Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 84

Thread: Barr to testify before House Judiciary Committee

  1. #31 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    14,055
    Thanks
    2,436
    Thanked 8,812 Times in 6,202 Posts
    Groans
    568
    Groaned 493 Times in 469 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Makes one wonder why, everybody knows Barr will lie his ass off to cover Trump, you are going to see a lot of Barr's usual, "repeat the question," "I don't understand the question," "what does suggest mean," "I don't remember," and of course the predictable Executive privilege catch all, waste of time

    Also, don't be suprised if Trump kills his appearance, from experience, the last thing Trump wants is any of his ass kissers taking questions under oath, even Barr
    Translation, holy crap Marie, Barr will make Nadless and Shifferbrainz look like complete idiots.
    Every life matters

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to countryboy For This Post:

    Grokmaster (02-12-2020), Truth Detector (02-12-2020)

  3. #32 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,245
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,243 Times in 13,968 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,056 Times in 2,851 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grokmaster View Post

    OTHER THAN THE BLATANT COVERUPS of FAST N FURIOUS, URANIUM ONE, THE SUBSEQUENT ILLEGAL RUSSIAN EXPORTING OF YELLOWCAKE AFTER URANIUM ONE, THE IRS TARGTING, THE HILLARY CRIMES, BENGHAZI, , ETC., ETC.. YEAH, SURE...
    ANOTHER ONE WHO CAN NEVER BACK UP ANYTHING HE POSTS NO MATTER HOW MANY TIMES HE CAPITALIZES IT OR PUTS IT IN BOLD LETTERS

  4. #33 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Delray Beach FL
    Posts
    115,590
    Thanks
    125,219
    Thanked 27,477 Times in 22,782 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 3,245 Times in 2,985 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Why do I always have to explain the obvious to "truthie?"
    Why do you always have to look like a moron?

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    "Allegations of “collusion” were not “proven false” in the Mueller investigation, nor was the issue of “collusion” addressed in the report.
    The report makes clear the investigation did not assess whether “collusion” occurred because it is not a legal term."
    https://apnews.com/f9c0ab20229140f18ea34e1f15a9f597
    Yes, they were. Mueller clearly stated: Mueller Report; Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Trump critics pointed to multiple instances of those contacts between Trump campaign officials and Russia as evidence of “collusion,” a term that Mueller points out in his report has no legal application, but nevertheless colloquially encompasses the kinds of possible violations he examined."
    https://www.rollcall.com/2019/04/18/...nd-doesnt-say/
    Yet Mueller stated: Mueller Report; Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    The term, “collusion” is not a legal term and the report made no finding on that issue, one way or the other"
    https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevede.../#18ff1e937836
    Yet Mueller stated: Mueller Report; Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Billy Barr lied, which is why he had to get out infront of the public review of the report
    Again, what lie? You keep bloviating the same stupid shit without any factual support.
    "When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."


    A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
    Author: Booker T. Washington



    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    Unless you just can't stand the idea of "ni**ers" teaching white kids.


    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Address the topic, not other posters.

  5. #34 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Delray Beach FL
    Posts
    115,590
    Thanks
    125,219
    Thanked 27,477 Times in 22,782 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 3,245 Times in 2,985 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    ANOTHER ONE WHO CAN NEVER BACK UP ANYTHING HE POSTS NO MATTER HOW MANY TIMES HE CAPITALIZES IT OR PUTS IT IN BOLD LETTERS
    Buy a mirror hack; you just described yourself.
    "When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."


    A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
    Author: Booker T. Washington



    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    Unless you just can't stand the idea of "ni**ers" teaching white kids.


    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Address the topic, not other posters.

  6. #35 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,245
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,243 Times in 13,968 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,056 Times in 2,851 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by countryboy View Post
    Translation, holy crap Marie, Barr will make Nadless and Shifferbrainz look like complete idiots.
    You mean like he did infront of the Senate with his endless "I don't remember," "I don't understand the question," "could you repeat that," "it depends upon how you define suppose," "I am not at liberty to answer that," and the usual executive privilege rant. Although the lengthy filibustering with sophomoric legalities though is entertaining, especially when he throws in a little orchestrated moral indignation, but overall, a waste of time, he'll never offers a straight answer, might as well call Don Draper to testify

    As I said, don't understand why they even bother

  7. #36 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,245
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,243 Times in 13,968 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,056 Times in 2,851 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Truth Detector View Post
    Why do you always have to look like a moron?



    Yes, they were. Mueller clearly stated: Mueller Report; Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.



    Yet Mueller stated: Mueller Report; Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.



    Yet Mueller stated: Mueller Report; Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.



    Again, what lie? You keep bloviating the same stupid shit without any factual support.
    Interesting, not a single source for any of the quotes, what a surprise

  8. #37 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Delray Beach FL
    Posts
    115,590
    Thanks
    125,219
    Thanked 27,477 Times in 22,782 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 3,245 Times in 2,985 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Interesting, not a single source for any of the quotes, what a surprise
    They are in the Mueller Report you dumb fuck. Good lord; and you wonder why we call you a dumb fuck.
    "When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."


    A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
    Author: Booker T. Washington



    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    Unless you just can't stand the idea of "ni**ers" teaching white kids.


    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Address the topic, not other posters.

  9. #38 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Delray Beach FL
    Posts
    115,590
    Thanks
    125,219
    Thanked 27,477 Times in 22,782 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 3,245 Times in 2,985 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    You mean like he did infront of the Senate with his endless "I don't remember," "I don't understand the question," "could you repeat that," "it depends upon how you define suppose," "I am not at liberty to answer that," and the usual executive privilege rant. Although the lengthy filibustering with sophomoric legalities though is entertaining, especially when he throws in a little orchestrated moral indignation, but overall, a waste of time, he'll never offers a straight answer, might as well call Don Draper to testify

    As I said, don't understand why they even bother
    When you are asked really stupid questions that are leading, you get answers like that you clueless twit.
    "When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."


    A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
    Author: Booker T. Washington



    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    Unless you just can't stand the idea of "ni**ers" teaching white kids.


    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Address the topic, not other posters.

  10. #39 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    6,130
    Thanks
    17,822
    Thanked 3,245 Times in 2,336 Posts
    Groans
    97
    Groaned 162 Times in 151 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Don't get your hopes up there "DO," at best, Shifty and gonadler's "investigations" will hang some low level bureaucrat out to dry, their purpose isn't to prosecute anyone, that is too opened and closed, rather to create enough gray area so the likes of rachel madcow and such can run with endless inneundos till after the election. The timing will tell it all, I predict right before or during the Democrat Convention, or if biden or bloomberg has another major blunder, then he will need the deflection
    FTFY, oh, and be careful with making a big deal out of this. I wouldn't be too surprised if Trump just pardoned him. What could happen? You guys will get madder?
    “The Communist party must control the guns.”
    ― Mao Tse-tung



    “Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything.”-Generally attributed to Uncle Joe Stalin



    “Everything under heaven is in utter choas; the situation is excellent.”
    ― mao tse-tung

  11. #40 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    30,645
    Thanks
    18,222
    Thanked 15,646 Times in 10,702 Posts
    Groans
    202
    Groaned 618 Times in 607 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by countryboy View Post
    Translation, holy crap Marie, Barr will make Nadless and Shifferbrainz look like complete idiots.
    Without a doubt...
    TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..


    De Oppresso Liber

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Grokmaster For This Post:

    countryboy (02-12-2020)

  13. #41 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,245
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,243 Times in 13,968 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,056 Times in 2,851 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Truth Detector View Post
    Why do you always have to look like a moron?



    Yes, they were. Mueller clearly stated: Mueller Report; Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.



    Yet Mueller stated: Mueller Report; Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.



    Yet Mueller stated: Mueller Report; Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.

    Again, what lie? You keep bloviating the same stupid shit without any factual support.
    And again I have to educate him, page #2 of the Mueller Report:

    "In evaluating whether evidence about collective action of multiple individuals constituted
    a crime, we applied the framework of conspiracy law, not the concept of “collusion.” In so doing,
    the Office recognized that the word “collud[e]” was used in communications with the Acting
    Attorney General confirming certain aspects of the investigation’s scope and that the term has
    frequently been invoked in public reporting about the investigation. But collusion is not a specific
    offense or theory of liability found in the United States Code, nor is it a term of art in federal
    criminal law.
    For those reasons, the Office’s focus in analyzing questions of joint criminal liability
    was on conspiracy as defined in federal law"

    Yet billy barr said it proved no collusion, even thought Mueller specified at the offset he wasn't looking to prove collusion

    You want to tell us again there "truthie" that the legal understanding of collusion isn't a nebulous term?

  14. #42 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    30,645
    Thanks
    18,222
    Thanked 15,646 Times in 10,702 Posts
    Groans
    202
    Groaned 618 Times in 607 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    ANOTHER ONE WHO CAN NEVER BACK UP ANYTHING HE POSTS NO MATTER HOW MANY TIMES HE CAPITALIZES IT OR PUTS IT IN BOLD LETTERS
    BY ALL MEANS, SHOW US THE DOJ RESOLUTION FOR EVERYTHING I POSTED....LIAR.

    WHO WAS PROSECUTED FOR FAST n FURIOUS?? NO ONE. WHO WAS PROSECUTED FOR URANIUM ONE and the SUBSEQUENT ALLOWED ILLEGAL EXPORTS OF YELLOWCAKE? NO ONE. WHO WAS PROSECUTED FOR THE IRS TARGETTING? NO ONE. WHO WAS PROSECUTED FOR THE MONUMENTAL FALIURES, THEN , LIES ( "It was the video!!" ) ABOUT BENGHAZI? NO ONE. WHO WAS PROSECUTED WHEN HILLARY KNOWINGLY DESTROYED 33,000 SUBPOENEAD EMAILS and DEVICES, AS WELL AS LIED TO CONGRESS? NO ONE.
    TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..


    De Oppresso Liber

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Grokmaster For This Post:

    Truth Detector (02-12-2020)

  16. #43 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    30,645
    Thanks
    18,222
    Thanked 15,646 Times in 10,702 Posts
    Groans
    202
    Groaned 618 Times in 607 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    And again I have to educate him, page #2 of the Mueller Report:

    "In evaluating whether evidence about collective action of multiple individuals constituted
    a crime, we applied the framework of conspiracy law, not the concept of “collusion.” In so doing,
    the Office recognized that the word “collud[e]” was used in communications with the Acting
    Attorney General confirming certain aspects of the investigation’s scope and that the term has
    frequently been invoked in public reporting about the investigation. But collusion is not a specific
    offense or theory of liability found in the United States Code, nor is it a term of art in federal
    criminal law.
    For those reasons, the Office’s focus in analyzing questions of joint criminal liability
    was on conspiracy as defined in federal law"

    Yet billy barr said it proved no collusion, even thought Mueller specified at the offset he wasn't looking to prove collusion

    You want to tell us again there "truthie" that the legal understanding of collusion isn't a nebulous term?
    THEN THE ACCUSATIONS OF "COLLUSION" WERE BULLSHIT FROM THE START.
    TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..


    De Oppresso Liber

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to Grokmaster For This Post:

    Truth Detector (02-12-2020)

  18. #44 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,245
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,243 Times in 13,968 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,056 Times in 2,851 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Truth Detector View Post
    When you are asked really stupid questions that are leading, you get answers like that you clueless twit.
    Oh, so I guess any question ever asked of Barr by anyone who doesn't kiss Trump's ass has to be a stupid question, what a surprise

  19. #45 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,245
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,243 Times in 13,968 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,056 Times in 2,851 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grokmaster View Post
    THEN THE ACCUSATIONS OF "COLLUSION" WERE BULLSHIT FROM THE START.
    I don't ask Trump's Justice Department, they are the ones who appointed Mueller, actually, a Trump appointee in his Justice Dept at that

Similar Threads

  1. House Judiciary Committee announces first impeachment hearing
    By anatta in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-27-2019, 03:13 AM
  2. Move to remove Nadler from House Judiciary Committee.
    By MAGA MAN in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-25-2019, 10:19 PM
  3. BREAKING: Nadler to have Mueller testify in front of Judiciary Committee
    By reagansghost in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 04-12-2019, 03:42 PM
  4. HOUSE JUDICIARY CHAIR CALLS ON MUELLER TO TESTIFY BEFORE COMMITTEE
    By reagansghost in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 04-08-2019, 03:04 PM
  5. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-22-2018, 01:58 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •