Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 82

Thread: And the news keeps getting worse for the democrat party

  1. #46 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Ventura CA
    Posts
    81,050
    Thanks
    96,388
    Thanked 18,159 Times in 15,233 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 2,899 Times in 2,641 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FastLane View Post
    The Dems presented their evidence for their "lock solid case" of a case their 17 witnesses were evaluated. The Senate decided the House did not prove their case. Now perhaps if the House had not been so sloppy with making their case things might have turned out different. You only have Adam Schiff, Pelosi, and Nadler to blame. Not the Senate.
    ...or rushed. But seriously; there was NOTHING to this lie filled narrative and when Trump released the transcript, Schiff was too stupid to retreat.

    Nadler: ‘Evidence is undisputed’ for impeachment"
    Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.

    Eric Holder: ďIím still enjoying what Iím doing, thereís still work to be done,Ē Iím still the Presidentís wing-man, so Iím there with my boy.Ē



  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Truth Detector For This Post:

    Grokmaster (02-12-2020)

  3. #47 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    15,068
    Thanks
    451
    Thanked 2,637 Times in 2,141 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,008 Times in 919 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FastLane View Post
    The Dems presented their evidence for their "lock solid case" of a case their 17 witnesses were evaluated. The Senate decided the House did not prove their case. Now perhaps if the House had not been so sloppy with making their case things might have turned out different. You only have Adam Schiff, Pelosi, and Nadler to blame. Not the Senate.
    Bullshit. The Republicans admitted the opposite. They claimed that the point was made and further witnesses weren't needed, but Trump still shouldn't be removed.
    So in other words, they didn't need further witnesses because they knew Trump tried to cheat, but he's a Republican, so they don't care.

    Now if you were right, if the case wasn't proven, then that means they should have heard from Bolton and Parnas because they were presenting new evidence. So really, there's no way to spin this story that makes the Republicans look good. Either they knew Trump was guilty, but don't care, or they don't know if Trump is guilty, but don't want to here evidence so that they can keep living in ignorance. Kind of reminds me of how Hitler would tell Himmler that he didn't want to know what was going on in the concentration camps.

  4. #48 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Federal Way, WA
    Posts
    60,610
    Thanks
    16,539
    Thanked 16,160 Times in 12,062 Posts
    Groans
    625
    Groaned 1,048 Times in 994 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    Bullshit. The Republicans admitted the opposite. They claimed that the point was made and further witnesses weren't needed, but Trump still shouldn't be removed.
    So in other words, they didn't need further witnesses because they knew Trump tried to cheat, but he's a Republican, so they don't care.

    Now if you were right, if the case wasn't proven, then that means they should have heard from Bolton and Parnas because they were presenting new evidence. So really, there's no way to spin this story that makes the Republicans look good. Either they knew Trump was guilty, but don't care, or they don't know if Trump is guilty, but don't want to here evidence so that they can keep living in ignorance. Kind of reminds me of how Hitler would tell Himmler that he didn't want to know what was going on in the concentration camps.
    They argued that the House made its own case, in that it interviewed witnesses and delivered the Senate articles of impeachment.

  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bull Durham For This Post:

    Grokmaster (02-12-2020), Truth Detector (02-12-2020)

  6. #49 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    50,341
    Thanks
    422
    Thanked 8,424 Times in 7,243 Posts
    Groans
    28
    Groaned 447 Times in 436 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    Bullshit. The Republicans admitted the opposite. They claimed that the point was made and further witnesses weren't needed, but Trump still shouldn't be removed.
    So in other words, they didn't need further witnesses because they knew Trump tried to cheat, but he's a Republican, so they don't care.

    Now if you were right, if the case wasn't proven, then that means they should have heard from Bolton and Parnas because they were presenting new evidence. So really, there's no way to spin this story that makes the Republicans look good. Either they knew Trump was guilty, but don't care, or they don't know if Trump is guilty, but don't want to here evidence so that they can keep living in ignorance. Kind of reminds me of how Hitler would tell Himmler that he didn't want to know what was going on in the concentration camps.
    Democrats claimed they had overwhelming evidence of guilt. When they realize they had no such thing, they started calling for the Senate to do what they clearly failed to do in the House.

    Don't like the result, tough shit. Talk to Nancy's peons in the House that did such a poor job they should have prepared better.

  7. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CFM For This Post:

    Grokmaster (02-12-2020), Truth Detector (02-12-2020)

  8. #50 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    7,368
    Thanks
    2,648
    Thanked 2,856 Times in 1,965 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 591 Times in 542 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    The House was anything but sloppy.

    We have a president who refuses to obey the law or act with American values.
    Russian trolls and their supporters go on Ignore, automatically: no second chance.


  9. The Following User Says Thank You to jimmymccready For This Post:

    M. V. Mason (02-12-2020)

  10. #51 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Ventura CA
    Posts
    81,050
    Thanks
    96,388
    Thanked 18,159 Times in 15,233 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 2,899 Times in 2,641 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    Bullshit. The Republicans admitted the opposite. They claimed that the point was made and further witnesses weren't needed, but Trump still shouldn't be removed.
    So in other words, they didn't need further witnesses because they knew Trump tried to cheat, but he's a Republican, so they don't care.

    Now if you were right, if the case wasn't proven, then that means they should have heard from Bolton and Parnas because they were presenting new evidence. So really, there's no way to spin this story that makes the Republicans look good. Either they knew Trump was guilty, but don't care, or they don't know if Trump is guilty, but don't want to here evidence so that they can keep living in ignorance. Kind of reminds me of how Hitler would tell Himmler that he didn't want to know what was going on in the concentration camps.
    In 1999, Democrats in the Senate refused to convict BillyBob Clinton for Obstruction of Justice and Perjury he admitted to, REAL crimes. The notion that leftists who defended the corrupt rot that is the Party of the Jackass can now lecture ANYONE on what is right is laughably stupid and inept.

    Obstruction of Congress and Maladministration are NOT impeachable crimes, will never be impeachable crimes and one has to be a low IQ, uneducated dumbass to even make such moronic arguments.

    So if Nadler argued that impeaching Clinton for REAL crimes was lowering the standard, WTF does he think he just did without any real crimes????

    Good lord; leftists give new meaning to the words, gullible lemmings.
    Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.

    Eric Holder: ďIím still enjoying what Iím doing, thereís still work to be done,Ē Iím still the Presidentís wing-man, so Iím there with my boy.Ē



  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Truth Detector For This Post:

    Grokmaster (02-12-2020)

  12. #52 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Ventura CA
    Posts
    81,050
    Thanks
    96,388
    Thanked 18,159 Times in 15,233 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 2,899 Times in 2,641 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jimmymccready View Post
    The House was anything but sloppy.
    We have a president who refuses to obey the law or act with American values.
    Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.

    Eric Holder: ďIím still enjoying what Iím doing, thereís still work to be done,Ē Iím still the Presidentís wing-man, so Iím there with my boy.Ē



  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Truth Detector For This Post:

    Grokmaster (02-12-2020)

  14. #53 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    15,068
    Thanks
    451
    Thanked 2,637 Times in 2,141 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,008 Times in 919 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    Democrats claimed they had overwhelming evidence of guilt.
    They did, but that's beside the point. In a trial, you try to get as much relevant evidence as possible. Unless it's a shame trial, then evidence and facts don't matter. That's why I knew the Republicans were going to block witnesses and documents.

  15. #54 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    2,115
    Thanks
    223
    Thanked 1,136 Times in 734 Posts
    Groans
    12
    Groaned 142 Times in 129 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Truth Detector View Post
    I don't think it is possible to re-educate indoctrinated morons.
    I know for a fact that it's not possible to educate a blob of bullshit.

  16. #55 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    50,341
    Thanks
    422
    Thanked 8,424 Times in 7,243 Posts
    Groans
    28
    Groaned 447 Times in 436 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    They did, but that's beside the point. In a trial, you try to get as much relevant evidence as possible. Unless it's a shame trial, then evidence and facts don't matter. That's why I knew the Republicans were going to block witnesses and documents.
    Apparently not since after all the witnesses they called claiming they had overwhelming evidence, they demanded the Senate do what they clearly didn't do.

    Nowhere in the definition of trial is the word witnesses. It says examination of evidence.

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to CFM For This Post:

    Truth Detector (02-13-2020)

  18. #56 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    22,049
    Thanks
    2,471
    Thanked 6,574 Times in 5,409 Posts
    Groans
    439
    Groaned 1,049 Times in 1,024 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    History will record,the Senate didn't hold a trial,and that outside of Romney.
    Every Republican Senator was a coward.
    Melchizedek

  19. #57 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    5,561
    Thanks
    2,428
    Thanked 4,293 Times in 2,681 Posts
    Groans
    88
    Groaned 863 Times in 755 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    Bullshit. The Republicans admitted the opposite. They claimed that the point was made and further witnesses weren't needed, but Trump still shouldn't be removed.
    So in other words, they didn't need further witnesses because they knew Trump tried to cheat, but he's a Republican, so they don't care.

    Now if you were right, if the case wasn't proven, then that means they should have heard from Bolton and Parnas because they were presenting new evidence. So really, there's no way to spin this story that makes the Republicans look good. Either they knew Trump was guilty, but don't care, or they don't know if Trump is guilty, but don't want to here evidence so that they can keep living in ignorance. Kind of reminds me of how Hitler would tell Himmler that he didn't want to know what was going on in the concentration camps.
    It's not merely because he's a RepubliCon...it's because the criminal will sign any shit they put in front of his repulsive orange face. He needs them to help him stay in office in order for him to stay out of prison.
    BLUEXIT
    A Modest Proposal For Separating Blue States From Red

    Dear Red-State Trump Voter,
    Letís face it, guys: Weíre done.


    It is a tragedy that so much of the work that so many men and women toiled at for so long to make this a better country, and a better world, has been thrown away, leaving us all in such needless peril.

    This is why our separation in all but name is necessary.


    https://newrepublic.com/article/1409...mp-red-america

  20. #58 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    15,068
    Thanks
    451
    Thanked 2,637 Times in 2,141 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,008 Times in 919 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    Apparently not since after all the witnesses they called claiming they had overwhelming evidence, they demanded the Senate do what they clearly didn't do.

    Nowhere in the definition of trial is the word witnesses. It says examination of evidence.
    Testimonies from witnesses are, obviously, considered evidence.
    While they did have overwhelming evidence, it's beside the point. In a trial, you gather as much relevant information as possible. Unless the trial is a sham, that is.

  21. #59 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    34,340
    Thanks
    692
    Thanked 3,322 Times in 2,518 Posts
    Groans
    5
    Groaned 226 Times in 207 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    Testimonies from witnesses are, obviously, considered evidence.
    While they did have overwhelming evidence, it's beside the point. In a trial, you gather as much relevant information as possible. Unless the trial is a sham, that is.
    but all evidence is not testimony. and even testimony is only evidence if it isn't hearsay.

    you're fucking up with your arguments right now.
    Morality is a set of attitudes and behaviors which facilitate voluntary, cooperative and mutually beneficial relationships. --AssHatZombie

    "Men think in herds, go mad in herds, but recover their senses one by one." -- Charles Mackay

    "AssHat rocks and is fun to have around." -- Damocles

  22. The Following User Says Thank You to AssHatZombie For This Post:

    Truth Detector (02-13-2020)

  23. #60 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    50,341
    Thanks
    422
    Thanked 8,424 Times in 7,243 Posts
    Groans
    28
    Groaned 447 Times in 436 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    Testimonies from witnesses are, obviously, considered evidence.
    While they did have overwhelming evidence, it's beside the point. In a trial, you gather as much relevant information as possible. Unless the trial is a sham, that is.
    The House called their witnesses. If they didn't do a good job, it's not a sham if someone else doesn't do what someone else wants them to do.

    The claim of overwhelming evidence is the point.

    In a trial, by definition, you examine the evidence.

    Trump is acquitted and there isn't a goddamn thing you can do about it is whine like the rest of the nigger lovers whose boy left in 2017 and who got their ass kicked in the 2016 election.

  24. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CFM For This Post:

    Grokmaster (02-12-2020), Truth Detector (02-13-2020)

Similar Threads

  1. BREAKING NEWS: Top democrat party witness is FAKE NEWS
    By Corona Virus in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-15-2019, 06:38 AM
  2. APP - Bad news for democrat party
    By Teflon Don in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-02-2018, 06:53 AM
  3. APP - Great news for the democrat party
    By Teflon Don in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-13-2018, 05:39 AM
  4. The Democrat Party Is in Worse Shape Than You Thought
    By Dark Soul in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-09-2017, 05:25 PM
  5. It keeps getting worse for the democrat party
    By I Love America in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-25-2016, 02:48 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •