GOP Senate blocks 3 election security bills.

[Truth Detector]

the republican party has cheated in elections now for decades

[Truth Detector]

because like many courts have said, its merely a cover for republican party election cheating

[Truth Detector]

Voting ID laws to ensure integrity are one thing. Laws aimed at voter suppression are something else entirely.

Claiming that voter ID laws suppress voters is moronic and a false claim.

[Truth Detector]

a russo bot hole folks

[Truth Detector]

the Russians are working hard to get trumps tiny rancid dick inflated enough for republican to suck it some more

[evince]

truth defector loves it when trumpy allows him to lick the dirt off his dick after he tries to fuck the 18th hole at Mara Largo

[evince]

how many crimes will trump commit ?


as many as the republican party can cover for him to commit

[Gonzomin]

Can you guess who blocking these bills will help? Can you? It is not the Democratic Party. I wonder who? Would the Reds stop potential Dem voters to help them in the elections? That would be cheating. It cannot be them taking away people's right to vote, can it?

[ThatOwlWoman]

Phot oIDs...everyone should have one to vote...
....then they have them for the countless other reasons they're necessary...win, win, win!

I do not have a phot oID... where do we get one? Or are those only available in limited areas? Do you show yours when buying groceries?

So much winning:

[ThatOwlWoman]

The block, led by Freshman Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-Tn) and staunch supporter of Trump, seems a bit odd considering the Republican's claim of "patriotism".
Then again, they may simply be concerned about the outcome of the November election WITHOUT foreign interference.

Well, I'll be darned. And here we have been told that the (R)s want voter ID and other measures to make sure no one can vote illegally so we'll all stay "free." I wonder if maybe they really don't care about election security. Kind of looks that way, eh?

[Celticguy]

The bills have nothing to do with election security. Thats why they are being opposed.

[MAGA MAN]

Too funny Democrats pretending that they care about election security. Hillary's warriors wrote software to rig the Iowa caucus and George Soros paid for it.

[archives]

The block, led by Freshman Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-Tn) and staunch supporter of Trump, seems a bit odd considering the Republican's claim of "patriotism".
Then again, they may simply be concerned about the outcome of the November election WITHOUT foreign interference.

Moscow Mitch is back to work

One of the bills made it a law to contact the FBI or FEC if any foreign entity contacted a campaign offering assistence or information, so you know right away Mitch per Trump's orders wasn't going to touch that one

The other banned connecting voting machines directly to the Internet, which makes zero sense in rejecting, well, unless, use your imagination

The third was for additional funding to States to secure the election, another logical move

And the main GOP "reason" for supposedly opposing these bills was that it would take elections out of the hands of local authorities and put it in a Federal beaurcracy, like the FBI or FEC, whose job it is to safeguard elections rather than some politicians sister in law at the local Board of Elections

Mitch didn't go there because he knew sending any measure to the White House even mentioning election security would upset Donny

[TTQ64]

the republican party has cheated in elections now for decades



now they feel so impowered that they don't even try to hide that they cheat in elections anymore

and yet you want to bring them into the democrat party..........smh

[PostmodernProphet]

Now, to answer your "apples and oranges" comparison, there is a BIG difference in domestic voting issues and foreign interference.
Voting ID laws to ensure integrity are one thing. Laws aimed at voter suppression are something else entirely.

so you're in favor of domestic interference but not foreign interference?......