"TRUMP RAGEs, screams and swears at staff because his ENEMIES aren't being PROSECUTED

[Grokmaster]

Still bleating about Durham. What was the last one that would send every Dem in the country into exile? I cannot keep them st5raight. Was it rudy withe the amazing stuff he found about Hunter Biden? Was it the investigation before Durham that was guaranteed to find terrible Dem crimes. Will you ever see how you are being lied to and led around by your noses? ..The answer is no. Reds cannot learn. They just end believing one lie and jump full bore into the next.

DURHAM WILL BE THE END OF THE LIESPEAK MYTH OF THE "SCANDAL-FREE OBAMA ADM."

IN SPADES.

COUNT ON IT.

[AProudLefty]

[canceled.2021.2]

He should be mad. They should be prosecuted

Two tier justice system. One for those who supports democrats and the other for conservatives

[Centerleftfl]

DURHAM WILL BE THE END OF THE LIESPEAK MYTH OF THE "SCANDAL-FREE OBAMA ADM."

IN SPADES.

COUNT ON IT.

Get back to us.

[christiefan915]

"WASHINGTON POST REPORT"....

Using the "Alinsky tactic" here, GM?

[christiefan915]

DURHAM WILL BE THE END OF THE LIESPEAK MYTH OF THE "SCANDAL-FREE OBAMA ADM."

IN SPADES.

COUNT ON IT.

And if Durham doesn't give you what you want it'll be years and years of deep-state conspiracies from the right.

[ThatOwlWoman]

YOU keep us posted. Where are the investigations of the Bidens, where are the perp walks.

I'm starting to think that Earl is another sock of Toxic Top's, only with a bit more ability to form semi-coherent sentences. lol

Are you also wondering whatever happened with the much-anticipated "Durham Investigation"? Stretch and others were banking on that to FINALLY expose Hillary, or whatever it was it was supposed to do.

[ThatOwlWoman]

And if Durham doesn't give you what you want it'll be years and years of deep-state conspiracies from the right.

Hahaha... jinx!

[Centerleftfl]

Using the "Alinsky tactic" here, GM?

Ahmyes the BOOGEYMEN! When all else fails, dredge them up. Alinsky, Ayers, Soros, and Wright. Who am I missing?

[christiefan915]

Ahmyes the BOOGEYMEN! When all else fails, dredge them up. Alinsky, Ayers, Soros, and Wright. Who am I missing?

I think that pretty well covers it!

[countryboy]

Same shit, post IMPEACHMENT. More obstruction, more abuse of HIS powers of the office to go after his ENEMIES.

He can DO ANYTHING, he is allowed to do ANYTHING! He can have his enemies arrested, perp walked, indicted and THROWN IN JAILS. He has the power. He can do it. Why wait? Let him find private lawyers with experience in government to do the paperworkand file the charges. The RNC and FEDERALISTS should have at minimum 3 decades of lists of people on how to do it. Guiliani has all that FED experience (okay that was a JOKE).

Every single cited 'CASE' below made it to this board with drooling expectations, the same SHARED BY TRUMP. TRUMP's DOJ knew there was not going be any charges filed after what 4 investigations? Think about it!


Trump raged and swore at aides because his enemies aren’t being prosecuted: report



Published
6 hours ago on
February 14, 2020
By Cody Fenwick, AlterNet

There are two key ways a president can abuse the Justice Department and federal prosecutorial powers: he can protect his friends, and he can go after his enemies.

In recent days and months, especially with developments around the Michael Flynn and Roger Stone cases, observers have been deeply concerned that President Donald Trump is engaging in the first kind of abuse. But according to a new report from the Washington Post, what Trump really cares about — and what he is really furious hasn’t happened yet — is the prosecution of his enemies.

The report explained:

Behind that public fight, according to people familiar with the discussions, is a deeper tension between Trump and Barr’s Justice Department over the lack of criminal charges against former FBI director James B. Comey and those close to him.

The flare-up over the Stone case comes against a backdrop of growing behind-the-scenes anger from the president toward the Justice Department — more about whom the department has not charged with crimes than about whom it has charged, according to people familiar with the discussions

Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz referred Comey’s handling of the memos to prosecutors for possible criminal prosecution, but lawyers quickly determined it was not a close call and did not seek to build a case.

That sent Trump into a rage, according to people briefed on his comments. He complained so loudly and swore so frequently in the Oval Office that some of his aides discussed it for days, these people said. Trump repeatedly said that Comey deserved to be charged, according to their account.

“Can you [expletive] believe they didn’t charge him?” Trump said on the night of the decision, these people said.

It’s not just Comey. The report noted that Trump has also been eager to see charges against Comey’s former deputy, Andrew McCabe. And Trump also reportedly became enraged when the Washington Post reported in January that U.S. Attorney John Huber’s investigation into vague allegations about Hillary Clinton came up dry. (Trump had asked former Attorney General Jeff Sessions to look into Clinton, according to former Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report.)

The Post continued:

Separately, Barr has tapped U.S. Attorney John Durham in Connecticut to investigate whether any crimes were committed by FBI and CIA officials in the pursuit of allegations in 2016 that Russia interfered in the election to benefit Trump’s campaign.

After learning that the Huber investigation is not likely to produce charges, Trump has become more insistent that Durham finish his work soon, according to people familiar with the discussions. Trump, these people said, wants to be able to use whatever Durham finds as a cudgel in his reelection campaign.

All of that frustration has fed into the public fight over the Stone case.

What’s not clear from the report is how much Trump has directly expressed this anger and desire for prosecutions to Barr himself. On Thursday, Barr claimed in an interview with ABC News that Trump hasn’t asked him to do anything in a criminal case. It’s not clear if that’s true — but even if Trump hasn’t made his demands explicit to Barr, there’s no doubt the attorney general knows what’s expected of him.


https://www.<b><font size="7"><font ...ecuted-report/

.....according to people briefed on his comments....

Which people?

[Centerleftfl]

.....according to people briefed on his comments....

Which people?

The same kind of ANONYMOUS sources that went back for DECADES, maybe centuries. Deep Throat ring a bell? All the INFORMATION leaked was accurate, checked out 45 years later, from numerous books including his OWN. Is that what you are afraid of? It will all CHECK OUT?

Trump was going to SUE Anonymous. How's that case going? How about those cases against his SEXUALLY ASSAULTED? He is suing them (or was it bluster because even HE knew not to go there).

Do you know that TRUMP has never won a case against an AUTHOR telling his story? I believe there have been 2 or 3. One went on for years, he was the most aggrieved about it and the AUTHOR won.

What else you got?

[countryboy]

The same kind of ANONYMOUS sources that went back for DECADES, maybe centuries. Deep Throat ring a bell? All the INFORMATION leaked was accurate, checked out 45 years later, from numerous books including his OWN. Is that what you are afraid of? It will all CHECK OUT?

Trump was going to SUE Anonymous. How's that case going? How about those cases against his SEXUALLY ASSAULTED? He is suing them (or was it bluster because even HE knew not to go there).

Do you know that TRUMP has never won a case against an AUTHOR telling his story? I believe there have been 2 or 3. One went on for years, he was the most aggrieved about it and the AUTHOR won.

What else you got?

Nonsense. Anonymous sources have never been used to the extent they are today. Furthermore, back then, many of their stories later proved accurate. That is not the case today. How many "walls closing in" stories went down in flames after the Meuller investigation went kaput? Nobody but gullible dupes like you believe this shit anymore.

[Centerleftfl]

Nonsense. Anonymous sources have never been used to the extent they are today. Furthermore, back then, many of their stories later proved accurate. That is not the case today. How many "walls closing in" stories went down in flames after the Meuller investigation went kaput? Nobody but gullible dupes like you believe this shit anymore.

Because you say so? Or because TRUMP does? You people don't even try anymore.

[countryboy]

Because you say so? Or because TRUMP does? You people don't even try anymore.

Answer the question, how many fake news stories went down in flames after the Mueller investigation? And that's just a single example.