Biased media tries to spin failing Journalism 101 in promoting corrupt Avenatti

[Nordberg]

Blinded by partisan rage, the media abandoned all objectivity and relentlessly portrayed the obviously corrupt damaged-goods Avenatti as a serious candidate instead of investigating ANY of the numerous GAPING holes in his stories or baggage in his background. Now they are squirming trying to justify propping up a crook who's facing 40 years in prison and two more trials.

Actions have consequences.

"Avenatti...appeared on CNN and MSNBC a combined 229 times over two years...CNN’s Brian Stelter was Avenatti’s biggest cheerleader, once declaring that he was a “serious” contender to challenge Trump in the 2020 presidential election."

Liberal media reaction to Michael Avenatti conviction slammed as ‘Orwellian,’ ‘appalling’

Nobody on the left saw him as a serious candidate, We all thought WTF, he is a lawyer defending a stripper. Those are credentials like Trumps. We did not take him seriously. If you were honest, and you are not, you would admit the rightys saw him a chance to smear the left, That is all he amounted to.

[artichoke]

We were talking about the claim (spoof) that penises cause climate warming.

BTW, that video isn't closed captioned.

We were talking about the claim that left-wing academics fell for a hilariously obviously fake story because it propped up their ridiculous propaganda. Try to keep up. And I don't give a flying fuck if you're deaf. There were three other sources posted, two of which YOU PERSONALLY FOUND. No further evidence needed.

[artichoke]

Nobody on the left saw him as a serious candidate, We all thought WTF, he is a lawyer defending a stripper. Those are credentials like Trumps.

You misspelled Obama.

We did not take him seriously. If you were honest, and you are not,

Says the person whose bullshit is CONSTANTLY proven to be a lie...hence:

-the Russia collusion hoax,
-the "Investigating Biden's corruption is worse than Biden BEING corrupt" hoax,
-the Covington Catholic hoax,
-the Roy Moore pedophile hoax,
-the Kavanaugh rape gang hoax,
-the "repealing Net Neutrality will destroy the Internet" hoax,
-the Jussie Smollett hoax,
-the Charlottesville "very fine people" hoax,
-the Duke Lacrosse team hoax,
-the fake Ukraine transcript hoax,
-the Trayvon Martin hoax,
-the "Trump admitted to sexual assault" hoax,
-the "penises cause climate change" hoax,
-the "uninsured crisis" hoax,
-the "Trump denying passports to Latinos" hoax,
-the multitude of college hate crime hoaxes,
-the "Mission Accomplished" hoax,
-the "deceptively edited video" Planned Parenthood hoax,
-the "children in cages" hoax,
-the Michael Cohen perjury/contacting the Russians hoaxes,
-the SPLC "hate group" hoax,
-the "Trump mocking people with disabilities" hoax,
-the "you can keep your doctor" hoax,
-the "immigrants are rapists, criminals, animals" hoax,
-the Kavanaugh "white power symbol" hoax,
-the "Trump asked Putin to hack the DNC" hoax,
-the polar bear dying from climate change hoax,
-the "Trump made it easier for the mentally ill to purchase guns" hoax,
-the Scaramucci Russian bankers hoax,
-the "Muslim ban" hoax,
-the global warming "consensus" hoax,
-the "Obama's scandal-free presidency" hoax,
-the Trump Jr. WikiLeaks hoax,
-the Iran nuclear appeasement hoax,
-the "polls show Trump will lose" hoax,
-the "Obamacare will never fund abortions or illegal immigrants" hoax,
-the "Hillary exonerated" hoax,
-the "white privilege" hoax,
-the voter suppression hoax,
-and the "hands up don't shoot" hoax.

you would admit the rightys saw him a chance to smear the left, That is all he amounted to.

The left propped him up as a serious candidate at every turn, and are permanently on video doing it. Can't lie your way out of this one (speaking of being honest). And yes, of course we see it as a chance to point and laugh at the ridiculous imbeciles of the left.

[AProudLefty]

We are were talking about the claim that left-wing academics fell for a hilariously obviously fake story because it propped up their ridiculous propaganda. Try to keep up. And I don't give a flying fuck if you're deaf. There were three other sources posted, two of which YOU PERSONALLY FOUND. No further evidence needed.

Yes I found two articles. One said it was a spoof. The other one was a far right site.

No mainstream media reporting.

Therefore, NOBODY FELL FOR IT.

Besides, Gender Studies is not a real science. Repeat after me: Gender Studies is not a real science.

[artichoke]

Yes I found two articles. One said it was a spoof. The other one was a far right site.

Right. Left-wing academic journals posted it thinking it was real. That's the spoof. That's the hoax. Whether your fragile snowflake mind can handle considering that provable fact or not.

No mainstream media reporting.

The "mainstream" (lunatic fringe) media have been caught lying at every turn. Them avoiding this embarrassment undoes zero of the evidence we have already posted and discussed.

Therefore, NOBODY FELL FOR IT.

Except the left-wing academic journals that published and retracted it, sure.

Don't worry, you'll comprehend this incredibly straightforward concept eventually.

Besides, Gender Studies is not a real science. Repeat after me: Gender Studies is not a real science.

We absolutely agree on this. But too bad actual peer-reviewed academic journals published it, or you might have a point.

[anonymoose]

Fox News is your source? Seriously? Oh brother.

Looks like we taught you how to click a link. Good boy.

[AProudLefty]

Right. Left-wing academic journals posted it thinking it was real. That's the spoof. That's the hoax. Whether your fragile snowflake mind can handle considering that provable fact or not.

So it's a nothingburger? Thanks for admitting.

The "mainstream" (lunatic fringe) media have been caught lying at every turn. Them avoiding this embarrassment undoes zero of the evidence we have already posted and discussed.

Both far left and far right? I agree.

Don't worry, you'll comprehend this incredibly straightforward concept eventually.

I've always understood your point. Not sure why you think I don't.

We absolutely agree on this. But too bad actual peer-reviewed academic journals published it, or you might have a point.

*Thinking that SJWs peer reviewing anything is valid*

[cancel2 2022]

Not only that but he has to hide it behind his own storyline. Must have a brick wall of an ego. I sure as hell am not clicking on a hidden link. I've had enough crap from bad sites in my past and with some of the shady clickbait news sites that pop up from time to time here, there's no way. It is often found out that what he says might not be exactly what his link will say anyway. My advice is to write Capt. Bullshit off as free entertainment.

Man, you're even more paranoid and braindead than I'd previously realised.

[artichoke]

Looks like we taught you how to click a link. Good boy.

It is a complicated and difficult task for the low-IQ left. Give them time.

[artichoke]

Man, you're even more paranoid and braindead than I'd previously realised.

As with Trump, there is one standard for us, and a completely different standard for everyone else. Apparently only conservatives are expected to post a properly-formatted APA works cited citation page with every detail of the source of every claim, instead of just providing links for everyone to independently verify the claims themselves. Such a heinous and unforgivable dirty trick to make people endure the tragic ordeal of clicking on links.

[artichoke]

So it's a nothingburger? Thanks for admitting.

Nothing about this statement indicates that it is a nothinburger: "Left-wing academic journals posted it thinking it was real. That's the spoof. That's the hoax." And try to pay attention (I can use crayons if necessary): What we're debating is whether or not it is a HOAX...which being deliberately fake, peddled as real, and believed by idiot liberals desperate to believe obviously BS environmental and anti-male propaganda...the answer is yes.

I've always understood your point. Not sure why you think I don't.

Because your "counterpoints" don't refute or even address the claim. Obviously, being completely irrational and irrelevant to a point of being asinine is why.

*Thinking that SJWs peer reviewing anything is valid*

Pretending a peer-reviewed academic journal suddenly isn't supposed to be the most legitimate and credible authority on the subject matter...just because leftists got humiliated with another hoax...

[AProudLefty]

Nothing about this statement indicates that it is a nothinburger: "Left-wing academic journals posted it thinking it was real. That's the spoof. That's the hoax." And try to pay attention (I can use crayons if necessary): What we're debating is whether or not it is a HOAX...which being deliberately fake, peddled as real, and believed by idiot liberals desperate to believe obviously BS environmental and anti-male propaganda...the answer is yes.

Still thinking that we "liberals" fell for it?

The funny irony is that YOU fell for an obvious spoof that everybody knew it was a spoof.

The fact that those three "scholars" have tried it multiple times and got rejected went over your retarded head.

The fact that you lack the comprehension skill to realize that Gender Studies has nothing to do with climate change is astounding.

Perhaps they should try submitting those "hoaxes" to the science or climatology depts for them to peer review and have them laugh at them and guys like you.

[AProudLefty]

Looks like we taught you how to click a link. Good boy.

Good boy. Have a cookie. Now go play with your retarded friends. We adults are talking.

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

avenatti 2020 was definitely a thing.

[AProudLefty]

Ok, so I watched the video. Just as I thought, you lied. Nothing in it about penises causing climate warming. The video is about SJW bullshit being passed around as legitimate studies. No different from Facebook.

BTW, as I watched the video, I had to laugh and laugh because it keeps reminding me so much about the right. The right did exactly like that for centuries. Submitting journals such as Creationism, flat earth, the Earth is 6,000 years old, bullshit about LGBT, and so on and on. The scary thing is? They ACTUALLY THINK it's true.

Thank you for the video. I found it so hilarious. I mean we can convince the wackos on the extreme left and extreme right of anything, just like the author said. But it's worse for the extreme right. Trump proves that.