Biased media tries to spin failing Journalism 101 in promoting corrupt Avenatti

[artichoke]

You wasted way too much effort trying to debate his disingenuous fluff.

Yes, they should come to debate sites to copy and paste the same mindless ad hominems over and over like you.

[AProudLefty]

*Asking people to do all your thinking for you, and research, and spoon-feed you everything that's already at your fingertips, so you can pretend to catch them avoiding some BS challenge.

The request is very, very simple. You know the saying? "The burden of proof is on the one making the claim."

As for the rest of your post? I cringed so hard I had to stop.

[Superfreak]

Blinded by partisan rage, the media abandoned all objectivity and relentlessly portrayed the obviously corrupt damaged-goods Avenatti as a serious candidate instead of investigating ANY of the numerous GAPING holes in his stories or baggage in his background. Now they are squirming trying to justify propping up a crook who's facing 40 years in prison and two more trials.

Actions have consequences.

"Avenatti...appeared on CNN and MSNBC a combined 229 times over two years...CNN’s Brian Stelter was Avenatti’s biggest cheerleader, once declaring that he was a “serious” contender to challenge Trump in the 2020 presidential election."

Liberal media reaction to Michael Avenatti conviction slammed as ‘Orwellian,’ ‘appalling’

Garuds hero

[archives]

Says the guy whose sources humiliated and discredited themselves with (while FOX was vindicated on):

Yeah, "Fox was vindicated," too funny, just yesterday, "The Hill finds John Solomon 'failed' to identify key details of sources," oh look, a Fox "regular contributor" plus prime time favorite was busted, and by a conservatives source no less.

[artichoke]

The request is very, very simple. You know the saying? "The burden of proof is on the one making the claim."

That proof was posted. You pouting and refusing to look at it like a child is not the same thing as the proof not being provided. That's just you being a dishonest crybaby.



Attachment 14325

Try again, dishonest demagogue.

As for the rest of your post? I cringed so hard I had to stop.

So now you are avoiding the debate in MULTIPLE ways:

-Refusing to read posts that obliterate your bullshit.



-And demanding that other people watch video evidence FOR you and report the exact time of critical statements so you don't have to endure the trauma of witnessing other sides of the debate.



What a fragile little snowflake. Need a tissue and a safe space?

[artichoke]

Yeah, "Fox was vindicated," too funny, just yesterday, "The Hill finds John Solomon 'failed' to identify key details of sources," oh look, a Fox "regular contributor" plus prime time favorite was busted, and by a conservatives source no less.

1) On the examples I provided, the ones your counterpoint has nothing to do with, Democrat media sources were exposed as lying frauds and FOX was proven right. That was the claim, that's what was true.



2) Your subject change is the fallacy of claiming that Obama abandoning all standards and preconditions and just meeting with any dictator to give them everything they want at America's expense is the same thing as the hardball tactics of Trump incentivizing good behavior (like a business man would use leverage in any situation) by lavishing the person with desirable meetings, concessions, etc., while taking it all back away and increasing sanctions anytime the behavior comes back.

Obama's approach was appeasing, groveling, and surrendering. Trump's is bargaining. But go on telling yourself that Democrats being too stupid to comprehend an "apples and oranges" comparison fallacy when they see one is FOX being biased or proven wrong in some way.

[AProudLefty]

[SIZE=3]That proof was posted. You pouting and refusing to look at it like a child is not the same thing as the proof not being provided. That's just you being a dishonest crybaby.

All you have to do is tell me the time. That's it.

-And demanding that other people watch video evidence FOR you and report the exact time of critical statements so you don't have to endure the trauma of witnessing other sides of the debate.

Lame.

As Ebert and Siskel would say, "TWO THUMBS DOWN!"

[artichoke]

All you have to do is tell me the time. That's it.

All you have to do is watch the brief video evidence already posted. That's it.

Lame.

Lame would be more like refusing to watch a short video destroying your garbage logic and pretending that evidence hasn't been posted. Try again, posturing child.

As Ebert and Siskel would say, "TWO THUMBS DOWN!"

Coming from the most ridiculous petulant halfwit on this site, that's a compliment.

Attachment 14329

[AProudLefty]

All you have to do is watch the brief video evidence already posted. That's it.

And still no when in the video I should watch.

[artichoke]

And still no when in the video I should watch.

No honest or adult human being would make such an absurd request, so yeah. Stop crying and lying. The evidence that you're an idiot is right there for all to see. Play all the kid's games you like.

[AProudLefty]

No honest or adult human being would make such an absurd request, so yeah. Stop crying and lying. The evidence that you're an idiot is right there for all to see. Play all the kid's games you like.

What are you so afraid of? Afraid I'll find out you're lying?

[artichoke]

What are you so afraid of? Afraid I'll find out you're lying?

Says the guy refusing to watch a short video and pretending evidence wasn't posted.

[tinfoil]

Are you this dumb? Of course it's CLEARLY a hoax!!!! It's obvious to anyone over an IQ of 20. Only someone with an IQ of a carrot would seriously believe anyone would fall for it! Some Trump supporters might be dumb, but even they cannot be this dumb.

I have looked for that article in question on CNN. No such thing.

[AProudLefty]

Says the guy refusing to watch a short video and pretending evidence wasn't posted.

Still waiting. Know what? I'll probably watch the entire thing later and see if you're telling the truth or lied to me.

BTW I liked Stossel.

[AProudLefty]

We were talking about the claim (spoof) that penises cause climate warming.

BTW, that video isn't closed captioned.