Bloomberg's income tax returns!

[Truth Detector]

See? One can support states' rights and still believe in a few exceptions.

There are no exceptions.

[LV426]

The fact is a Wyoming vote has more power than a California vote. The righty loved the Electoral college when they found it worked for them, then it suddenly was crucial to democracy. They were all for ending it before that. The EC is a vestige of a time when it was necessary to appease slave states to get the union started. That time is sort of over. One man -one vote would be best served by a popular vote both in primaries and general elections. When the Constitution was cobbled together there were no parties.

And the whole primary system is fucked and stupid too. It lasts too long, relies too much on private money, and is a distraction. The whole thing, primary-convention-general, should be 3 months, tops. 1 month of primary voting, 1 month of conventions and campaigning, and 1 month of general election voting.

The whole process can be shrunk and made more cost-effective, while also spurring higher turnout by making it easier for people to vote.

Oh, and I believe every single Post Office should also serve as a polling station, and you should be able to vote at any Post Office, anywhere, 24/7, for 30 days during the primary and another 30 days for the general.

If we did that, I guarantee voter turnout would surpass 65%, and the GOP would never win another major race.

[Truth Detector]

Bloomberg will not be the Democratic nominee, he is too Trumpian for a principled party.

Democrats? Principled?

Democrats define corrupt and hypocrite.

So is Nadler lying, stupid a hypocrite or all three in this video? I can't get any lie filled leftist hack to answer this question honestly.

Jerry Nadler | We're Lowering the Standard of Impeachment

[LV426]

If it favored Liberals, they'd be hollering about how the DEEP STATE is doing this to rob the people of Democracy.

I wouldn't say liberals, I'd say Conservative Democrats.

Liberals believe in one person, one vote, even when they were winning elections.

[Truth Detector]

Last i saw Bernie was leading. He is likely going to win.

I do hope you are right for once in your pathetic existence.

[Truth Detector]

Because he’s already made them available.

No, he hasn't. Liar.

[Truth Detector]

Absolutely. Democracy should mean "one person = one vote." The fact that some Democrats are being hypocrites about this means all they care about is winning.

^Idiot still thinks we are a democracy.

[Truth Detector]

The fact is a Wyoming vote has more power than a California vote.

That's not a fact. It's actually rather stupid and ignorant.

[Truth Detector]

Sometimes Conservatives will, in bad faith, argue that without the EC, small town votes don't matter. Which is obviously bullshit, because right now most states' votes don't matter. Unless you live in a swing state, your vote means nothing. If we had "one person = one vote" then every vote would truly matter.
But yeah, it's really just about the system working for them. If it favored Liberals, they'd be hollering about how the DEEP STATE is doing this to rob the people of Democracy.

If you were educated, which you obviously are not, you would understand the genius behind the EC. But, because you enjoy being uneducated and uninformed, you will continue to bloviate like an idiot for the rest of your life.

[StoneByStone]

If you were educated, which you obviously are not, you would understand the genius behind the EC. But, because you enjoy being uneducated and uninformed, you will continue to bloviate like an idiot for the rest of your life.

This is why you get banned from threads. You don't add anything to the discussion, you just sperg out.

[StoneByStone]

I wouldn't say liberals, I'd say Conservative Democrats.

Liberals believe in one person, one vote, even when they were winning elections.

Well yeah, I mean Liberals as in people to the left of the Republicans. Really, the Democrats are Centrists in terms of the Right to Left spectrum.

[StoneByStone]

There are no exceptions.

But we agree that national security should be a federal issue, yes?

[MAGA MAN]

So yeah, the federal government should handle national security, health, and environmental regulations. They should also handle disputes between states. But pretty much everything else should be up to the states. While I do support gay marriage, I think it's wrong that the federal government is forcing all of the states to recognize gay marriages. That should be a state issue.

If health care is a right, as Bernie the commie says, then why stop there?

[StoneByStone]

If health care is a right, as Bernie the commie says, then why stop there?

Is this the slippery slope fallacy?

[MAGA MAN]

Is this the slippery slope fallacy?

Not really. In order to remain healthy I need a house, utilities, clothing, food...