More proof of Democrat privilege: Roger Stone railroaded while no charges for McCabe

[Phantasmal]

Exactly. Facts matter. Democrat feelings don't.

But, Jackson shot down the motion for a new trial, saying the juror's potential bias was not demonstrated -- and even if it were, it wasn't significant enough to warrant the drastic step of calling for a new trial.
Courts allow for a new trial, Jackson noted, when "a serious miscarriage of justice may have occured." Bias is a permissible reason to remove a juror or call for a new trial only in "extreme situations where the relationship between a prospective juror and some aspect of the litigation is such that it is highly unlikely that the average person could remain impartial in his deliberations under the circumstances."

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.fox...cial-media.amp

[Nordberg]

Say the people who fell for:

-the Russia collusion hoax,
-the "Investigating Biden's corruption is worse than Biden BEING corrupt" hoax,
-the Covington Catholic hoax,
-the Roy Moore pedophile hoax,
-the Kavanaugh rape gang hoax,
-the "repealing Net Neutrality will destroy the Internet" hoax,
-the Jussie Smollett hoax,
-the Charlottesville "very fine people" hoax,
-the Duke Lacrosse team hoax,
-the fake Ukraine transcript hoax,
-the Trayvon Martin hoax,
-the "Trump admitted to sexual assault" hoax,
-the "penises cause climate change" hoax,
-the "uninsured crisis" hoax,
-the "Trump denying passports to Latinos" hoax,
-the multitude of college hate crime hoaxes,
-the "Mission Accomplished" hoax,
-the "deceptively edited video" Planned Parenthood hoax,
-the "children in cages" hoax,
-the Michael Cohen perjury/contacting the Russians hoaxes,
-the SPLC "hate group" hoax,
-the "Trump mocking people with disabilities" hoax,
-the "you can keep your doctor" hoax,
-the "immigrants are rapists, criminals, animals" hoax,
-the Kavanaugh "white power symbol" hoax,
-the "Trump asked Putin to hack the DNC" hoax,
-the polar bear dying from climate change hoax,
-the "Trump made it easier for the mentally ill to purchase guns" hoax,
-the Scaramucci Russian bankers hoax,
-the "Muslim ban" hoax,
-the global warming "consensus" hoax,
-the "Obama's scandal-free presidency" hoax,
-the Trump Jr. WikiLeaks hoax,
-the Iran nuclear appeasement hoax,
-the "polls show Trump will lose" hoax,
-the "Obamacare will never fund abortions or illegal immigrants" hoax,
-the "Hillary exonerated" hoax,
-the "white privilege" hoax,
-the voter suppression hoax,
-and the "hands up don't shoot" hoax.





Lying under oath isn't illegal but lying under oath is illegal? Nice logic there, Socrates.

Wow. you are crazier than i thought. In the first fucking place. Mccabe has nothing to do with Stone. They are completely separate. You cannot connect them to create a false link.

[artichoke]

But, Jackson shot down the motion for a new trial, saying the juror's potential bias was not demonstrated -- and even if it were, it wasn't significant enough to warrant the drastic step of calling for a new trial.

Well yeah. Amy Berman Jackson has been exposed as a biased Clinton supporter from the beginning and called on repeatedly to recuse herself for a REASON. Did you miss the point of the thread? The two-tiered justice system?



And the juror's posts are extreme anti-Trump propaganda, and she was posting it WHILE lying to the court about not supporting either side (and one legitimately objective juror in her place would have prevented a conviction). So you have a known biased partisan Democrat hack judge saying that a known biased partisan Democrat hack juror isn't biased.

Imagine that.

[artichoke]

Mccabe has nothing to do with Stone.

He doesn't HAVE to have anything to do with Stone in order to be further proof that elitist DC swamp snobs are held to a completely different standard than everyone else, imbecile.

If this incredibly simple concept is too much of a Rubik's Cube to get your pea brain around, perhaps you should go lay down and eat your crayons while the adults finish their conversation.