Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 79

Thread: More proof of Democrat privilege: Roger Stone railroaded while no charges for McCabe

  1. #61 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    10,720
    Thanks
    1,623
    Thanked 4,770 Times in 3,312 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 166 Times in 157 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by christiefan915 View Post
    Not sure what this deflection means so I'll presume it's your defense of trump's spite and vindictiveness. Unlike you, the Vindman brothers don't feel the need to kiss the hem of trump's garment and justify every stupid thing he does.
    The direct quote of what you said:

    Quote Originally Posted by christiefan915 View Post
    "He has been fired thus far..." Is that the RWNJ way of saying he was reassigned to another department? And his brother was fired too, because?
    Sorry you can't follow a straightforward conversation long enough to realize that the NY Times calling Vindman "fired" makes a laughing stock of you misrepresenting the use of the word "fired" as "right-wing," but perhaps working on your reading comprehension skills for a while before coming back and trying this brain teaser that is paying attention from post to post will help.


  2. #62 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    10,720
    Thanks
    1,623
    Thanked 4,770 Times in 3,312 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 166 Times in 157 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anatta View Post
    Napolitano: Roger Stone 'absolutely entitled' to new trial after juror's tweets revealed
    https://thehill.com/homenews/media/4...l-after-jurors
    “[Stone is] absolutely entitled to a new trial with a member of a jury making these types of revelations about the politics involved in the decisions to prosecute him,” Napolitano said on “Fox & Friends."

    “It is the duty of the judge to ensure that both the government and defendant get a fair trial, and if the judge discovers afterward that there was a built-in inherent bias on the part of a member of a jury against the defendant, that is an automatic trigger for a new trial,” he later explained. “[U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson is] going to have to call those jurors back in and interrogate them or make a decision on the spot.

    ~~
    In January 2019, Hart also sent a since-deleted tweet of Stone's arrest in a pre-dawn raid in Florida while sharing an article outlining his indictment. "Brought to you by the lock her up peanut gallery," Hart wrote.

  3. #63 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    10,720
    Thanks
    1,623
    Thanked 4,770 Times in 3,312 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 166 Times in 157 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    What a stupid thread. Trump has control of all 3 branches of the government. He has his suckup, Barr, heading justice. You can be sure Barr spared no expense trying to nail Mccabe with something, anything at all. He failed because it does not exist.
    McCabe ADMITTED to lying under oath (and did it three separate times) and to illegally leaking invented smear campaign propaganda to stage a treasonous hoax and overthrow an election. The crime is already PROVEN when they ADMIT it you fucking moron.



    You want to take a second and invent another bullshit partisan excuse for the double-standard there, Socrates?

  4. #64 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    73,391
    Thanks
    101,921
    Thanked 54,771 Times in 33,632 Posts
    Groans
    3,155
    Groaned 5,065 Times in 4,683 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arminius View Post
    Except for the article in the post you're responding to. The foreperson provably lied about her biases and the case might be re-tried because of it. Closing your eyes, covering your ears and screaming, "Fake news!" at established facts won't magically make them disappear.

    You have no proof of this, it’s fake news, you cultist believe anything your lying dear leader tells you.

  5. #65 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    5,726
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 3,573 Times in 2,247 Posts
    Groans
    8
    Groaned 161 Times in 153 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arminius View Post
    Jesus. There are TWO of you who can't comprehend that pointing out his fraudulent prosecution isn't arguing that he was forced to commit any crime?

    Morons. Morons everywhere.
    If he tampered with witnesses, his prosecution wasn't fraudulent.

  6. #66 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    10
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    In the republican world these days facts don’t seem to matter only parties do. Clealy McCabe didn’t do anything illegal and Stone did. With Barr leading the justice department, being so hands on and clearly being close with trump if there were charges to be brought they would have been.

  7. #67 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    73,391
    Thanks
    101,921
    Thanked 54,771 Times in 33,632 Posts
    Groans
    3,155
    Groaned 5,065 Times in 4,683 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Badguy View Post
    If he tampered with witnesses, his prosecution wasn't fraudulent.
    Also, if the foreman in his case showed prejudice, the other jurists would have reported her. It’s ridiculous to think one person could manipulate a whole jury.

  8. #68 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    10,720
    Thanks
    1,623
    Thanked 4,770 Times in 3,312 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 166 Times in 157 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    You have no proof of this, it’s fake news, you cultist believe anything your lying dear leader tells you.
    Except for the article you keep trying to pretend away. It's been posted. Lie about it not existing all you want. The facts still show what is claimed.

  9. #69 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    10,720
    Thanks
    1,623
    Thanked 4,770 Times in 3,312 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 166 Times in 157 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Badguy View Post
    If he tampered with witnesses, his prosecution wasn't fraudulent.
    He tried to talk Randy Credico into standing his ground for Trump and resisting what we all now know was a 100% fabricated hoax. That's not witness tampering, even if biased, lying jurors tried to legitimize this BS wishful thinking.



    McCabe, on the other hand, ADMITS to lying under oath, and faces zero days in jail. Hence the point of this thread. Try again.

  10. #70 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    10,720
    Thanks
    1,623
    Thanked 4,770 Times in 3,312 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 166 Times in 157 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheLasOfTheModerates View Post
    In the republican world these days facts don’t seem to matter only parties do.
    Say the people who fell for:

    -the Russia collusion hoax,
    -the "Investigating Biden's corruption is worse than Biden BEING corrupt" hoax,
    -the Covington Catholic hoax,
    -the Roy Moore pedophile hoax,
    -the Kavanaugh rape gang hoax,
    -the "repealing Net Neutrality will destroy the Internet" hoax,
    -the Jussie Smollett hoax,
    -the Charlottesville "very fine people" hoax,
    -the Duke Lacrosse team hoax,
    -the fake Ukraine transcript hoax,
    -the Trayvon Martin hoax,
    -the "Trump admitted to sexual assault" hoax,
    -the "penises cause climate change" hoax,
    -the "uninsured crisis" hoax,
    -the "Trump denying passports to Latinos" hoax,
    -the multitude of college hate crime hoaxes,
    -the "Mission Accomplished" hoax,
    -the "deceptively edited video" Planned Parenthood hoax,
    -the "children in cages" hoax,
    -the Michael Cohen perjury/contacting the Russians hoaxes,
    -the SPLC "hate group" hoax,
    -the "Trump mocking people with disabilities" hoax,
    -the "you can keep your doctor" hoax,
    -the "immigrants are rapists, criminals, animals" hoax,
    -the Kavanaugh "white power symbol" hoax,
    -the "Trump asked Putin to hack the DNC" hoax,
    -the polar bear dying from climate change hoax,
    -the "Trump made it easier for the mentally ill to purchase guns" hoax,
    -the Scaramucci Russian bankers hoax,
    -the "Muslim ban" hoax,
    -the global warming "consensus" hoax,
    -the "Obama's scandal-free presidency" hoax,
    -the Trump Jr. WikiLeaks hoax,
    -the Iran nuclear appeasement hoax,
    -the "polls show Trump will lose" hoax,
    -the "Obamacare will never fund abortions or illegal immigrants" hoax,
    -the "Hillary exonerated" hoax,
    -the "white privilege" hoax,
    -the voter suppression hoax,
    -and the "hands up don't shoot" hoax.



    Quote Originally Posted by TheLasOfTheModerates View Post
    Clealy McCabe didn’t do anything illegal and Stone did.
    Lying under oath isn't illegal but lying under oath is illegal? Nice logic there, Socrates.

  11. #71 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    10,720
    Thanks
    1,623
    Thanked 4,770 Times in 3,312 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 166 Times in 157 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Also, if the foreman in his case showed prejudice, the other jurists would have reported her.
    Bias can only exist if it is openly broadcast to all? Devastating logic.

    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    It’s ridiculous to think one person could manipulate a whole jury.
    That's one juror who might have refused to go along with this fraud if the foreliar had been replaced by someone who WASN'T lying under oath to railroad someone for lying under oath, which is the difference between Stone's conviction and exoneration.

    Try again.

    But hey, at least you've gone from blind denial to the shittiest attempts to defend this hoax ever. That's progress.

  12. #72 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    73,391
    Thanks
    101,921
    Thanked 54,771 Times in 33,632 Posts
    Groans
    3,155
    Groaned 5,065 Times in 4,683 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arminius View Post
    Bias can only exist if it is openly broadcast to all? Devastating logic.



    That's one juror who might have refused to go along with this fraud if the foreliar had been replaced by someone who WASN'T lying under oath to railroad someone for lying under oath, which is the difference between Stone's conviction and exoneration.

    Try again.

    But hey, at least you've gone from blind denial to the shittiest attempts to defend this hoax ever. That's progress.
    You’re an Alice, a cultist, it’s fake news. You believe Trump who lies and then confessed to his lies. You have absolutely no proof of jury bias. Just fake news.

  13. #73 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    10,720
    Thanks
    1,623
    Thanked 4,770 Times in 3,312 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 166 Times in 157 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    You’re an Alice, a cultist, it’s fake news. You believe Trump who lies and then confessed to his lies. You have absolutely no proof of jury bias. Just fake news.
    Except the article already posted. But go on pretending away the facts. That'll save you.



    You were PROGRESSING from blind denial to the worst counterpoints ever. Now you're falling back off the wagon back into pretending away evidence already provided. Guess additions are hard to overcome.

  14. #74 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    52,794
    Thanks
    13,341
    Thanked 22,579 Times in 15,814 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,951 Times in 1,862 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Also, if the foreman in his case showed prejudice, the other jurists would have reported her. It’s ridiculous to think one person could manipulate a whole jury.
    takes 12 to convict, and a foreman is the leader in terms of votes, and settling issues
    ( normally -though there is no written process)

    Verdicts have been overturned due to a biased jury. why are you defending this?
    do you hate Stone as well as Trump?

    It's upto the judge, but the foreman did not disclose her hate/disdain for Trump/Stone.
    Justice demands a new trial

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to anatta For This Post:

    artichoke (02-15-2020)

  16. #75 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    10,720
    Thanks
    1,623
    Thanked 4,770 Times in 3,312 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 166 Times in 157 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anatta View Post
    takes 12 to convict, and a foreman is the leader in terms of votes, and settling issues
    ( normally -though there is no written process)

    Verdicts have been overturned due to a biased jury. why are you defending this?
    do you hate Stone as well as Trump?

    It's upto the judge, but the foreman did not disclose her hate/disdain for Trump/Stone.
    Justice demands a new trial
    Exactly. Facts matter. Democrat feelings don't.

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to artichoke For This Post:

    anatta (02-15-2020)

Similar Threads

  1. Roger Stone.... Guilty
    By Jarod in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 11-15-2019, 12:24 PM
  2. Roger Stone.... Guilty
    By Jarod in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-15-2019, 10:52 AM
  3. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 03-05-2019, 01:59 PM
  4. James Fields (charlottesville) was railroaded. Here's the proof.
    By Text Drivers are Killers in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-17-2018, 12:34 PM
  5. Roger Stone
    By Phantasmal in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 89
    Last Post: 12-05-2018, 11:54 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •