020 election specifically to get Trump reelected."

    "After the classified briefing, Trump brought Maguire into the Oval Office for a "dressing down," The Post reported."

    "According to The Post, the briefing was the "catalyst" for the president's decision to replace Maguire with Richard Grenell, a controversial figure and fierce loyalist who has served as the US ambassador to Germany."

    Grenell has no experience or background in intelligence but is now charged with overseeing the 17 agencies that make up the US intelligence community."

    "Trump has continued to exhibit skepticism, despite ongoing warnings from the US intelligence community about the potential for Russia, among other countries, to interfere in the 2020 election.

    The US intelligence community, which the president has repeatedly expressed animosity toward over the course of his tenure, concluded with high confidence in 2017 that Russia interfered in 2016 to propel Trump to the Oval Office.

    The Senate Intelligence Committee in July 2018 released a report backing up the intelligence community's findings.

    In October, the committee released a report urging Trump to "reinforce with the public the danger" posed by foreign election interference leading up to the 2020 election."

    Business Insider Story follows similar stories in Washington Post and New York Times
    Even CNN is walking this stupid shit back. Thinking people knew it was fake news right off the bat, but even liberal retards have to admit it now. Yes you I'm talking to you.

    US intelligence briefer appears to have overstated assessment of 2020 Russian interference

    Washington(CNN)The US intelligence community's top election security official appears to have overstated the intelligence community's formal assessment of Russian interference in the 2020 election, omitting important nuance during a briefing with lawmakers earlier this month, three national security officials told CNN.
    Every life matters

  3. #123 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    34,430
    Thanks
    23,941
    Thanked 19,095 Times in 13,072 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 5,908 Times in 5,169 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Good morning domer76,

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    I was responding to another RW moron that can’t distinguish an adjective from a proper noun. My response had ZERO to do with progressive policy or any policy for that matter.
    That was precisely what struck me. We'd be better off by making our case based on the differences of POV.

    Stone made a statement. He didn't insult anybody personally. He expressed a view:

    Quote Originally Posted by Stone View Post
    By the time Trump gets done with his second term the democrat party we have come to know wont even exist anymore. he will have helped successfully destroy it. Much of the damage will have been done by themselves though. The old school types will get absorbed into the Republican ranks, while the far left goes off the rails and ends up shrinking. SWEET!
    You didn't try to dispute his remark. Instead you decided to hurl insults. I don't think that's a very effective way of making the case that his thinking is flawed. He was right, though, when he said it triggered you.

    Here's how it came across to this observer: He stated a political view. It set you off and you lost your cool. And I know you can do better than that.

    Here's all you had to say:

    Hello Stone,

    DT is not getting a second term. Democrats are pretty hard to unite because there are so many free thinkers under that umbrella. So many diverse views and perspectives there. People really think for themselves before becoming Democrats. They do not fall in line like Republicans. That can make it hard for Democrats to take power, unite behind one leader, one concept. Republicans have it easy in that respect. Their narrow platform is totally take it or leave it. If you're on board they you buy in to the whole enchilada. It's all or nothing with the Republican party. Anybody who speaks out against party of it is thrown out, called a RINO. There is a reason there is no similar thing such as a 'DINO.'

    Obama and DT have one thing in common. Both of them managed to unite the Democratic party. I really think DT has been more effective at it. Obama had a tough time herding the cats. But one thing is certain. Democrats are united behind one concept. Beat DT. No second term. One and done. Most of them are not sure who to rally behind but have said no matter who it is, they are voting to convict DT of his impeachment on November 3rd. And the more outrageous he gets, the more united Democrats are against him. DT managed to motivate a lot of new voters for 2016. Looks like he is about to motivate even more people to vote on November 3rd - AGAINST HIM.

    Because really, the very thought of him in the WH is an outrage. His whole plan to get elected in 2016 was to get people angry enough to vote. And that will be his undoing in 2020.
    Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.

  4. #124 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,970
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,174 Times in 10,392 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PoliTalker View Post
    Good morning domer76,



    That was precisely what struck me. We'd be better off by making our case based on the differences of POV.

    Stone made a statement. He didn't insult anybody personally. He expressed a view:



    You didn't try to dispute his remark. Instead you decided to hurl insults. I don't think that's a very effective way of making the case that his thinking is flawed. He was right, though, when he said it triggered you.

    Here's how it came across to this observer: He stated a political view. It set you off and you lost your cool. And I know you can do better than that.

    Here's all you had to say:

    Hello Stone,

    DT is not getting a second term. Democrats are pretty hard to unite because there are so many free thinkers under that umbrella. So many diverse views and perspectives there. People really think for themselves before becoming Democrats. They do not fall in line like Republicans. That can make it hard for Democrats to take power, unite behind one leader, one concept. Republicans have it easy in that respect. Their narrow platform is totally take it or leave it. If you're on board they you buy in to the whole enchilada. It's all or nothing with the Republican party. Anybody who speaks out against party of it is thrown out, called a RINO. There is a reason there is no similar thing such as a 'DINO.'

    Obama and DT have one thing in common. Both of them managed to unite the Democratic party. I really think DT has been more effective at it. Obama had a tough time herding the cats. But one thing is certain. Democrats are united behind one concept. Beat DT. No second term. One and done. Most of them are not sure who to rally behind but have said no matter who it is, they are voting to convict DT of his impeachment on November 3rd. And the more outrageous he gets, the more united Democrats are against him. DT managed to motivate a lot of new voters for 2016. Looks like he is about to motivate even more people to vote on November 3rd - AGAINST HIM.

    Because really, the very thought of him in the WH is an outrage. His whole plan to get elected in 2016 was to get people angry enough to vote. And that will be his undoing in 2020.
    Let’s try this again.

    His uneducated grammar is flawed. I made no statement about any policy.

    Anyone that can’t tell the difference between:

    Democrat
    democrat
    Democratic Party
    democratic

    is a fucking rube.

    You probably prefer:

    “Me and him”
    “I seen it”
    “I done it”

    It’s reflective of ignorance. And I point out ignorance. Untriggered.

  5. #125 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,840
    Thanks
    30,532
    Thanked 12,939 Times in 11,525 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PoliTalker View Post
    Our top intelligence official to Congress: Russia is at it again.

    The response from the WH?

    Fire the person with the bad news. Replace him with a neophyte who knows nothing about how to do the job. But he is totally loyal to DT personally.

    "The Times reported that lawmakers were told Russia is interfering in the 2020 election specifically to get Trump reelected."

    "After the classified briefing, Trump brought Maguire into the Oval Office for a "dressing down," The Post reported."

    "According to The Post, the briefing was the "catalyst" for the president's decision to replace Maguire with Richard Grenell, a controversial figure and fierce loyalist who has served as the US ambassador to Germany."

    Grenell has no experience or background in intelligence but is now charged with overseeing the 17 agencies that make up the US intelligence community."

    "Trump has continued to exhibit skepticism, despite ongoing warnings from the US intelligence community about the potential for Russia, among other countries, to interfere in the 2020 election.

    The US intelligence community, which the president has repeatedly expressed animosity toward over the course of his tenure, concluded with high confidence in 2017 that Russia interfered in 2016 to propel Trump to the Oval Office.

    The Senate Intelligence Committee in July 2018 released a report backing up the intelligence community's findings.

    In October, the committee released a report urging Trump to "reinforce with the public the danger" posed by foreign election interference leading up to the 2020 election."

    Business Insider Story follows similar stories in Washington Post and New York Times
    Russia doesn't have the ability to interfere with U.S.elections. They can't vote. The election system is by paper, and no tabulating machine is connected to the internet.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Into the Night For This Post:

    Stone (02-25-2020)

  7. #126 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    margaritaville
    Posts
    29,127
    Thanks
    12,874
    Thanked 14,454 Times in 9,909 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 867 Times in 825 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Let’s try this again.

    His uneducated grammar is flawed. I made no statement about any policy.

    Anyone that can’t tell the difference between:

    Democrat
    democrat
    Democratic Party
    democratic

    is a fucking rube.

    You probably prefer:

    “Me and him”
    “I seen it”
    “I done it”

    It’s reflective of ignorance. And I point out ignorance. Untriggered.
    I was typing on a small google chrome book, which is a pain in the ass for me. I tend not to care so much about grammar and capitalization in those situations and just consider myself lucky to get a post out at all. Most intelligent people like your friend above tend to care more about the content. You would do well to do the same.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Stone For This Post:

    PoliTalker (02-27-2020)

  9. #127 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,970
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,174 Times in 10,392 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stone View Post
    I was typing on a small google chrome book, which is a pain in the ass for me. I tend not to care so much about grammar and capitalization in those situations and just consider myself lucky to get a post out at all. Most intelligent people like your friend above tend to care more about the content. You would do well to do the same.


    Fucking illiterate rube.


  10. #128 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    margaritaville
    Posts
    29,127
    Thanks
    12,874
    Thanked 14,454 Times in 9,909 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 867 Times in 825 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post


    Fucking illiterate rube.

    Still triggered I see. I will take great pleasure in reading your posts after the upcoming election. Unless you turn out to be one of those people that hides in shame that is. Either way,.... thanks in advance for the schadenfreude!

  11. #129 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,970
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,174 Times in 10,392 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stone View Post
    Still triggered I see. I will take great pleasure in reading your posts after the upcoming election. Unless you turn out to be one of those people that hides in shame that is. Either way,.... thanks in advance for the schadenfreude!
    No hiding for me, illiterate dumbfuck. Regardless of who wins the election, you’ll still be illiterate.

  12. #130 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    margaritaville
    Posts
    29,127
    Thanks
    12,874
    Thanked 14,454 Times in 9,909 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 867 Times in 825 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    No hiding for me, illiterate dumbfuck. Regardless of who wins the election, you’ll still be illiterate.
    And you will still be a beggar wanting to confiscate the money of other better men than yourself because you are unable to be financially independent. There will always be winners and losers in life. Enjoy your stay at the bottom.

  13. #131 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    margaritaville
    Posts
    29,127
    Thanks
    12,874
    Thanked 14,454 Times in 9,909 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 867 Times in 825 Posts

    Default

    Oh,.... and your STILL triggered I see. Truth burns ............ doesnt it? LMAO

  14. #132 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,970
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,174 Times in 10,392 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stone View Post
    And you will still be a beggar wanting to confiscate the money of other better men than yourself because you are unable to be financially independent. There will always be winners and losers in life. Enjoy your stay at the bottom.


    I’m set for life, you stupid bitch. A pension til the day I die. If my spouse survives me, it continues until her death. Combine that with social security and our combined 401k accounts, I have ZERO worries, tardboy.


  15. #133 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    margaritaville
    Posts
    29,127
    Thanks
    12,874
    Thanked 14,454 Times in 9,909 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 867 Times in 825 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post


    I’m set for life, you stupid bitch. A pension til the day I die. If my spouse survives me, it continues until her death. Combine that with social security and our combined 401k accounts, I have ZERO worries, tardboy.

    Whooaaa hoho hooooooooo....BIGTIME TRIGGERED! LMAO.

  16. #134 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    margaritaville
    Posts
    29,127
    Thanks
    12,874
    Thanked 14,454 Times in 9,909 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 867 Times in 825 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post


    I’m set for life, you stupid bitch. A pension til the day I die. If my spouse survives me, it continues until her death. Combine that with social security and our combined 401k accounts, I have ZERO worries, tardboy.

    BTW.....Welfare is not a pension, nor are food stamps a 401K. Just so you know. Glad I could be of help.

  17. #135 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,970
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,174 Times in 10,392 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stone View Post
    Whooaaa hoho hooooooooo....BIGTIME TRIGGERED! LMAO.
    Set for life, taintstain. Sucks for you, doesn’t it, Rufus?


Similar Threads

  1. Russia is now interfering in the Mueller investigation.
    By Bourbon in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-31-2019, 09:28 AM
  2. Dumbass Brits think that Russia isn't allowed to shoot back
    By moon in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-11-2018, 10:08 AM
  3. Why Russia Is Interfering In The U.S. Presidential Elections
    By dukkha in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-17-2018, 07:00 PM
  4. Russia interfering wit US elections
    By evince in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-17-2016, 08:34 AM
  5. The U.S Has Officially Accused Russia of Interfering With the Election
    By christiefan915 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-08-2016, 08:58 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •