Two theories on how to beat Trump*.

[Jarod]

There are really two ideas here, what the Democrats go with will be very interesting.

1) Like the Republicans did with Trump* they could nominate a firebrand, an ultra liberal who excites the base and gets them out voting because the see a chance to get what they have been wanting all these years. This would be Sanders or Warren.

2) They could nominate a moderate, with the idea that a moderate wold pull more people from the middle toward the Democrats side and get more votes than Hillary Clinton got in states like Pennsylvania and Michigan. Klobarchar, Biden or Bloomberg.


What do you think? I tend to think the anti-Trump* base is already fired up and going to vote no matter what, so it might not matter much and so the liberal we really want would be the best choice. Thats how we got a black man named Obama elected president.

[CFM]

There are really two ideas here, what the Democrats go with will be very interesting.

1) Like the Republicans did with Trump* they could nominate a firebrand, an ultra liberal who excites the base and gets them out voting because the see a chance to get what they have been wanting all these years. This would be Sanders or Warren.

2) They could nominate a moderate, with the idea that a moderate wold pull more people from the middle toward the Democrats side and get more votes than Hillary Clinton got in states like Pennsylvania and Michigan. Klobarchar, Biden or Bloomberg.


What do you think? I tend to think the anti-Trump* base is already fired up and going to vote no matter what, so it might not matter much and so the liberal we really want would be the best choice. Thats how we got a black man named Obama elected president.

Obama got elected for one reason only. You dumbasses on the left thought the BOY was qualified due to skin color.

[Jarod]

Obama got elected for one reason only. You dumbasses on the left thought the BOY was qualified due to skin color.

I think that harmed his chances not helped, America is full of racists like you.

[CFM]

I think that harmed his chances not helped, America is full of racists like you.

Yet you're the one that used race to determine your vote.

There were millions more blacks that voted in 2008/2012 only to drop off in 2016 along with enough guilt ridden white n-lovers like you thinking skin color was a qualification.

[PostmodernProphet]

given that none of the above are very popular does that mean you'll have to start over for either plan to work?.....

[BRUTALITOPS]

There are really two ideas here, what the Democrats go with will be very interesting.

1) Like the Republicans did with Trump* they could nominate a firebrand, an ultra liberal who excites the base and gets them out voting because the see a chance to get what they have been wanting all these years. This would be Sanders or Warren.

2) They could nominate a moderate, with the idea that a moderate wold pull more people from the middle toward the Democrats side and get more votes than Hillary Clinton got in states like Pennsylvania and Michigan. Klobarchar, Biden or Bloomberg.


What do you think? I tend to think the anti-Trump* base is already fired up and going to vote no matter what, so it might not matter much and so the liberal we really want would be the best choice. Thats how we got a black man named Obama elected president.

I dont think democrats win with a moderate this time around. There isn't like 10% of the electorate that doesn't have their mind made up. This election is about turn out and enthusiasm. bloomberg imo would depress the democratic vote. You need someone that gets people fired up. It's not enough to just vote against someone else, you need people to always want to vote FOR someone. Democrats aren't going to stand in line for 3 hours to vote for bloomberg.

[Bill]

There are really two ideas here, what the Democrats go with will be very interesting.

1) Like the Republicans did with Trump* they could nominate a firebrand, an ultra liberal who excites the base and gets them out voting because the see a chance to get what they have been wanting all these years. This would be Sanders or Warren.

2) They could nominate a moderate, with the idea that a moderate wold pull more people from the middle toward the Democrats side and get more votes than Hillary Clinton got in states like Pennsylvania and Michigan. Klobarchar, Biden or Bloomberg.


What do you think? I tend to think the anti-Trump* base is already fired up and going to vote no matter what, so it might not matter much and so the liberal we really want would be the best choice. Thats how we got a black man named Obama elected president.

This is were the tradition of having a VP of a somewhat different persuasion or location comes in..

Being out on Super Tuesday may not necessarily mean your out of the game..

[Jarod]

given that none of the above are very popular does that mean you'll have to start over for either plan to work?.....

You have no right to post here, no integrity.

[Jarod]

This is were the tradition of having a VP of a somewhat different persuasion or location comes in..

Being out on Super Tuesday may not necessarily mean your out of the game..

So Bernie/Klobachar?
Or Bloomberg/Warren?

[Bill]

So Bernie/Klobachar?
Or Bloomberg/Warren?

Good combos IMHO..

I was hoping to see Gabby in there but I don't think this will be her time..

Amy will make a great leader, should Bernie not be able to fulfill his term.......

I would love to see her debate donnie.......

[PostmodernProphet]

You have no right to post here, no integrity.

you have no right to vote here.....you have no brain......