Bloomberg explaining how healthcare will “bankrupt us” unless we deny care to elderly

[ziggy]

[Grokmaster]

SOYLENT GREEN!!! AND TRY *NEW!* SOYLENT RED.

[Nomad]

As was noted in the comments.... the guy who Tweeted that video left out one important point... the type of cancer Bloomberg was talking about was prostate cancer which is a slow growing cancer.

At 95 years old, the patient would be more likely to die of old age before the cancer killed him.

More of the usual rwnj scare tactics.

[ziggy]

As was noted in the comments.... the guy who Tweeted that video left out one important point... the type of cancer Bloomberg was talking about was prostate cancer which is a slow growing cancer.

At 95 years old, the patient would be more likely to die of old age before the cancer killed him.

More of the usual rwnj scare tactics.

He says "We got to sit here and say which things we're going to do and which things we are not" and then uses prostate cancer in 95 year old as an example of one of the things. What other treatments does he want to deny to keep it from going bankrupt? Just denying 95 year old men prostate cancer treatment isn't going to do it.

[Jack]

Which is MORE important, ... taking care of old, dying people, or young, productive people with families to support?

[RB 60]

Which is MORE important, ... taking care of old, dying people, or young, productive people with families to support?

Who took care of them before they (supposedly) became productive people? Weren't we young and productive with families to support at one time?

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

As was noted in the comments.... the guy who Tweeted that video left out one important point... the type of cancer Bloomberg was talking about was prostate cancer which is a slow growing cancer.

At 95 years old, the patient would be more likely to die of old age before the cancer killed him.

More of the usual rwnj scare tactics.

oh ok.

it's more like you globalist enviro murderers want to kill everyone.

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

overprescription of youth in asia.

[Jack]

Who took care of them before they (supposedly) became productive people? Weren't we young and productive with families to support at one time?

Yes. The point I was making "Is were do you get the Biggest Bang for the Buck?"
On the 95 year old, or on the 22 year old.

[RB 60]

Yes. The point I was making "Is were do you get the Biggest Bang for the Buck?"
On the 95 year old, or on the 22 year old.

I guess you've never had parents. I have often thought you were hatched and abandoned....

[StoneByStone]

As was noted in the comments.... the guy who Tweeted that video left out one important point... the type of cancer Bloomberg was talking about was prostate cancer which is a slow growing cancer.

At 95 years old, the patient would be more likely to die of old age before the cancer killed him.

More of the usual rwnj scare tactics.

Still not a fan of this or Bloomberg, but that at least makes more sense.

[Cinnabar]

Fear mongering again. The dreaded death panels have been taken out of the mothballs of the right wing's moldy musty attic.

[Jack]

I guess you've never had parents. I have often thought you were hatched and abandoned....

I think you have missed the point.