Don’t tell the evangelicals...

[AProudLefty]

One would expect you to jump in and slander Christians, you never miss the opportunity.

Do you slander Muslims?

[RB 60]

Do you slander Muslims?

Read my posts...

[AProudLefty]

Read my posts...

I read that post of yours. Others? I haven't.

[Bobb]

No, indigenous Americans were and are a diverse group of people with individual and unique religions. Many of them were put to death by "God's emissaries" for refusing to follow the Christian/Catholic god.

I see you're busy making up history to rationalize your antichristianity. I think that makes you a textbook case of an ignorant bigot.

[Minister of Truth]

Really?
I was unaware the Native People were even aware that Christianity existed. Thanks for the History lesson.

Leftists didn't exist back then, either. The founding fathers, however, who created the Constitution, should be a reliable source for whether public displays of Christianity are constitutional, or not. Naturally, they built some. Jefferson even set aside federal buildings to be used in Sunday prayer services. But, a bunch of illiberal progressives want to convince us that it's unconstitutional.

[Minister of Truth]

You rightists prove there is nothing new about them spreading falsehoods and propaganda in the name of Conservative Jesus.

If the monuments and displays were already there, then, by definition, there was nothing new about them.

[saltydancin]

And many of those unique religions practiced child sacrifice and etc.
The concept of the ‘noble indigenous’ is mythology.

Answering that question of why Jesus is so popular amongst Christians, where pedophilia put forth dhimmitude servitude of a fabricated misnomer immaculate conception for a religion of noble & holy child sacrifice as Nazi Germany exploited during WW II with the Catholic Church brokering Holocaust deaths for Islam oil to fund the war machine still has pedophiles as evangelical in the 21st century; which has been quite a feat of sociopsychopathilogical human farming.

[Jack]

Leftists didn't exist back then, either. The founding fathers, however, who created the Constitution, should be a reliable source for whether public displays of Christianity are constitutional, or not. Naturally, they built some. Jefferson even set aside federal buildings to be used in Sunday prayer services. But, a bunch of illiberal progressives want to convince us that it's unconstitutional.

"Many Americans celebrate our founding father and all they did to help create our country. What few of them know is that many of the founding fathers were also freemasons. Some of the more notable founding fathers to also be masons are: George Washington, Ben Franklin lead the Pennsylvania chapter, Paul Revere lead a Massachusetts chapter, John Hancock, and Chief Justice John Marshall who greatly influenced the shaping of the Supreme Court. All together it is believed that about nine of the fifty-six men that signed the Declaration of Independence were masons, and about thirteen of the thirty-nine that signed the US Constitutions were also masons. "
http://projects.leadr.msu.edu/uniont...e-founding-fat

[ThatOwlWoman]

One would expect you to jump in and slander Christians, you never miss the opportunity.

How interesting that you see the negative parts of Xtian history as "slander."

[ThatOwlWoman]

Only because men chose to use it for those purposes. They also use charities for evil purposes but that doesn't make charity bad.

Except that history shows that no matter what the flavor of the religion, human beings consistently and repeatedly use it for evil. Charities on the other hand, not so much.

I understand what you are trying to say, but it is impossible to make religion a separate, stand-alone entity w/o human involvement. We created it, after all. Religion is just a tool, like a hammer. You can build a house or a city with a hammer. You can also bash in your neighbor's head with it. The hammer isn't evil on its own. It's merely a tool.

[PostmodernProphet]

I read that post of yours. Others? I haven't.

then you have a lot of catching up to do.....

[saltydancin]

Leftists didn't exist back then, either. The founding fathers, however, who created the Constitution, should be a reliable source for whether public displays of Christianity are constitutional, or not. Naturally, they built some. Jefferson even set aside federal buildings to be used in Sunday prayer services. But, a bunch of illiberal progressives want to convince us that it's unconstitutional.

Wouldn't be anything if public displays of Christianity; which if discovery found is little more than pedophilia fabricated misnomer of an immaculate conception to play "man is God" with one nation under God interpretations of that Catholic Church assassination of JFK & Arab "death to the infidels" 9/11 terrorists more perfect union patriot act holycosts to continue it's tools usefulness as progressive constitutional law of the land.

[saltydancin]

One would expect you to jump in and slander Christians, you never miss the opportunity.

Why bother ? Christians slander themselves as well as anyone else in one nation under God with this Christian Nation SCOTUS tradition of sacrifice US Constitutions - old glories - old testaments to thieving arsonists just as pedophilia put forth dhimmitude servitude of a fabricated misnomer immaculate conception for a national religion of noble & holy child sacrifice at every opportunity.

[PoliTalker]

Hello Flash,

Only because men chose to use it for those purposes. They also use charities for evil purposes but that doesn't make charity bad.

It did in the case of DT. It was shut down. No redeeming value to society.

[RB 60]

How interesting that you see the negative parts of Xtian history as "slander."

No, the slander comes from you.