Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 77

Thread: AL LAW, MEN 50+ or having fathered 3 biological kids--MANDATORY VASECTOMIES....

  1. #16 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    94,088
    Thanks
    9,829
    Thanked 33,870 Times in 21,642 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,675 Times in 5,179 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Centerleftfl View Post
    Uh oh, lawmakers are coming after 'your' MANHOOD now. It was one thing when it was the 'girls', now it's serious! Not to worry, a 'GIRL' introduced it. A DEMOCRAT. Besides the ONLY way this would ever even make it to conference, and it likely would--if it was RACE specific.


    Ted Cruz takes aim at Alabama vasectomy bill: 'Yikes'

    BY ARIS FOLLEY - 02/16/20 07:23 PM EST 2,755


    Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) took aim at legislation recently introduced in Alabama by a state representative that would, if passed, make it mandatory for certain men to get vasectomies – a bill that comes in response to legislation passed last year that seeks to ban abortion in the state.

    “Yikes,” Cruz wrote in response to the bill on Twitter on Sunday morning. “A government big enough to give you everything is big enough to take everything...literally!”

    Cruz was referring to legislation introduced by Alabama state Rep. Rolanda Hollis (D) last week that would, if passed, require men over the age of 50 in the state to get vasectomies as well as men who have had at least three biological children.

    Cruz’s tweet, which has racked up over 14,000 likes in hours, received even more comments from critics who felt his response proved Hollis’ point behind the measure.

    “Under existing law, there are no restrictions on the reproductive rights of men,” a synopsis for Hollis' bill states. "This bill would require a man to undergo a vasectomy within one month of his 50th birthday or the birth of his third biological child, whichever comes first."In an interview with AL.com last week, Hollis said that the legislation comes in response to a law passed in the state last year that seeks to make abortion illegal almost all case, including in instances of rape or incest. The bill has not yet taken effect after being blocked in court.

    “The vasectomy bill is to help with the reproductive system, and yes, it is to neutralize the abortion ban bill ... it always takes two to tango," she told the outlet.

    “We can’t put all the responsibility on women. Men need to be responsible also,” she also said...


    https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/...ectomies-at-50
    The Republicans would have been upset. They no longer exist.

  2. #17 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Althea View Post
    How do you feel about only having it apply to rapists?
    I prefer rapists be given the death penalty

  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to canceled.2021.2 For This Post:

    CFM (02-17-2020), Wolverine (02-17-2020)

  4. #18 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    9,090
    Thanks
    3,487
    Thanked 3,433 Times in 2,367 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 888 Times in 802 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Is the AL proposed law in retaliation for threats of having women sterilized after their third child?
    Russian trolls and their supporters go on Ignore, automatically: no second chance.


  5. #19 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    184,362
    Thanks
    72,407
    Thanked 35,727 Times in 27,215 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 19,585 Times in 18,174 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

  6. The Following User Groans At evince For This Awful Post:

    USFREEDOM911 (02-17-2020)

  7. #20 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    I prefer rapists be given the death penalty
    That makes the issue of whether or not this law should apply to them moot.

  8. #21 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jimmymccready View Post
    Is the AL proposed law in retaliation for threats of having women sterilized after their third child?
    https://www.al.com/news/2019/09/rep-...ry-charge.html

    Just so you'll know, Rolanda represents a district that has a 77% black majority. Otherwise, she couldn't get hired to clean the toilets at the Statehouse.

  9. #22 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    7,318
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2,883 Times in 2,239 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 124 Times in 120 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Centerleftfl View Post
    Uh oh, lawmakers are coming after 'your' MANHOOD now. It was one thing when it was the 'girls', now it's serious! Not to worry, a 'GIRL' introduced it. A DEMOCRAT. Besides the ONLY way this would ever even make it to conference, and it likely would--if it was RACE specific.


    Ted Cruz takes aim at Alabama vasectomy bill: 'Yikes'

    BY ARIS FOLLEY - 02/16/20 07:23 PM EST 2,755


    Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) took aim at legislation recently introduced in Alabama by a state representative that would, if passed, make it mandatory for certain men to get vasectomies – a bill that comes in response to legislation passed last year that seeks to ban abortion in the state.

    “Yikes,” Cruz wrote in response to the bill on Twitter on Sunday morning. “A government big enough to give you everything is big enough to take everything...literally!”

    Cruz was referring to legislation introduced by Alabama state Rep. Rolanda Hollis (D) last week that would, if passed, require men over the age of 50 in the state to get vasectomies as well as men who have had at least three biological children.

    Cruz’s tweet, which has racked up over 14,000 likes in hours, received even more comments from critics who felt his response proved Hollis’ point behind the measure.

    “Under existing law, there are no restrictions on the reproductive rights of men,” a synopsis for Hollis' bill states. "This bill would require a man to undergo a vasectomy within one month of his 50th birthday or the birth of his third biological child, whichever comes first."In an interview with AL.com last week, Hollis said that the legislation comes in response to a law passed in the state last year that seeks to make abortion illegal almost all case, including in instances of rape or incest. The bill has not yet taken effect after being blocked in court.

    “The vasectomy bill is to help with the reproductive system, and yes, it is to neutralize the abortion ban bill ... it always takes two to tango," she told the outlet.

    “We can’t put all the responsibility on women. Men need to be responsible also,” she also said...


    https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/...ectomies-at-50
    I agree...LEFT WING FASCISM is a clear and present danger. Ted Cruz …..the conservative constitutionalist....takes aim at a piece of fascist legislation presented by "D" Hollis?

  10. #23 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    72,347
    Thanks
    6,677
    Thanked 12,316 Times in 9,824 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 510 Times in 483 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    if the flesh inside women's bodies can be legislated


    then SPERM can be legislated


    turn off that spigot


    it will make for fewer abortions huh assholes
    you're a total and complete idiot.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Blackwater Lunchbreak For This Post:

    Wolverine (02-17-2020)

  12. #24 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    7,318
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2,883 Times in 2,239 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 124 Times in 120 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    The republican part would support this law


    IF

    it only applied to brown men
    Yeah.....Ted Cruz (Cuban heritage)….WOULD, IF......why do all leftists attempt to use STRAW ARGUMENTS concerning the would'a, could'a, should'a made up hypothetical. You are attempting to argue about an event that has never happened..it exist ONLY BETWEEN YOUR EARS...its not part nor lot of REALITY. You project Republicans as the evil when its is a left wing fascist democrat that wants to control the human body.....(directly in contradiction to the abortion argument....where everyone is in control of their own bodies)….but its ok with MEN?

    Idiots.

    That FLESH inside a female body? Its called a CHILD, a BABY. That sperm? Its useless as conception is impossible void of a female egg.

    Why not just Castrate all undesirable males? Evil is as evil does. Only an idiot leftist would present objective evidence against a leftist politician and then attempt to blame a republican for a democrat fascist policy.

  13. #25 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    135,276
    Thanks
    13,300
    Thanked 40,966 Times in 32,281 Posts
    Groans
    3,664
    Groaned 2,869 Times in 2,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    I can see where lib'ruls are coming from in saying no woman should be allowed to give consent to having a fourth child, since she would obviously not be of sound mind.......but if he gets a divorce and remarries, can he have three children with the second wife if she gives consent?.......
    Isaiah 6:5
    “Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”

  14. #26 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    135,276
    Thanks
    13,300
    Thanked 40,966 Times in 32,281 Posts
    Groans
    3,664
    Groaned 2,869 Times in 2,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jimmymccready View Post
    Is the AL proposed law in retaliation for threats of having women sterilized after their third child?
    and have you seen that threat made somewhere?.....
    Isaiah 6:5
    “Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”

  15. #27 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    11,869
    Thanks
    6,396
    Thanked 4,386 Times in 3,225 Posts
    Groans
    57
    Groaned 189 Times in 178 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    if the flesh inside women's bodies can be legislated


    then SPERM can be legislated


    turn off that spigot


    it will make for fewer abortions huh assholes
    Screw you, the woman is the only one with the life or death decision regarding what is legally the mans child also, you stupid mewling quim! It does take two to tango, but only one of those people gets to decide life or death of that child, that is unequal protection under the law! How many abortions have you had baby killer

  16. #28 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    11,869
    Thanks
    6,396
    Thanked 4,386 Times in 3,225 Posts
    Groans
    57
    Groaned 189 Times in 178 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    The republican part would support this law


    IF

    it only applied to brown men
    They are the ones who knock girls up and leave, that is the problem with black communities, and has been for years fatherless children, be silent woman!

  17. #29 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    11,869
    Thanks
    6,396
    Thanked 4,386 Times in 3,225 Posts
    Groans
    57
    Groaned 189 Times in 178 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    its your party and trumpy who want to starve and leave bleeding on the street people without money


    they cut all help programs with fucking glee

    even the ones FEEDING Hungry pregnant women and children

    that is the abortion plan the republicans love


    starve the hungry pregnant woman until she spontaneously aborts
    All right that is it, yours is the party that wants to kill babies, and allow illegals to run rampant receiving federal assistance and driver licenses, while vets, and American families starve and live on the streets, you ignorant stupid bitch! Just hoping, somehow, some of them can find a way to vote and give you power!

  18. #30 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    11,869
    Thanks
    6,396
    Thanked 4,386 Times in 3,225 Posts
    Groans
    57
    Groaned 189 Times in 178 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jimmymccready View Post
    Is the AL proposed law in retaliation for threats of having women sterilized after their third child?
    If they are receiving Government assistance why not!

Similar Threads

  1. Trump fathered a child with an employee
    By signalmankenneth in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-12-2018, 08:38 PM
  2. DEMOCRAT fathered a child with a 16-year-old girl
    By Русский агент in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-16-2017, 01:22 AM
  3. Rich bachelors getting vasectomies to avoid the extortion of paternity suits.
    By Text Drivers are Killers in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-28-2017, 08:07 PM
  4. Mississippi couple find out they are biological twins...
    By MAGA MAN in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 04-18-2017, 08:01 AM
  5. What JPP Retard Fathered Palin's DS Baby?
    By Timshel in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-03-2008, 01:21 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •