Yes, Omar DID marry her brother to enter this country reveals Somali community leader

[Truth Detector]

Do u ask the same of a lefty when they link rawstory?

Of course that insufferable dumbass doesn't.

[CFM]

Minneapolis Star-Tribune is unreliable?

Yes.

[Truth Detector]

Not that it matters, cause nobody cares, but you do realize you are basing your "view" on the word of a "Abdihakim Osman," who ever he is, as reported in a notorious British tabloid

And I thought talk radio demogogues were the best at playing conservatives

[Truth Detector]

Of course. Politics has nothing to do with it. If the source is bad, it is bad, period.

Liar.

[AProudLefty]

Link that states Minneapolis is her home town

here this will help your stupid ass

Definition of hometown
: the city or town where one was born or grew up

First of all, I didn't make the claim. That's what the article says. Anyway...

"After first arriving in New York in 1992, Omar's family secured asylum in the U.S. in 1995 and lived for a time in Arlington, Virginia, before moving to and settling in Minneapolis,"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ilhan_Omar

[AProudLefty]

Yes.

What makes you think that? That's like saying that other newspaper in major cities are unreliable.

[AProudLefty]

It means you still haven't refuted the facts.

In order to refute a claim, you have to have some CONCLUSIVE evidence. Without them, what's to refute? It's hard to prove a negative when we both have no evidence either way.

[CFM]

What makes you think that? That's like saying that other newspaper in major cities are unreliable.

The same thing that makes you think the OP's source is invalid.

[AProudLefty]

To Lefty, rawstory's validity is based on whether or not he likes what it says.

Can you please stop being an idiot for a minute?

[AProudLefty]

The same thing that makes you think the OP's source is invalid.

So it's your unfounded opinion? Got it.

[CFM]

In order to refute a claim, you have to have some CONCLUSIVE evidence. Without them, what's to refute? It's hard to prove a negative when we both have no evidence either way.

Facts you clearly can't refute. Can you refuse the OP's source?

[volsrock]

In order to refute a claim, you have to have some CONCLUSIVE evidence. Without them, what's to refute? It's hard to prove a negative when we both have no evidence either way.

Were all the "claims" against Kav true?

Were/are the sex and racist CLAIMS against Trump true?

[CFM]

So it's your unfounded opinion? Got it.

No, it's fact. Don't agree, refute them.

[AProudLefty]

[CFM]

Were all the "claims" against Kav true?

Were/are the sex and racist CLAIMS against Trump true?

No conclusive evidence there but automatically believed by the lefties of the world.