artichoke (02-11-2020), Truth Detector (02-11-2020)
Don't get all giddy there friend, this was one of many lawsuits in the Courts regarding Trump's finances, and it was probably the weakest, it came out of the prior Court with a split decision, none of this will be over until the New York case involving Grand Jury requests hits the SCOTUS
BLUEXITA Modest Proposal For Separating Blue States From Red
Dear Red-State Trump Voter,
Let’s face it, guys: We’re done.
It is a tragedy that so much of the work that so many men and women toiled at for so long to make this a better country, and a better world, has been thrown away, leaving us all in such needless peril.
This is why our separation in all but name is necessary.
https://newrepublic.com/article/1409...mp-red-america
Step 1: Falsely accuse your victim of everything under the Sun, hoping that something will stick.
Step 2: When wave-after-wave of your McCarthyite witch hunts, coup attempts, and hoaxes all fall apart under serious scrutiny, respond by inventing more conspiracy theories.
Attachment 14194
Darth Omar (02-11-2020)
Right. The party that illegally sold foreign governments influence over U.S. policy through the Clinton Foundation, the party of the Biden crime family with all it's foreign bribery, kick backs, nepotism, and blatantly corrupt abuses of power...launched YET ANOTHER BS McCarthyite witch hunt based on blatantly constitutionally-illiterate nonsense just because he runs an international business...and the court rejected not only the notion that they had standing, but that this was even controversial in the first place...but sure, they "made no decision on the merit."
From the article:
“The Constitution permits the Judiciary to speak only in the context of an Article III case or controversy and this lawsuit presents neither.”
Whatever you gotta tell yourself.
Bookmarks